Archive for August, 2010

Breitbart was set up

August 30, 2010

The story is still under wraps, but I’m convinced that Breitbart was set up by some agent provocateur, which deceiver acted like a whistleblower that had the goods on this Sherrod character and let him post the piece that implicated her for racism.

It was a recorded speech, which the NAACP did not release until Breitbart’s came out, and then they released it, which made it look like she was exonerated.

This was to distract the public from the blatantly racist tirades the NAACP speakers were spewing. With the decline of real racism into virtual disappearance, they are flailing and looking for a new cause.

But then this “exonerated” lady has now exposed herself as deserving of the “racist” description, because she is now accusing Breitbart of racism and suing him instead of the people that actually fired her!

The hypocrisy stinks like a dunghill.

So I’m posting a link here to add to Breitbart’s exposure. Naivete is not illegal, but accusations of racism where there is none is just blatant racism itself.



Mosab Yousef, Son of Hamas, Ground Zero Mosque

August 28, 2010

See here, the web site for the new book “Son of Hamas”, by the son of one of the founders of the Palestinian group, Mosab Yousef, who was shocked at finding “Love your enemies” in the Bible.

Son of Hamas :: Tyndale House Publishers

And on his blog see what he says about what the Koran says about the so called Ground Zero Mosque:

Son of Hamas

….And yes, it is perfectly legal and protected by the constitutional guarantee of religious freedom.

But it is also an affront to Allah.

Open your Qur’an and read sura 9, verse 107. I will reproduce it here in English for our Western readers:

“And there are those who put up a mosque by way of mischief and infidelity – to disunite the Believers – and in preparation for one who warred against Allah and His Messenger aforetime. They will indeed swear that their intention is nothing but good; But Allah doth declare that they are certainly liars.” (The Qur’an, sura 9, verse 107, Yusufali translation)

You can see that the language is much stronger in Arabic.

Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf may not intend “to disunite the Believers,” but his irresponsibility will accomplish the same end, even while he and his supporters, both Muslim and America’s progressive elite, “indeed swear that their intention is nothing but good.”

Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood, Hezbollah and the Taliban are counting on the inevitable outcome of such irresponsibility.

Even though he has become a Christian, here he laments that the damage that the attack that September in New York made on the image of Islam, but even more the damage that proceeding with it will do to peace and reconciliation. You know, the reason its promoters are saying they want to build it.

He also made predictions that are all too obvious:

Think for a moment. Do you really believe that Americans will just say “Oh, well” and move on while the 9/11 mosque is being built? Day after day, they will drive by, walk by on the way to work, and their anger and outrage will be renewed. The media will broadcast updates on the mosque’s progress, inflaming millions of viewers with every report.

How will Muslims react, then, when an angry citizen smears garbage on a wall of the mosque or covers it with blasphemous graffiti? How will they respond to protests and pickets? What if some hothead sets off a bomb?
Hatred and violence are not confined to Hamas, Hezbollah, al-Qaeda and the Taliban. They lie just below the surface of us all and only require sufficient heat to erupt.

And the violence will not be contained in Manhattan. You have seen how our brothers and sisters have reacted to books and cartoons. You can expect outraged mobs to burn homes and churches, attack embassies, kidnap and behead hostages not only in the Middle East but also in Africa and Asia, in obedience to the Qur’an’s mandate to defend the honor of Allah and his Prophet.

The blood—Muslim and non-Muslim—will be on the hands of the foolish Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf. But he and Islamists like him will blame everybody else, just as he blames America instead of bin Laden for 9/11. Just as he will not admit that Hamas is a terrorist organization. Instead, he provokes and blames the provoked.

And you will share the blame because you did nothing stop it when it was in your power.

The electrons were barely settled into the bits and bytes of Mr. Yousef’s cry, than now they decry the stabbing of one Muslim in New York for being a Muslim, at least so it is being reported. That cautionary note is from the history of hot button news stories, in which facts are revealed later that put an entirely different light on the story. For comparison sake, suffice it to say that one is a lot less than the 3,000 that were killed simply because they lived at the symbolic center of the American economy. Americans see it as a blow struck by Muslims who view it as another step in the violent conversion of their land to Islam

Blessed are the peacemakers, said Christ, for they shall be called the children of God. (Matthew 5:9)

That’s why I lament this too. It will make it harder to witness to Muslims, for its effect on both religions and everyone else.

