Second Amendment: Did they mean to protect the right of only governments to arm themselves? Really?

Mr. P. H. would have his readers believe that the Second Amendment was meant to ONLY protect the right of the *government* to “bear arms” for the protection of a “free state”!

Yessir, they say, the Founding Fathers knew that without a constitution that guaranteed the right of the government to bear arms, why, the poor Congress and the poor Executive and the poor government-financed Army and the militia that they organized would be left defenseless! Nobody would let them arm the police! How could they have a standing army!

You heard right. They do agree that these rights are for all individuals, and that the fourteenth amendment recognized that these rights extend to individual rights from all governments (federal, state, local):

–free exercise of religion
–freedom from a religious establishment (official church)
–speech
–press
–assembly
–petition the Government for redress
–freedom from forced hosting of soldiers, whether in time of peace or war both
–to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable and warrantless searches and seizures
–no holding to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury
–freedom from double jeopardy
–to refuse to be forced to testify against one’s self
–to one’s life, liberty AND property, except by *due process* of law (not arbitrary process)
–freedom eminent domain except for a public purpose
–fair compensation for properties seized under eminent domain
–if accused, a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of peers, to confront witnesses against him, assistance of counsel, and to obtain witnesses in his own favor
–and, no excessive bail
–ALL other rights even if not enumerated

But some people say that there is one that was included in this list of INDIVIDUAL rights that was the ONE exception. That is, they say, that the right to defend your freedom against your own government is a right that they reserved for only the government itself!?!

Advertisement

Columbians want to finish what Uribe started

The FARC may be protected –I do believe that. After all, for example, Jimmy Carter pushed “Rhodesia” into elections that Muzorewa won, and when the Mugabe gang cried foul (they didn’t win) then Carter pushed Zimbabwe into elections that Mugabe won. And he has not let go since.

The fracking story, same as here in the States, is just another meme that the elites are pushing to keep the gullible agitated about something, fearful about something so that their astroturf grassroots (with the gullible) can then demand more control. Elites to the rescue! After all, they are (this is their term, not mine) our “interplanetary guardians”! (Kid you not! You can’t make this stuff up! Stranger than fiction!)

About *-Columbia-* now, I lived there in Medellin as a missionary when there was a strong cartel presence and strong guerrilla presence both, and I’ve known lots of Columbians here in Miami. One I worked with agreed, that Uribe is a national hero among the people. In the States even alternative media doesn’t get the facts as well as they do with what’s going on here and to some extent in Europe.

Columbians in general were sick, tired, and disgusted with the lame way things were going. Gaviria got elected precisely on a platform of negotiating with FARC, and he was so serious about it he met their demand for a safe zone territory inside Columbia where they would not be bothered. (Probably to the consternation of its inhabitants). But Columbians wanted peace that’s why they elected him.

That was then. This is now. The FARC only used their safe zone to hold their couple hundred kidnapped ransom hostages, and stall, stall, stall, and they kept on killing people and blowing up things, business as usual. This went on for almost Gaviria’s entire one constitutional term. Near the end, due to pressure and embarrassment, he finally declare talks over and gave an ultimatum for that zone.

Biggest embarrassment for Gaviria was when the “paramilitary” groups –which had nothing to do with the military, that word is usually a propaganda trick of the elites, in my opinion. They circled that zone at one point and the FARC broke off talks demanding the government stop them. (OH, the irony! Government could not defeat FARC but stop the other guys). The independent self-defense forces were much more effective against them. (I met one guy who had land who gave us a ride once while hitchhiking). They just wanted to defend themselves.

So when Uribe ran for president, he spoke very clearly about getting serious about shutting them down. I think Columbians knew by then that the civilian politicians were timid about it, and saw Uribe as more serious. And serious he must have been, because during the campaign they murdered his son. Uribe’s next campaign speech after that was furious, and he said they thought they would stop him, but he was more determined than ever.

He proved to do exactly that, and the Columbians awarded him with a change in their constitution (not very easy there) to let him run a second term. They began getting some victories. That’s when Uribe got intelligence that led their forces to a FARC camp inside Ecuador that the Chavista president was obviously protecting. Correa was more angry about Columbian forces violating their territory than he was over Columbian guerrillas violating their territory (oops, maybe he had invited them?) or over Ecuador violating Columbian territory by supporting guerrilla bases.

So the Columbians changed their constitution again! And Uribe got a *third* term!

And my Columbian friends could not say enough good about him! In spite of the worldwide leftist propaganda machine. They indicted some Congresswoman to make it look like Uribe used dirty tricks to get re-elected but Columbians are not stupid. Not all that much.

