Beware: Get your implant psych prep begins…

October 16, 2017

Ha. An AI implant that can transmit your thoughts to devices to control the house will also include embedded code to transmit CIA thoughts to your mind. or something like that.

Remember the 2016 leak of CIA tools that they put into systems?

For example,a s the leaks show, the CIA regularly puts spybots on computers that do their bidding and then report back and then leave tracks that point to Moscow.

They’re still trying the Hitler method with that Russia meddling tale. If Crony Media had hired Gepetto to make their copy writers and editors, their nose would grow so long youd have to walk around it to go to the other side of the couch in front of the newscast.

Hitler’s propagandists: Tell a lie big enough, loud enough, and long enough, and you eventually get them to believe it.

Hitler got his crowd, but he didn’t go as big as the American behemoth. Last figures I remember hearing was 600 bases in about 150 countries? No wonder we’re bankrupt!




Forensics analysis of LV

October 15, 2017


Fact: And the Facebook post of a survivor who was in the crowd and insisted there were multiple shooters has disappeared. She also died during a four-hour period in which she was at home alone. She had epilepsy. Call her Witness #1 for this post but call her death Coincidence #1.

Fact: Witness who called in to the Michael Savage show said there were multiple shooters. Witness #2.

Fact: Police scanners (transcripts) had police chatter about shooters. Shots from Mandalay Bay, from “Gate 7”. Multiple witnesses reporting shootings at other casinos too. Witness(es) #3.

Fact: Police timeline changed on when the security guard was shot. Police chief video at press conference shows a visibly upset (nervous) guy insisting that the changed timeline is the same as the original (I saw the video clip of his press conference). He refused to answer questions this time. Anomaly #1.

Fact: Campos, the guard who was scheduled to interview in Sean Hannity’s program on Fox News, and reportedly eager to tell his story, sent a message to Hannity just before air time, cancelling.
–Then, he was going to talk to reporters with his union representative present, then “disappeared” as they were exiting the room they were in. Union rep first says he’s clueless. Then later says he was informed he was taken to a “quick clinic”. Witness #4, Anomaly #2.

Fact: Accountant on valium prescriptions several months, in first reports not very knowledgeable of guns,
was slowly increasingly irritable and angry according to the girlfriend, (purportedly) executed a plan over several months, accumulated a small arsenal of weapons, killing some 53 people and injuring more than 500 during a shooting that lasted ten minutes.

Fact: There is a challenge to the FBI (or LVPD) from the acoustic forensics video posted above showing at least one second shooter during the concert event. There are (or were) various video clips available already on Youtube. One may assume that the police collected a number of cell phones for the video evidence they contain. A judge would surely grant a warrant for this.

Fact: The maintenance worker who was on the 32nd floor and waved down by Campos has been interviewed. He corroborated the story that said Campos was already hit several minutes before the rat-a-tat-tat at the crowd began.

Fact: MGM is reporting their dispute with the police version of events as a “difference”. The police chief claimed it was not a difference. (MGM does have a lot to lose in lawsuits)

Fact: Police still claim they have absolutely no idea of what the motive could have been. => But they did know at the very first press conference that they were absolutely sure there was no connection to ISIS or Islamist terrorism.

Fact: It is reported that the killer had no on-line presence at all.

Not a conclusion: I tend to hold believable (so far) that there was no connection to ISIS or Islamist activity. But to pull all this off.

Conclusion: None at all. Just a list of facts.
We know that there are very few journalists are TV news personalities asking the questions one would expect, and their viewers have.

Acoustic forensics video

October 15, 2017

Witness posts and videos saying there are multiple shooters are disappearing from Facebook and Youtube.

Here is a link to a professional demonstrating forensic acoustics FWIW, FYI:

Second Amendment

October 14, 2017

Second Amendment was a reference to the right and duty of citizens of a “free state” — a state where citizens are free– to protect themselves from their own government. That means the government and legislators have a conflict of interest in this issue.