And it is also a distraction from the war being waged on the American economy by its political enemies within. They needed a diversion worthy of a David Copperfield show, because Americans are no longer fooled by the condescending repetitive drivel that claims they are pushing us toward catastrophe to protect the poor. And Americans have been all too resilient to resist the attempts to convince them that the destruction of the nuclear family is an issue of (phony) “discrimination”. In fact, they feel rather angry at the insinuation that they are so stupid. Stay on topic, America.

In fact, seeing how Muslims themselves are beginning to make themselves more visible in condemning their violent brothers and coming to the defense of the Muslims that are slaughtered and massacred in the name of Allah the world over, it would be hard to design a better strategy meant to divide and conquer Muslims and Christians both to weaken them by enemies of both of them.

I have heard Christians speak in favor of quieting the anger and simply using the opportunity to witness to the Muslims who will be transiting the area. In fact, I would like to see someone call them on the talk about religious tolerance, and open a Christian witnessing center across the street or around the corner. They can and should avoid confrontation, offer support in any way possible, and offer Muslims the opportunity to find out the better side of following Christ.

Christians should also make better known the point of view of the Greek Orthodox Church in their desire to rebuild their own church which was destroyed on that day. After leading them on for nine years, and backtracking on promises made, and dealing deceitfully, the New York government authorities finally flatly refused to meet with them again. The claim that this is because they wanted money is just ludicrous in view of the fact that this was their own basis for talking to them in the first place, and the St. Stephens group says, they complied with everything the authorities demanded.

So maybe the authorities should call their bluff and publicly offer to agree to the terms that the St. Stephens committee says they already complied to. Ha. I’m calling their own bluff. No, they prefer to demonize.

So much for all this claims of “reconciliation”. Nancy Pelosi says she wants to open investigations on the 70 percent of Americans who are offended at the victory-mosque nature of the site selection by Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf. Well, some rebels against the Empire have already done their own investigation into “Follow the money”.

What they uncovered, and first heard (by me anyway) on the Michael Savage show, there is lots of money in the Middle East and Mayor Bloomberg is just about to open up a billion-dollar expansion of his already billion-dollar financial and commercial empire in the Persian Gulf area.

Meantime, the reaction of the Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf and his wife in news reports and interviews really show they are not interested in reconciling anything, in my opinion, calling the 70 percent of Americans that think it is motivated as a victory mosque “Islamophobes”. This just shows they are “Christophobes” and “truthophobes” and have no other defense at all except to claim they just want to help the healing. Now there is something obviously not true.

“Al-Arabiya Director Rejects Ground Zero Mosque” The Layalina Review | Layalina Productions, Inc.

There is one more important point about this whole thing. This imam, and Barack Obama, and all the supporters that have appeared as supporters of the ->location<- of this thing, they are all indignantly and consdescendingly telling opponents of the /location/ of this thing about religious freedom. And every opponent has pointed out there has never been a problem with the hundreds of mosques already open in the city of New York alone!

And many who have raised the issue of the location have offered to gladly help pay for a mosque somewhere else, even help raise money for it, so the simplistic and bigoted accusation of hate reflects like a mirror back onto the faces of the accusers.


(Where is St. Francis when you need him?)

Obama Expands the Police State: Even “Wired” is Alarmed

August 21, 2010

Even “Wired” is Alarmed:

Obama wants to get a DNA sample for a federal database from anybody who is arrested, automatically.

This is renegade government.

See what the the Fourth Amendment of U.S. Constitution says at

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

DNA is only collectable, according to that Amendment, only upon the granting of a warrant for same.

Not that judges are very independent minded lately. Where are the numbers on how many warrants they turn down, approve, how often they require more basis for it, and the percentages?

I followed with fascination that the US government in a case against a Palestinian professor’s visa were providing classified secrets to the court as evidence against him, while claiming the defense had no right to even know what it was!

America is following the United Nations strategy of building out the surveillance state globally in preparation for the universal human tracking device called the “mark of the beast” in the Bible, and his de-facto dictatorship. (Revelation 13)


Honduras 2009 Revisited

August 21, 2010

Google searches and browsing of some blogs still brings up links to places that retain the disinformation that went around the world spread by the major news wires, most of which carried very bad factual errors (also known as “lies”), and almost all of which left out important facts, and included commentary by “experts” who were wrong, and others who were completely clueless.