So yeah. Leftists like Chavez, Correa in Ecuador, Morales in Bolivia, sure corporations can deal with them. They prefer a government that can guarantee them protection and deals. But like Paraguay shows, there are chinks and leaks in the Propaganda Machine. According to Bible passages in Daniel, Revelation and others, the description of the prophesied world government fits socialist regimes. (“Shall by peace overthrow many”, “shall gain the kingdom by flatteries”, “a collector of taxes shall rise up”..) But they also speak of plenty of trouble for his regime, including from many who are not Bible believers.

So for all this, no, I would not be surprised at pseudo-capitalists, fascist-capitalists, working with leftists. At least the elites, the ones that coordinate. No doubt they do. Armand Hammer, Warburg. Saw a Cold-War era movie made in Russia once, about the Swedish capitalists that worked with the Bolsheviks to make great numbers of train cars to save the masses from hunger (according to this movie haha).

Also about the USG helping leftist regimes, I’ve shared many times (my contra-propaganda mission) that the American ambassador Hugo Llorens to (my wife’s country) Honduras (Hugo Llorens) was used in Zelaya’s TV spots as if he endorsed Zelaya’s fraudulent “referendum/survey”. He was at Zelaya’s presidential palace the night before the “survey” would take place that would justify his Chavez-style dictatorship, at the same table as the inner circle of planners. He was “known” in Honduran social circles to be in a compromising relationship with Zelaya’s son.

Hondurans were massively relieved when Zelaya was relieved of his then illegitimate occupation of the presidential palace.

USG intervention was definitely and unequivocally tilted “leftist” in that case. Who knows? Maybe they knowingly cooperated with the phony “coup” in Venezuela. The Chavista Supreme Court cleared the top military brass of all charges and they got full retirement with benefits, very quietly, a year or so later.

Columbia is a beautiful country and are horrified –like it says there– at the prospect of one of these brutal killers getting office. Columbia still has an ongoing amnesty program, and any one of them can just give up at any time. Uribe had them almost wiped out. Columbians are mad that Santos eased off the goal of ending it.

In Guatemala, Efrain Rios Montt put a halt to ranchers-motivated killings of protesting Indians and started a “guns and beans” program. The Indians themselves were armed and trained to defend themselves against the guerrillas and they made sure they didn’t go hungry doing it, and helped them trade too. The result was that the guerrillas lost the war right then in Guatemala, and the “Left” has never forgiven him. Guatemala would have elected him.

Overpopulation?

About “Misconception” the movie:
Overpopulation is a Myth: Q&A with Misconception Filmmaker Jessica Yu
http://libertycrier.com/overpopulation-myth-qa-misconception-filmmaker-jessica-yu/

“Are we asking the right questions, or are we still in this old mindset where we think it’s all about overpopulation? Because it’s not,” says Jessica Yu, the Academy Award-winning filmmaker behind the new documentary Misconception.

Reason TV’s Zach Weissmueller sat down with Yu at the Tribeca Film Festival in New York to discuss her film and the subject it covers: global overpopulation. Yu says that after making the documentary Last Call at the Oasis about the so-called “water crisis,” she faced a barrage of questions about overpopulation.

“At every screening in the Q&A, someone in the audience would stand up and say, ‘Why are we even talking about conservation when we can’t control population growth?’” says Yu.

Is the mark of the Beast an embedded chip?

http://www.libertytothecaptives.net/hinton_rev_13_16.html
“Ridiculous Bible Corrections by Modern Apostates”
#75 [Rev 13:16] On the hand?

The following article was written by Dr. John Hinton, Bible Restoration Ministry. Rev 13:16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

Ever since the RV and the ASV, users of modern versions have been given the misleading translation of this verse in such a manner:

“And he causeth all, the small and the great,
and the rich and the poor, and the free and the bond,
that there be given them a mark on their right hand,
or upon their forehead;” Rev. 13:16 ASV

“Also it causes all, both small and great, both
rich and poor, both free and slave, to be marked on
the right hand or the forehead,” Rev. 13:16 RSV

There is only one problem with most of these versions’ treatments of this verse, and that that the mark of the beast is stated to be on the hand and not in it as the KJV tells us. These two prepositions are small words, but the error is not a small one at all. Some translations go so far as to mislead readers by insinuating that the mark is a tattoo. This is not impossible, since a tattoo is both on the skin and in the skin, but it is not stated in any Greek text and at best it is a guess. At worse, it is a lie to misguide those who fall for the new version scam
…continues…

