Posts Tagged ‘Massachusetts’

Mass. Senate race heats as angry GOP nominee calls Ed Markey ‘pond scum’ – Washington Times

May 26, 2013
Saul Alinsky

Saul Alinsky, prepared the way for the Beast to “overthrow the kingdom by flatteries” (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/may/24/mass-senate-race-heats-angry-gop-nominee-calls-ed-/

 

Gabriel Gomez wins this round. The headline quotes Gomez but you have to read the article to see that the title “pond scum” actually fits the attacks by the Ed Markey campaign against him, like the ad described that used not-so-subliminal tricks to play with a viewers’ minds.

 

People should educated themselves to those kinds of tricks used in both commercial and political propaganda.

 

They have already been learning a lot about the Saul Alinsky tricks that “leftists” use to subvert discourse and push their agenda, mostly pulling no punches.

 

Markey is now associated with “pond scum” and rightly so. A few of Alinsky’s tricks can just backfire on the “pond scum” that use them, like in this case, because associating Representative Ed Markey from Massachusetts with “pond scum” is an appropriate one for defending the vile ad. Markey’s use of the word “desperation” seem to apply to Ed Markey himself, as ads like these show a flailing propagandist’s own desperation.

 

Ed Markey is drowning in ad hominem, in other words. But acting like you have the morality of “pond scum”, and then defending it, seems to confirm the label.

 

 

Romney and Obama: Is there ANY difference?

November 4, 2012

In the article linked below, Chuck Baldwin included an interesting (very long) list of positions that both Romney and Obama hold in common:

 

http://chuckbaldwinlive.com/home/archives/5229

 

But in another interesting twist, Chuck exposes the fact that a great many “conservative” organizations have received big money from “a slew of PACS and foundations that funneled thousands of dollars” that Romney created, and apparently they put on their own muzzles and made him out to be a “conservative”, as if he had repented of his strong pro-abortion policies and push for ever more and bigger government as governor in Massachusetts, increasing the control of government officials over our lives.

 

Here is just one paragraph with much of list but not all, with a comment below about one or two of them, kind of disclaimers…

 

As I have noted in previous columns, the differences between Mitt Romney and Barack Obama are miniscule on virtually every salient issue. They both supported TARP; they both supported Obama’s economic stimulus package; they both supported so-called assault weapons bans and other gun control measures; Obama has an “F” rating from Gun Owners of America, while Romney has a “D-” rating from GOA; neither man supports a balanced budget; neither man opposes foreign aid; they both supported the bailout of the auto industry; they both have a track record of being big spenders; they both fully support the Federal Reserve; they both oppose a full audit of the Fed; they are both supporters of universal health care; both men are showered with campaign contributions from Wall Street; neither of them wants to eliminate the IRS or the direct income tax; both men are on record as saying the TSA is doing a “great job”; they both supported the NDAA, including the indefinite detention of American citizens without due process of law; they both supported the renewal of the Patriot Act; they both believe that the President has “executive power” to assassinate and kill; both support the “free trade” agenda of the global elite; they are both soft on illegal immigration; they both support NAFTA and CAFTA; they both have a history of appointing liberal judges; they both believe the President has the authority to take the nation to war without the approval of Congress; and neither of them has any qualms about running up more public debt to the already gargantuan debt of 16 trillion dollars.

 

I’m going to parse out that list for effect in bullet form to make them more visible:

 

They both supported TARP;

 

they both supported Obama’s economic stimulus package;

 

they both supported so-called assault weapons bans and other gun control measures;

 

Obama has an “F” rating from Gun Owners of America, while Romney has a “D-” rating from GOA;

 

neither man supports a balanced budget;

 

neither man opposes foreign aid;

 

they both supported the bailout of the auto industry;

 

they both have a track record of being big spenders;

 

they both fully support the Federal Reserve;

 

they both oppose a full audit of the Fed;

 

they are both supporters of universal health care;

 

both men are showered with campaign contributions from Wall Street;

 

neither of them wants to eliminate the IRS or the direct income tax;

 

both men are on record as saying the TSA is doing a “great job”;

 

they both supported the NDAA, including the indefinite detention of American citizens without due process of law;

 

they both supported the renewal of the Patriot Act;

 

they both believe that the President has “executive power” to assassinate and kill;

 

both support the “free trade” agenda of the global elite;

 

they are both soft on illegal immigration;

 

they both support NAFTA and CAFTA;

 

they both have a history of appointing liberal judges;

 

they both believe the President has the authority to take the nation to war without the approval of Congress;

 

and neither of them has any qualms about running up more public debt to the already gargantuan debt of 16 trillion dollars.

 

[Editor’s note: I do support free trade, but not the “free trade agenda” of “the global elite”, because their “free trade agenda” has nothing to do with “free trade”, but it does relate to very un-free control.]

There are more things they hold in common, and Chuck Baldwin does mention some of them, like the fact that they both support the current legal enforcement of the both ridiculous and dangerous (for babies) scientific view that a baby in the womb is part of a woman’s own body. Obama has broken many promises and told many lies, but then Romney says he’s pro-life, giving talking heads a chance to say they’re glad he changed his position, but he says he’ll do nothing about Roe v Wade, and he doesn’t talk about this, and he does not speak repentant about his economy-damaging effects of his policies as governor in Massachusetts.