Everybody in Honduras knows Ambassador Hugo Llorens and the Americans tried to force Honduras to accept dictator Zelaya’s auto-coup to be president-for-life. His supporters know this too. Hugo Chavez knows full well that the Americans were helping his efforts to overthrow another republic in the Americas. If the CIA did anything on orders from Washington it was to try to help the wolves kill a small republic.

The meetings with high government officials the week previous to his trip to Costa Rica was where the constitutional institutions of Congress, Attorney-General, the Court, the Human Rights Obundsman, all were giving the US Ambassador a chance to tell Zelaya to desist and he did no such things.

What they leave out is also that right up to the night before Zelaya was arrested, Hugo Llorens was meeting at the Presidential Palace with Manuel Zelaya, as he made his plans for the most massive “electoral” fraud in Honduras’ history the next day. With them there was Zelaya’s lover, his Secy. of State Patricia Rodas, who was also the brains of his dictatorship, and others, as he made his plans for the most massive “electoral” fraud in Honduras’ history the next day, with Hugo Llorens sitting in to make sure it went well.

Note that Llorens had been playing the constitutional and legal authorities for fools. But Honduras enforced the law. What ever happened to the call for “the rule of law”?

Obama played the part of imperialist Yankee pig, but it was in trying to force them to accept this political coup by Zelaya and international forces, which more than 80 percent of Hondurans reject.

Hondurans hate Communism with extreme passion, and they do NOT want to follow the disastrous Castro-Chavez model. They have enough poverty already, thank you very much.

HALF A MILLION demonstrated in support of the constitutional succession that brought Micheletti to the presidency, as attested by crowd scans available on YouTube.

Contrary to the disinformation, the poor in Honduras were NOT fooled by this demagogue’s nonsense or his buddy Chavez of the International Socialist Mafia.

It ought to tell you something that the entire United Nations’ club of dictators and faux “democracies”‘ rulers went along with the efforts to force Communist tyranny upon one small nation, including the regimes that now rule over Americans, and regimes nominally Communist, socialist, “democratic”, Islamic, Christian, Buddhist, Hindu, Shinto/plus, and the rest.


The Lost Inventions of Nikola Tesla

August 15, 2010

This is the best list I’ve found so far of the highlights of Tesla’s inventions. The guy was pure genius, and way ahead of his time, but he gets so much more credit than we have been taught. It is revolutionary, and I hope some smart engineering students are paying attention. And hey, all you folks that are genuinely interested in keeping the environment clean, you pay attention too, because you’ll want to know what Tesla said about abundant clean energy availability.

I think Buck would enjoy most of it, maybe all, since he seems like kind of a tinkerer, and a lot of them deal with radio technology within the reach of the amateur.

It seems also that he believed the earth itself was a better transmitter of radio transmission than the air, if I understood the explanations correctly.

Tesla’s dream was power generation in hydroelectric plants that wirelessly transmitted power over great distances, and universally available.

Of note in the context of “clean energy” and “cheap energy” and “alternative energy” are things he said in his 1933 press conference, here snipped:

Tesla, at the press conference honoring his 77th birthday in 1933 declared that electric power was everywhere present in unlimited quantities and could drive the worlds machinery without the need of coal, oil, gas, or any other fuels. A reporter asked if the sudden introduction of his principle wouldn’t upset the present economic system…

Tesla replied, “It is badly upset already.”

At first blush it might sound like they had stupid reporters back then too, but then it may have been a leading question to get a good quote about “the present economic system”. The possibilities such an availability of energy would upset a few war machines maybe, but it would also dampen the control that centralized government in general has over the people.


king of Google Eric Schmidt says anonymity is dead (Privacy for me, but not for thee)

August 13, 2010

Can you believe this? The king of Google Eric Schmidt says anonymity is dead, get over it. He sang a different tune when CNET posted his own private information on-line and he banned their reporters from access. So now he does some semantical two-stepping and speaks out of two sides of his mouth, saying anonymity is not privacy.