…
Even more will ignore the further warning that some may go along with the Antichrist system without an actual mark, but by taking the number or name of the beast, however, that will be a future essay topic. The users of texts like the NIV will be among the first to become part of the system. The NIV, which is the largest selling “Bible” on the market, has not only changed the mark to one that is on the hand or
forehead, but it has removed the Antichrist entirely by calling the number 666 man’s number, removed the name Lucifer entirely, removed the warning about the Beast’s name or number, and has called the future reformation during Christ’s reign on earth the New Order! The Antichrist will give them the Rock and Roll and other forms of entertainment that they crave, and their perversion of scripture will not warn them.

I could continue for hundreds of pages and not exhaust the subject of enslavement technology, but I will force myself to stop here. Everywhere we look we see evidence that the mark of the beast will be an inserted mark as the KJV warns us. The KJV and other early translators would never have foreseen that such technology would come into being, but they were still inspired to put together a translation that was prophetic. It should be added that if the mark were a tattoo, the KJV would still be correct. A tattoo is both on and in the skin. The modern version committees are the product of New Agers, Luciferians, witches, Darwinists, Marxists, abortion supporters, and an
assortment of other degenerates, apostates, and seekers of filthy lucre. It should not require much discernment to know which text to follow.

Also about the Mark but I think less “on the mark”:

This article by Terry Watkins is good and detailed, and I have a couple of reactions to it.
http://www.av1611.org/666/whatis.html

1. He seems to try a little too much to say the mark of the Beast is NOT a microchip, a subcutaneous chip. In fact he comes out and says that. I agree that the mark of the Beast comes in one package together with some kind of loyalty oath, explicit or implicit, to the Beast.

2. But as part of this case, he says it “has the power” to prevent buying and selling. But it does not say that, it just says no one may buy or sell without it. I cannot get my email without a password but the password doesn’t have any power at all.

3. I also agree that it is not very fruitful to speculate on exactly how the mark of the Beast relates to the number 666. But! I do think that it is fruitful to notice things that are not coincidental, like the apparent embedding of a 6 and 6 and 6 in the UPC codes. That is verifiable fact. It is no more hidden than the Masonic eye and pyramid and the owl on the dollar bill.

To me, it is also significant that the most named secret society today, associated with Weishaupt, that created its own web site to debunk what the page said was “garbage” about it on the Internet, in one invitation, as a freebie tip, divulged that one certain embedded chip company was one of their companies, and suggested investing.

4. He “doesn’t plan on hanging around” for the tribulation, but we all will, like it or not, as the Word says. That’s a big topic for another day, though…

5. Strangely, he says the word for “mark” is more evidence of a “mark” or “stamp” rather than a micro-chp implant. But he must not realize that his actual argument for this based on the Greek word actually makes the case stronger for an embedded chip.

6. Among other things, he uses the size of the chip most discussed being the size of a grain of rice being too big to embed under the skin of the forehead. Actually it’s not, because the skin stretches. Their propaganda machine is strong. They can make the visibility into a badge of honor.

7. He ridicules that idea that the Babylon of Revelations refers to “New York”, but it is not so ridiculous. Maybe he thinks the US is still a godly country, or maybe he thinks it’s Rome. Lots of Bible commentators through the centuries thought it was Rome, or the Vatican.

But if you go through Revelation 17 and 18 verse by verse, New York, or even the US, or maybe the West Coast, meets the fit for more of the listed criteria.

5a. Rev 17:16-17 notes that the ten kings that take power with the Beast conspire to “burn her with fire”, because God put it in their hearts to fulfill his will.. The implication there is that they see this “Mystery Babylon” as a power impeding plans for their global empire.

5b. As to the seven heads of the beast she sat on, the angel (“prophet like you” he said later) says to John: “I will tell thee the mystery of the woman, and of the beast that carrieth her, which hath the seven heads and ten horns.”, and then proceeds to tell him the seven heads are seven mountains and that there are seven kings. Of the seven five are fallen, one is, one is to be “a short space”. That is, five kings are fallen (what else? Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Medo-Persia, Greece), one is (Rome) and one is to be a “short space” (the Beast reign).

In a side note, the author mentions a patent number 58784155, for facilitating sales with a tattoo processed by electronic media. This testifies more to how ridiculous it is to have patents, since the most sophisticated nation in the world would issue a patent to an idea that was so obvious on its face. In fact, Christians had already been predicting this for the mark of the Beast since the 1980s. One of the modern “translations” has the word “tattoo”. How else would they track it.