We cannot trust governments with the individual natural right of self defense.

That’s why the opponents of the new Constitution made the Bill of Rights a condition for letting the Constitution get ratified. Because they did not trust the new government, and they thought it would restrain them. Note that ALL of the Bill of Rights recognize the rights of citizens to clip the wings of government power, and to remove their claws. The Bill of Rights does not protect anything. What restrains our governments is only WE THE citizens.

[In] a series of debates on socialism published in 1914, in which John Basil Barnhill said, “Where the people fear the government you have tyranny. Where the government fears the people you have liberty.”

-Apparently, it was not Jefferson who originated this wording: Source:

Hans Herman Hoppe and Brownshirt (antifa) thugs

October 13, 2017

Herman Hoppe just clarified what Paul was talking about in Romans 13. That instead of blindly condemning an occupying armed force that enforces restrains the worst “fellows of the baser sort” (a phrase in Acts about false witnesses against Christians).

Paul used the Roman sword for protection against an enraged Jewish mob in Jerusalem, invoking his right to appeal to Caesar as a Roman citizen.

But remember also, in another epistle, he warned Christians away from trusting in the secular authority.

Like it says in Isaiah, learning is “precept upon precept, line upon line”.

Texas shooting

October 12, 2017

Christopher Smith is a musicology teacher at the Texas college where a girl walked into a police station and shot one. He told NBC what he did when he got the notice of the lockdown sent out. After one student asked which students had concealed carry on their person, and several of them nodded (as to say Yes), he said:

“I went to the people who nodded and said, ‘I suggest you keep your weapons concealed, because if the police enter, they won’t be able to tell the difference between a good guy and a bad one.”

He thinks it should be illegal for students to bring guns on campus, and in a spectacular demonstration of oxymoronic thinking, uses this incident as an example of why he thinks so.

In case all the propaganda has muddied the issue, the fact that there were enough students to stop any killer who entered the place, is proof enough that you WANT them to be armed.

This should be enough for anyone to realize that they were safer with those students armed in case it was the BAD guy who came in.

I’m a pacifist but I do feel safer if there are a bunch of good guys around to stop a shooter. Armed civilians have stopped a LOT of people in just that way.

Those armed students were glad they were ready, you think?

But self-defense is not the most important reason that the Second Amendment should be treated as an absolute right of individuals to bear arms. Suzanna Hupp made the point to the Congress when they considered the ban on so-called “assault weapons” during the Bill Clinton years, which is still law today:

The most important reason for the Second Amendment, aka 2A, is to protect the citizens from “you guys”, meaning the politicians and the government itself.

NRA: No compromise: Ask Suzanna Gratia Hupp about what guns are most needed for

October 12, 2017

The video clip shows Chuck Schumer a couple times, watching her testify, and he can’t hide the most smug look (maybe he knew his ban was in the bag?):

In the above video clip there is a part about 30 seconds starting at about the five minutes, where she lays out the real purpose of the Second Amendment: “the 2Second Amendment. am is not about duck hunting. It is about our rights …all our rights (she waves her hand to show the non-legislators sitting behind her) to be able to protect ourselves from all you guys, up there (and she pointed to the legislators considering a new gun control law)”.

Gun control is borne in racism: Dred Scott

October 11, 2017

Chief Justice in the Dred Scott case used the fact that free “persons of the negro race”, if so granted, would also mean that they (and he) would have Second Amendment rights, and of course they had to have those gun control laws to prevent such Negros from having guns:

More especially, it cannot be believed that the large slaveholding States regarded them as included in the word citizens, or would have consented to a Constitution which might compel them to receive them in that character from another State. For if they were so received, and entitled to the privileges and immunities of citizens, it would exempt them from the operation of the special laws and from the police [60 U.S. 393, 417] regulations which they considered to be necessary for their own safety. It would give to persons of the negro race, who were recognised as citizens in any one State of the Union, the right to enter every other State whenever they pleased, singly or in companies, without pass or passport, and without obstruction, to sojourn there as long as they pleased, to go where they pleased at every hour of the day or night without molestation, unless they committed some violation of law for which a white man would be punished; and it would give them the full liberty of speech in public and in private upon all subjects upon which its own citizens might speak; to hold public meetings upon political affairs, and to keep and carry arms wherever they went. And all of this would be done in the face of the subject race of the same color, both free and slaves, and inevitably producing discontent and insubordination among them, and endangering the peace and safety of the State.