Ten years after the king of Oracle, Larry Ellison, said “Privacy is dead, get over it”, here comes another guy, but this one the head of a company that banned CNET after they published his Google-available personal data. –And that was after Schmidt had said something about it’s harmless. Ask Ellison how much security he has to keep his privacy.

How about any trade secrets Oracle or Google has? How about the Bildeberg conferences? Who did he report to at Martha’s Vineyard in Maine after he won the election? Are they going to demand that all the Congress and WH staff and the Supreme Court judges all publicize the oaths they took in Masonic lodges?

How about some real transparency? Why is Barack Obama’s administration supporting Hugo Llorens meddling in Honduras? They pointed to a staff attorney’s opinion supporting their call to overthrow the Honduran constitution so they could reinstate a renegade runaway auto

No anonymity is the future of web in the opinion of Google’s CEO Eric Schmidt. He said many creepy things about privacy at the Techonomy Conference. The focus of the conference was how technology is changing and can change society. Schmidt’s message was that anonymity is a dangerous thing and governments will demand an end to it.

In an video interview with Julia Boorstin, CNBC Correspondent, Schmidt stated (starting at 5:13):

“Privacy is incredibly important,” Schmidt stated. “Privacy is not the same thing as anonymity. It’s very important that Google and everyone else respects people’s privacy. People have a right to privacy; it’s natural; it’s normal. It’s the right way to do things. But if you are trying to commit a terrible, evil crime, it’s not obvious that you should be able to do so with complete anonymity. There are no systems in our society which allow you to do that. Judges insist on unmasking who the perpetrator was. So absolute anonymity could lead to some very difficult decisions for our governments and our society as a whole.”

Whether it was a Freudian slip or a simple misstatement, Schmidt is correct; it is not obvious that if you are anonymous, you are therefore likely to commit a “terrible, evil crime.”

See it at this link:

Google CEO Schmidt: No Anonymity Is The Future Of Web | Community

Google Alarm is here:

Privacy Wars: How to Hide While Google is Watching You | Community

And from Reporters without Borders (It’s not just Google and Microsoft helping destroy anonymity):
BBC NEWS | Asia-Pacific | Yahoo ‘helped jail China writer’
Yes, boobs, I know that was five years ago. Why? Have they changed? Or is “Never forget” forgotten?


Some of the following might hit up against firewall language audits at work, so caveat emptor:

F***google | F.A.T.***google

…And from
F***Flickr: narc-free image gallery | F.A.T.


Judge Walker: Busted!

August 8, 2010

So says the headline: “Irate Prop. 8 backers say gay judge not impartial – Sacramento News:”

Get this, both a U-Cal professor Joslin AND this runaway judge expose their own moral arrogance with which they condemn others, condemning themselves by their own mouths, the judge in his own reasoning, and the professor in choosing this quote from the decision as an example of “impartiality”:

‘….Joslin said Walker’s 136-page decision, in which he declared that “moral disapproval alone is an improper basis on which to deny rights to gay men and lesbians,” reflected the legal determination of a seasoned jurist – not of an advocate for gay marriage….’

(1) First, that quote alone shows he is engaging in moral disapproval himself, and that

(2) ..and WITH NO FACTUAL BASIS WHATSOEVER, presumes to read the minds of all the citizens that voted YES to Proposition 8, telepathically one might assume,

(3) ..and presumes that they all voted “irrationally” on the basis of “moral disapproval alone”.

(4) I’m sure there were better arguments for Prop 8 before this gay judge by its advocates than reported, but it is an irrational judge that makes these presumptions, and if he did not request better arguments then he is incompetent.

(5) That might be something that reflects a “seasoned jurist” in the warped upside-down world of today’s wildly unconstitutional regimen, but not a rational jurist and not a just jurist.

(6) He presumes, along with many others, that there is a “right” to marry that they say is violated by the “equal protection under the law” clause. But then does he address the fact that nobody in their right mind before 1950 would be able to state that the Constitution clearly covered a constitutional “right” to marry anybody in the first place?

Or what moronic text at law lead them to believe that the developers Constitution could have ever envisioned that there would be a denial of the obvious distinction between the roles of natural man and natural woman?!

Of course that’s a rhetorical question, because these liars only use “constitutional review” to change the Constitution when it suits them, and they say so. The new definition of constitutionality in the schools of law across the country, is, “Whatever the Supreme Court says it is”.