By the way, some towns in Latin America are more strongly Christian than the US today. One small town in Honduras was assigned a new area code once, and there was so much blowback from residents that Hondutel had to back off and promise they would nix the number (666).

12 answers to questions about faith, politics, church and state and taxes

I just read through a discussion forum where the question was asked about whether a Christian should talk openly about his faith when discussing politics with an unbeliever. Amazingly, only one of the Christians in this group quoted the Bible on the subject. He was very mildly criticized for the context of them because of the presence of one non-believer who was sharp in his reprimands, but shared the same self-righteous attitude about it all, the “politically fashionable” one. (I don’t call fashion “correct” as the term is an oxymoron as used today).

I pulled a few choice snippets with my reactions. My reactions are indented.

“As is tragically known today, the war gave Hitler undreamed of possibilities to “purify” Europe. Though the scale of Christian persecution cannot be compared to the Jewish Holocaust of 1941-1945, except perhaps in Poland, the ultimate destruction of Christianity was one of the Nazis long-term aims.”

A==> That hate and persecution of the Nazi regime against Christianity was something that was not taught to us when I went to school in the government indoctrination centers. It is knowledge “in the wild” now and in the street because of the Internet. We must pray that the Internet will remain as free as it is today. If they start imposing taxes or start any regulation on it, they will try to come in through some lying trickery, like one bill that claims to protect “journalists” from divulging sources but hides a new regime to require licensing for reporters. A license to report.

Imagine laws requiring licenses like the ones they use to regulate the right of the citizen to have the means to defend himself and his family against the tyranny of the worst danger they have, the one the Bill of Rights had in mind for the Second Amendment, that being their own government.

“Any Christians you know that may be interested in reversing this muzzle decree on us here in the USA?”

The “Muzzle decree” probably refers to the long-standing rules for 501(c)3 status tax-deductible religious organizations.

Check out this book by Peter Kershaw in pdf form, I have read it and it will blow away the ignorance we have about churches having any legal obligation to bow down to Caesar’s taxation. This is the book that opened my eyes on this subject:
www.jcmatthews.org/uploads/5/3/7/7/5377341/in_caesars_grip.pdf

There are churches popping up all over it seems like that have not applied to anybody for anything, and know that the USG code explicitly says that churches are “automatically exempt” but that they “may find it convenient to apply” for exemption. Hey, you get a free muzzle with it, whether you like it or not!

If our rulers and their Propaganda Machine cared as much about separation of church and state, instead of wanting so bad to subjugate the church under the thumb of the state, they would proclaim them free, like Thomas Jefferson did. Jefferson put language into the Virginia State Constitution that forbad the state from issuing any charter or licensure or registration for any religious organization. That’s why Jerry Fallwell had to file suit against the state of Virginia in federal court for the “right” to be able to incorporate his church in the state of Virginia, whereupon no doubt his accountants and lawyers immediately asked the IRS for recognition, with that free muzzle they offered.

See also “Free Church Ministry”: http://freechurchministry.com

In one company where I worked, they had three tax categories in the software: (1) taxable (bring your state document), (2) exempt and (3) non-taxable.

“LBJ and the Power Hour”: http://www.thepowerhour.com/news2/lbj_churches.htm
(Looks like this Power Hour has nothing to do with Crystal Cathedrals)

“The Truth About Church Incorporation”:
http://www.ecclesia.org/truth/501-church.html

“We Are a Free Church”:
http://thefreedomfellowshipchurch.com/about-us-2/we-are-a-free-church

1st Amendment to the Constitution of The United States of America (The Bill of Rights)

“Congress shall make NO law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof …”

Our Founding Fathers were well aware of the atrocities in Europe (and other places) where the Christian Church was regulated or controlled by the State. They determined not to have that in America.

BUT if you do this, go into it with your eyes open. It’s not as easy to open bank accounts, for example, without some state-recognized identity (in the States I’m talking about here, elsewhere it’s criminal to avoid the state but Christians avoid bondage anyway). And most bank officers probably wouldn’t know what you’re talking about if you were to ask them anything about this.

“I believe when we ‘walk the talk’ and it is done in the correct way, we don’t have to tell anyone we are Christians. Others will know it.”

Well, they are not going to be saved if they do not call on the name of the Lord. Right after Romans 10:9-10, where Paul said it is precisely believing in the resurrection of Jesus Christ that justifies one but “with the mouth confession is made unto salvation”, we are REQUIRED as believers to bring them to a decision.