 

Gun Owners of America

Gun Owners of America (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

Just to say that a forced tax on every Massachusetts resident that on the national scale Americans marched against by the millions and even all the left-leaning polls said were against by 70 percent, meaning probably 85 percent, is a “good solution” for anybody is to be clueless and shows he is NEITHER “conservative” and certainly not libertarian.

 

“Let’s not also forget that Romney’s advisors actually met with Obama’s advisors on a dozen occasions to assist them with designing ObamaCare! It’s no surprise that Romney is refusing to call ObamaCare a tax, even though it’s the largest middle class tax hike in American history. The reason for this is because, while governor, his RomneyCare plan–the model for ObamaCare–was attacked as a tax and he argued it wasn’t.

 

“Let’s not also forget that Romney’s advisors actually met with Obama’s advisors on a dozen occasions to assist them with designing ObamaCare! It’s no surprise that Romney is refusing to call ObamaCare a tax, even though it’s the largest middle class tax hike in American history. The reason for this is because, while governor, his RomneyCare plan–the model for ObamaCare–was attacked as a tax and he argued it wasn’t.

 

Romney projects an air of knowing much more about his topics than Obama, but he is still a top-down guy that wants to impose his own solutions on everybody that doesn’t want them. And so Romney will know what he is saying when he reads a teleprompter.

 

I pretty much agree with Mr. Baldwin that Romney will win this election, but unfortunately his administration will look like the Bush years, and meantime the powers that be in the USA continue to push us fast toward a dollar crash.

 

 

 

 

Judge Napolitano Warns That Drug Contamination Will Happen Again If the Government Continues to Regulate | Fox News Insider

October 28, 2012
Andrew Napolitano & Tom Woods

Andrew Napolitano & Tom Woods (Photo credit: Gage Skidmore)

 

http://foxnewsinsider.com/2012/10/09/meningitis-steroid-shot-contamination-outbreak-judge-napolitano-government-regulation/

 

He surmised, “The government is incapable of doing what it has charged itself with the responsibility of doing because it has no competition and there are no consequences when it fails.” As a result, Judge Napolitano forewarned, this will happen again.

What’s the alternative? Judge Napolitano said that since states can’t be sued if people are harmed, insurance companies should be in charge of regulating because they would be held accountable.

 

Massachusetts is probably the most regulated in your face state in the country. Their inspectors are empowered by the state to stay all day at any facility they choose, and they have a lot of them.

 

Look at how many hundreds of government departments there are in Massachusetts to take care of you and make sure you aren’t hurt by your own gullible stupidity:

 

http://www.mass.gov/portal/global-agency-list.html

 

And yet this slipped out. The company will be shut down but the state inspectors? Nothing will happen to them. Will all the gullible statists that think they can have an omniscient and caring government take care of them, will they throw out the governor for this?

 

Maybe not. It’s only a scandal where people are dying, happens to be Tennessee mostly, but even there, it’s not that big a percentage of the population. It’s one BIG DEAL to the families that have been hurt, for sure.

 

One thing for sure, those inspectors are not going to hurt. As a matter of fact, this episode has the naive and gullible now calling for more inspectors. There will be no demotions unless the public forces the state government to pay or the state forces the inspectors involved to pay.

 

But they have the old standby that works for state-control advocates pretty well usually -so far-: We just need more money to hire more people and to buy more tools.

 

It’s quite the scam.

 

 

The oppressive heel of stifling government regulation

October 28, 2012

The recent meningitis outbreak, with dozens of deaths and hundreds of serious illnesses has been traced to a facility that was filthy, and was exempt from government regulations and inspections concerning the production of drugs.

First, remember that all the massive regulation ALREADY in place did NOTHING to stop the sale of these supposedly contaminated batches of medications. This is the cost of losing caveat emptor.

If the government regulated used car sales like they do medications, nobody would be able to afford one anymore!

When you have a populace that is educated according to the individual convictions of each one’s parents, and has not had its minds zombified by having a nanny state government that guarantees an omniscient ability to protect it from all corporate evils, then you have a populace that regulates the hell out of the markets.

We have MORE of that today with government regulation. The FDA is a big drug-pusher, if for the ones who have the right cozy relationship with the proper agent-in-charge.

The FDA and the Agriculture Department have done more to destroy the health of the nation’s people than help them.

Stores that sell healthy nutrition and healthy food have been relegated to a dark niche market restricted to the rich and those who appreciate the difference, because those who sell it have been censored by rules that “regulate” medical claims.

Marijuana could help some people in some cases in pain and in other ways but THE REGULATORS “protect us” by telling us it is as bad as heroin.

If health food bakeries tell the truth, they are slapped down with punitive fines. There have been businesses bragging about benefits. If you aren’t a BIG corporation that can pay for a $5 million study, you can’t tell what you know is the truth about a product.

Drugs are advertised all day on your favorite TV programs. Listen to the big long disclaimer list in those ads, and then think about the fact that those omniscient superhuman beings that said they could market and advertise (think your dictators) are the same omniscient superhuman beings that say marijuana is just as dangerous as heroin and cannot be prescribed or taken for any use whatsoever.

Oh and don’t forget HEMP that has no recreational effect at all!

Oh what divine wisdom we entrust to both our elected officials and to the bureaucracy that hires the divine wisdom of characters that prefer to be little regulation dictators.

Oh yeah, we’re so dumb we need to be told what we can eat, buy, sell, drink, drive, or THINK.

If you think that scandal was bad, you should have seen the stories about the VETERANS ADMINISTRATION hospital in South Florida a few years ago, where things were truly and really filthy.

As you know, that’s a government facility.