But it’s not so. That’s another way of saying the Supreme Court is above the law.

Citizens should ask their politicians why have they never ever used their constitutional power to restrict the renegade decisions of the court?

But this arrogant unconstitutional judge also shows either a gigantic ignorance of the facts, or shows that he does not mind telling one of the biggest lie of gay advocacy –and being from the “Left Coast” as it’s been called, he cannot claim cover in ignorance:

“The evidence shows that, by every available metric, opposite-sex couples are not better than their same-sex counterparts; instead, as partners, parents and citizens, opposite-sex couples and same-sex couples are equal,” Walker wrote in his exacting, 136-page opinion.

That word “better” in this “exacting” opinion has its own subjectivity load, but the rest of flies straight against every available metric of every available study. Where did this idiot get this? Wikipedia?

Nevertheless, the mindless zombies of the clueless, their brains rewired by Big Brother’s life-long indoctrinations, cheer on these lies as if they were gospel. All they had to do was to say it for one month, and now everybody thinks there’s a “gay gene”, another lie that apparently this imposter “judge” at least bit his lip to keep from saying.


Obamacare won’t kill the Constitution, Acquiesence and Ignorance Will

August 8, 2010

The Virginia Secy of State says if they lose the case against Washington D.C. centrally controlled health care industry, it will kill the Constitution in America.

Obamacare could actually kill Constitution

In a video clip embedded in the same article, Congressman Pete Stark is quoted saying the federal government is “almost unlimited” –his words–in what the Constitution allows it to do in regulating your private life.

Find Amendment IV in the United States Constitution at this link, which references “the right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects”:

The United States Constitution – The U.S. Constitution Online –

It is interesting that the great contrast between this administration demanding that states respect the constitutional separation of powers (in the lawsuit against Arizona), at the same time they are trampling right past it in their attack on your health care choices.


Way to go to my home state of Missouri!

August 6, 2010

By 71.1% to 28.9% they shouted that they did NOT want federal tyranny and Obama’s socialist death scare shoved down their throats.,%20August%2003,%202010

They are killing the goose that laid the golden egg.

What made America so prosperous? It was the free exchange of goods and services. Voting to give yourself your neighbor’s money, with a cut to the middleman who gets what and takes the lion’s share, is just mind-boggling.

It is tragic to see so many people demanding their own enslavement, even with the overwhelming numbers who do not want it!

Now if they do fill the halls of political chambers across the country with Republicans, let us keep their feet to the fire, let them all feel the constant heat.

And tell them to get their greedy grubby filthy imperialist hands off Honduras, and let them do what they want with the ex-dictator Zelaya, and stop pushing on the pussy-willow soft Lobo!


Prop 8, Brownshirts, and Rule by the Arrogant Few

August 6, 2010

U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker on August 4, 2010, threw the rights of the voters of California to govern themselves and to deny consent, to the wolves of the modern Brown shirts. They had their own mini-Crystallnacht breaking windows and trashing churches across the state when they had their temper tantrum. They were seized by their conditioning under masters of Pavlov orchestration, oblivious to what awaits them after their masters are finished with them, just like Hitler’s Brownshirts.

The handful of socialist gays that work for the New World Order driving this truck off the cliff, after they finish off with forcing this thing down our throats and robbing us of any meaningful vote, they will continue their attack with the churches. As we saw with the riots in California after the voters expressed themselves, they will go on the attack against anybody who thinks differently.

That’s why they are most rabid when Exodus International comes to town, because here we have tens of thousands of former homosexuals who wanted out.

That’s why they sue to try to shut down Love Won Out. Oh, listen to the hate. Here in Miami I know several homosexuals and have rubbed shoulders with dozens, and they are not the few mouth-foaming attack dogs that have been trained and gathered together in California.

And it sounds from these selected excerpts that the defense was stupid. Can you believe it, the state sabotaging the thing. Nobody called anybody from Exodus International, I’m sure of it without even having to check.

Not for nothing the economy is sliding into the pits along with our dictators and rulers. The tyrants that are “granting” you rights that were never there in the Constitution, they will turn on you as soon as you lose your usefulness as cannon fodder and stomping stones to total rule, they will slaughter you like Hitler did the sodomite Brownshirts. ‘Nuff said.

Remember though, when you’re down an out the verse below my signoff.