Romans 10:13 For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved. 14 How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him of whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher?

15 And how shall they preach, except they be sent? as it is written, How beautiful are the feet of them that preach the gospel of peace, and bring glad tidings of good things!

Matthew 24 was not talking about Christians censoring the name of Christ out of their conversation: Matthew 24:14 And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the end come.

Anyway, if you love Jesus you will ‘love to tell the story”, as it goes, and you’ll testify like Peter and John:
“They ceased not to teach and preach Jesus Christ”.

Daniel 12:3 And they that be wise shall shine as the brightness of the firmament; and they that turn many to righteousness as the stars for ever and ever.

Are you going to be ashamed or will you have stars in your crown?

“In politics, when you are speaking with a non-believer about politics, they will RUN when you start trying to convert them.
My opinion is, we ‘walk the walk’ until they want to ‘talk the talk’.
AND
If they see you exhibiting your faith through your actions, they will start asking questions other than political questions,”

Well, you don’t come up to them and conk them on the head with the “four steps to salvation”, first you talk to them, find out where you can introduce the gospel to them explicitly. Jesus simply asked for the Samaritan woman for some water. (First witness). Then he showed prophetic insight to specifics about here life (second witness). She immediately recognized this Jew was different (they could talk without contempt, they could share water, he saw she opened up about her life).

Two witnesses once came up to a long-haired student radical (me) on the Berkeley campus and showed me that story, but after leading up to it in conversation. A couple of months later I joined that “Jesus People movement” to become a missionary.

But in politics, it can be a missionary field like with WiIliam Wilberforce. To this day, he is a witness for his fight to abolish slavery in the explicitly in the name of Jesus Christ always hovering. John Newton “anointed” him for this, in a sense.

But politics, more so today than then, is a horrendous beast to battle, and very rare is there a character like Ron Paul that can withstand the temptations.

Ron Paul did not hide the fact of his commitment to Christ, and he explicitly said that “everything” –that’s right, everything, he did was in fulfillment of service to Christ.

Freedom from forced extortion (taxes), stealth robbery (inflation), freedom from forced iniquity or even forced righteousness (regulations, drug wars, sin taxes, and all that).

Jesus Christ unleashed physical fury on the money changers in the temple. The Federal Reserve operatives no doubt had to spend extra time in the gym venting their frustration when he exposed their robbery and their plotting against our economy.

(Then there was the one Christian who quoted verses, but he used four the corrupted modern versions, so I shared this:)

==> J, you would do good to use the one standard against which all others should be held to measure, the one that *still* stands the test of time, the King James Bible. The translators of today are the products of places like Harvard Divinity School, nest of atheists, witches, lesbians, homosexuals, and everything else but Bible-believing Christians (as John Hinton described).

http://www.libertytothecaptives.net/hinton_rev_13_16.html

K: “Let faith reside alongside reason, but don’t let faith overtake reason (or vice versa).”

Well, wait a minute there. In my case, I came to faith based precisely on reason. Faith rests on fact. When Peter’s faith faltered when he was walking on the water, he reached out to the fact of Jesus Christ to stop falling and come back up to stand on the surface again.

When Thomas doubted, he saw the fact of the wounds on Jesus’ resurrected body and from then on his faith was based on fact.

Kerem: “From another perspective, Joseph, do you think that other religions have no redeeming qualities?”

You probably mean “good qualities”. It’s rather obvious that almost all “other religions’ have some “good qualities”, or at least some good doctrine or another, or some good practices. But they miss out on the one most vital and basic “redeeming quality”.

If all you have to show for your goodness are good works, and still reject the only one who is perfect, or who ever was, your sin is like the GOOD man Job, who had nothing BUT “redeeming qualities” in the sense of his works, but he finally repented and saw his evil sin of self-righteousness. Just the mere thought that God would have to accept you based on all those good works, thinking you don’t have enough bad ones to mess it up, you’re like the Rich Young Ruler that went away sorrowful, because although he kept all the four commandments Jesus listed, he did not want to obey the two greatest commandments. Loving God above all, and loving his neighbor as himself, no, he preferred his temporal riches.

There were other rich and even powerful men who did have their hearts right, and in faith they were able to receive God’s mercy and forgiveness: Nicodemus, Levi (Matthew) the tax collector, Joseph of Arithmea, a centurion or two, even the “women who ministered to him of their substance”.

K: I am asking this in the spirit of an intellectual discourse, so please refrain from quoting the Bible as an answer or accusing me of being a humanist, which is a term you can drive an 18-wheel truck through (like labelling something right or left idea).

How can one show you that the answers to all these questions are in the Bible if you tell them not to quote it? As to you being a humanist, maybe somebody did accuse you based on previous commentary or not, no matter to me, but you’ll see that I like to answer straight. If I’m talking to a Samaritan I don’t call her “goy” (a vulgar insult used by Jews among themselves sometimes for Gentiles), if I’m talking to a homosexual I might even call him “gay” and never sodomite, and so on. Jew to the Jew, Greek to the Greek.

Bev: The meaning for mutual respect for me is when each person treats the other with the utmost kindness. Treat the other as you want to be treated.

The Golden Rule, nothing better for a Christian in personal interaction with the people he comes across in life.

For everyone else, we can expect, and work toward, teaching them that the only way we can all interact politically and economically in peace, is by application of the “non-aggression principle”.

See it explained here:
http://wiki.mises.org/wiki/Principle_of_non-aggression

J: I have witnessed firsthand ruin, devastation, and, including death, for some caught up in cults.

That word “cult” is a very much abused word, used by some of the most malicious abusers in recent American history, against New Religious Movements, as they are more rightly called.

There have been a great many crimes in the 20th century and even the 19th against people that were accused of being in a “cult”, while the worst of closeted witches and Satanists were cackling like mad chickens, like one said who escaped to Christ.

Like the most famous “deprogrammer”, who sought out rich parents for pay to “rescue” their adult children who had joined “cults”. He would kidnap them, take them to secluded rooms where he shined lights in their eyes, deprived them of sleep, sometimes even drug them to try to get them to recant. He told his adepts that the first thing to do was to take away their “specially marked Bibles”. Just like an Inquisition or a movie torture scene. I have known victims of this abuse myself.

Of course you’ll get some successfully modified victims who suffer that malady when the kidnap victim starts to identify with the abuser. And so you get them claiming abuse where there was none.

Some of the complainants about “cults” are ex-members who’ve been successfully “re-programmed” to conform and obey “the Man” again. Others were merely offended at requirements to obey the rules they agreed to on joining. Others were caught in offenses, like two guys in one Jesus People community that were caught in the middle of a homosexual act, and excommunicated for the act, and they ran straight to the Christian press (Christianity Today I think) and accused that group of their own sin.

Anita: As American is a beacon of light to the world, so is Christianity.

America was once a reflector of light to the world, because there was such a strong Christian tradition and culture of Christianity in the world.

The Revolution, with the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, happened in the aftermath of what’s called the “Great Awakening” of the 18th century, a strong movement in which great numbers came to Christ.

Note that it was Christians like Patrick Henry and Gouverneur Morris, and their allies, that forced the “Founding Fathers” to include the Bill of Rights as a condition for ratifying the Constitution. But the Founders were not such a uniform bunch of saints like Don Barton likes to make them out to be. Alexander Hamilton was some of kind devil, in fact, because he was obsessed with his creation of a Central Bank, something Thomas Jefferson wisely opposed, and thank God, Andrew Jackson threw straight to the sewer where it belonged when he got the chance.

So there you go. One more thing before I go.

john 3:16 For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life.
17 For God sent not his Son into the world to condemn the world; but that the world through him might be saved.
18 He that believeth on him is not condemned: but he that believeth not is condemned already, because he hath not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God.
19 And this is the condemnation, that light is come into the world, and men loved darkness rather than light, because their deeds were evil.
20 For every one that doeth evil hateth the light, neither cometh to the light, lest his deeds should be reproved.
21 But he that doeth truth cometh to the light, that his deeds may be made manifest, that they are wrought in God.

Isaiah 1: 16 Wash you, make you clean; put away the evil of your doings from before mine eyes; cease to do evil;
17 Learn to do well; seek judgment, relieve the oppressed, judge the fatherless, plead for the widow.
18 Come now, and let us reason together, saith the Lord: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool.

To T. D. Jakes: There’s a better answer to Larry King than the one atheist Carl Sagan used

T.D. Jakes Tells Larry King ‘God is the One thing that Cannot Be Proven’ and Likens it to Proving ‘Love’ or ‘Pain’ (VIDEO):
http://www.breathecast.com/articles/t-d-jakes-tells-larry-king-god-is-the-one-thing-that-cannot-be-proven-and-likens-it-to-proving-love-or-pain-15907/ or
http://tinyurl.com/l5f7vlu

Hey Jakes, Hey King! There’s more proof for the God of the Holy Bible than there is for the Big Bang! (

The Big Bang requires 98% of the universe to be composed of matter and energy that there is ZERO evidence for)

Somebody tell Jakes there’s a better answer, and look at a few scriptures on the subject:

Acts 1:3 To whom also he shewed himself alive after his passion by many infallible proofs, being seen of them forty days, and speaking of the things pertaining to the kingdom of God:

Luke the physician, talking evidence.

2 Peter 2:16 For we have not followed cunningly devised fables, when we made known unto you the power and coming of our Lord Jesus Christ, but were eyewitnesses of his majesty.

Acts 2:32 This Jesus hath God raised up, whereof we all are witnesses.

Exodus 10:2 And that thou mayest tell in the ears of thy son, and of thy son’s son, what things I have wrought in Egypt, and my signs which I have done among them; that ye may know how that I am the Lord.

Matthew 9:6 But that ye may know that the Son of man hath power on earth to forgive sins, (then saith he to the sick of the palsy,) Arise, take up thy bed, and go unto thine house.

(Similarly in Mark 2:10 and Luke 5:24)

And I fell at his feet to worship him. And he said unto me, See thou do it not: I am thy fellowservant, and of thy brethren that have the testimony of Jesus: worship God: for the testimony of Jesus is the spirit of prophecy. — Revelations 19:10

There are so many more like this.
Prove me now herewith and see — Malachi

Christianity is the only major religion in the world that is really and truly based on a historical fact, not the teachings by a person. Certainly there are teachings but Jesus is risen and that’s a fact that is backed up by documentation (the four affidavits signed in martyrdom we know as the Gospels), and secular histories, and even the Talmud, the one that calls Mary a prostitute and Jesus a bastard who did his miracles by sorcery, just like it says in the Gospels. God “maketh the wrath of man to praise him.”

And then there is the overwhelming evidence in thousands of details of the Creation. DNA, fossils reflecting special creation not gradual change (according to evolutionists), geology’s many “anomalies” that point to a great flood, the statistically improbable conformity of the pre-Christian flood stories worldwide, the anthropic principle, and much much more.

Larry King probably likes the kind of answer he got from T. D. Jakes. It’s probably why he brings on people like Jakes, but won’t interview a scientist that believes in Genesis One as written. Or somebody like Lee Stroebel, who had to know the evidence first. Or Discovery Center, if only to explain why they are not “Creationists” as in Young-Earth.

Lewinsky, powerful serial rapists, ignorance about home schooling, and Germany’s Nazi-era law against family and religious rights

Monica Lewinsky has come out of hiding, the only Clinton victim Controlled Media wanted to talk about

…

The Congress had the evidence of much greater crimes than cheating on his wife, and not even just the sexual harassment while governor of Paula Jones. There are the rapes denounced by Juanita Broaddrick, Elizabeth Ward (one former Miss Arkansas), rapes and assaults reported from Kathleen Wiley, Eileen Wellstone, Carolyn Moffet, others from Yale, and so on.

Hillary is a front-runner for the Democratic Party presidential nomination in 2016, just like she was in 2008, but the testimony from at least one of her husband’s victims is that she made threats to keep her quiet. This is bound to come out during the political season, and the usual gullible crowd will try to bring out the “conspiracy theory” as epithet again.

So what about the rape victims?

Great feminist she is, Hillary Clinton, said all of those dozen or so women who publicly accused her husband of rape and assault were all part of a conspiracy. The great feminists that they are that care so much about women’s rights, the National Organization for Women, kept a great deafening silence about this apparent serial rapist in such high office.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1157708/posts

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

NiSource, an Indiana company, refused to hire a home-school graduate.

Homeschool.com notes that in public schools, the average scores for reading, language and math is at 50 percent.

But

homeschoolers score in the 89 percentile in reading, 84th in language, 84th in math and 86th in science.

As

college freshman, they carry a grade point average of 3.41, compared to the 3.12 for other students. As seniors, they outscore others 3.46 to 3.16.

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/05/company-bans-homeschooled-workers/#rhjGA82QvrWKyj0j.99

And here’s a 15-year old college grad who was home-schooled:

http://www.csmonitor.com/The-Culture/Family/2014/0506/Homeschool-teen-graduates-college-at-15

Religious rights and family rights and children’s rights under fire:

http://www.wnd.com/2013/11/supreme-court-demands-obama-response/

Germany admits the ban on home schooling is to make everybody be good subjects of the state. And Obama agrees there’s no problem?

The German Supreme Court said it was banning “religiously

or philosophically motivated” homeschooling”. Only government approved religion and philosophy is acceptable in a tyrannical state.

The best place to regulate food safety is the free market

Pulled from a discussion over weeks on the Daily Bell web site:

Trutherator:

The best place to regulate food safety is the free market.

He:

Well, the free market did control food safety a hundred or so years ago, which is why so many people died from foodborne illness outbreaks… Most of those illnesses were from raw milk, as a matter of fact.

Trutherator:

One thing, Where did you get your numbers for this dubious claim? In other words, how do you know? Did they teach you that in the government-owned, government-operated, government indoctrination centers (euphemistically called “schools”)? In the same history classes that taught you that Abraham Lincoln once proposed making slavery a permanent institution by amendment to the Constitution, because it would help “preserve the Union” by keeping the slave states from seceding?

But what you have now with “food safety control” are heavy-handed government agencies ruled by the same operators that run the government-connected rent-seeking corporation executives. Get the contradiction, and get it good: the control freaks demand control of food safety, to protect other people, whether they like it or not. So they get a control freak agency run by the Big Food Industry executives. They get wolves from the local wolf-pack to protect us from the local wolf-pack!

Great idea! Policemen in the pay of Al Capone will protect you from Capone’s triggermen!

Stalin will protect you from abuses by secret police!

Hugo Chavez will protect the poor from abuses by the rich, even if he has to put in his own rich friends to do it!

Obama will protect us from Wall Street by appointing Wall Street bankers to control banking safety!

So now, the food industry titans decide on minimum regulations, keeping Mom and Pops out of the loop, and the breaches are bigger. Recalls of millions of pounds of canned meat, a big corporation goes bankrupt because it is ordered to recall everything, poisons travel inside foods across the country and requires millions of dollars to track down and call back because people can’t buy it from the farmer up the road or at the farmer’s market.

The millenium will be so much better and free.

Government will provide “safety”??

Pulled from a discussion over weeks on the Daily Bell web site:

Trutherator:

The best place to regulate food safety is the free market.

He:

Well, the free market did control food safety a hundred or so years ago, which is why so many people died from foodborne illness outbreaks… Most of those illnesses were from raw milk, as a matter of fact.

Trutherator:

One thing, Where did you get your numbers for this dubious claim? In other words, how do you know? Did they teach you that in the government-owned, government-operated, government indoctrination centers (euphemistically called “schools”)? In the same history classes that taught you that Abraham Lincoln once proposed making slavery a permanent institution by amendment to the Constitution, because it would help “preserve the Union” by keeping the slave states from seceding?

But what you have now with “food safety control” are heavy-handed government agencies ruled by the same operators that run the government-connected rent-seeking corporation executives. Get the contradiction, and get it good: the control freaks demand control of food safety, to protect other people, whether they like it or not. So they get a control freak agency run by the Big Food Industry executives. They get wolves from the local wolf-pack to protect us from the local wolf-pack!

Great idea! Policemen in the pay of Al Capone will protect you from Capone’s trigger men!

Stalin will protect you from abuses by secret police!

Hugo Chavez will protect the poor from abuses by the rich, even if he has to put in his own rich friends to do it!

Obama will protect us from Wall Street by appointing Wall Street bankers to control banking safety!

…

State of the military

When a nation turns its back on God, as this one did in the 1950s and 1960s, and rejects the love of the truth, God gives up when its cup of iniquity is full. And now they’re doing their best to push Christianity out of the Armed Forces.

So now, the commanders-in-chief, with loyalties outside their own subjects but to the forces in the shadows building toward their NWO and the alliances.

The military has been used far too much as an Army for mercantile interests here. Like putting down Gaddafi at all costs to protect the dollar, the Federal Reserve destroyers of the economy, and Wall Street. Like Iraq because they stopped accepting the dollar for oil. (If they did it for oil, where is that oil, and if they can screw over the tree-huggers so easy then why don’t they open up the domestic gushers?)

But that’s nothing new either. The problem with trusting government with education is that it is always a pro-state indoctrination. Like it took the Internet to find out the extent of some of the brutal orders they had to carry out against the Indians, against the Japanese-Americans in WW2, and so on.

..So now Americans are tired of war, even the good recruits are, tired of endless mercantile adventures anyway.

So now Obama is also keeping his promise made in 2009 to create a domestic security force (read: Police State) equal in funding and resources to the military, by building up all the federal enforcement agencies (there’s about a 100 of them), and merging local and state police in Fusion centers with lots of incentives and “terror” funding and military-grade weaponry. Oh yeah, there’s the Null Security Assholes.