Press conference with CORE, the Congress of Racial Equality:

Can a Christian be a libertarian?

October 10, 2017

First, the primary identifier for a Christian should be “I am a Christian”. All other descriptives of beliefs and viewpoints a Christian has should be secondary.

Therefore, it is most proper to say you are a “libertarian Christian”.

So many people with wildly diverse beliefs call themselves Christian today, many doctrines of devils included, but a “Christian” in the context of this forum is most properly used for Bible believers. “Study to show thyself approved”. “To the word and to the testimony, if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them”.

I have lived many years, and I have been through the whole “spectrum” of beliefs, atheist and Communist after public school and Ivy League indoctrinations, then a missionary during the “Jesus People Movement” days, and now, working a secular job.

It now seems most apparent to me that the Biblical, godly view for a Christian’s relationship to society as a whole is the libertarian view. Of course before allowing myself this view, it had to check out with Scripture.

I’ll share some verses that are the basis for this, and it is not a new view in Christendom at all, but ancient. But in today’s modern times, paganism and atheism are so strong in the world that just as God has unleashed even stronger science as testimony to himself, and even so, this as Christian doctrine gets confirmation as being the best approach for society in general from secular theoreticians of the Austrian economics school of philosophy. (Which also has a great many Christians as well, Gary North and Laurence Vance being good examples.) I speak of the late Ludwig von Mises, the late Murray Rothbard, and Walter Block. Ayn Rand, rabidly anti-God anti-socialist author, is superfluous and irrelevant to the point. The three named economists are friendly to Christians in history, and even see Christianity as a historical driver in the advance of individual freedom.

In the times of the book of Joshua and Judges there was NO KING in Israel. There was NO government at all. The last verse in Joshua was both good and bad: “Everyone did what was right in his own eyes”. Good because there was no government, bad because it does not say they did what was right in God’s eyes.

When the elders came to Samuel and demanded a king, God told Samuel they had rejected God himself and not Samuel, and confirmed Samuel’s warning, that the king would send their sons to war and take their daughters to his palaces to prepare his “dainties”, and would confiscate burdensome parts of their increase to himself.

In Daniel 2, Daniel interpreted the king’s dream as a prophetic vision, showing the most important future empires to come, but then God sends down a rock that smashes into pieces all these kingdoms and replaces them all with his own eternal kingdom.

That means every one of those empires is NOT of God: Babylon, Medo-Persia, Greece, Rome, the two empires (Rome and Constantinople) that grew from the Roman Empire, and still to come, the Beast’s kingdom.

It is impossible to view America with God’s eye today and claim that it is a godly nation, or a Christian nation. The Israeli kingdom is not of God either, because they deny God’s own son.

Jesus showed the coin and said “Render unto Caesar what is Caesar’s, and unto God what is God’s.” But can one say that Caesar actually “owns” in that sense what he takes by force, or else?

Then in Matthew 18 Jesus gives a lesson on taxes asking whether the children of the kings and rulers and the ones that tell you what to pay, do they children have to pay them? No, just the fact that they take taxes by threat of force (theft) makes it a corrupt and sinful act. Nonetheless, pay them so as not to “offend” them, lest you get the other side of “Agree with thine adversary quickly”.

In other words, pay taxes as much as you must, so you can use the rest to do God’s work.

As to Romans 13, the authorities Paul describes there do not describe rule by Caligula, or Nero (who beheaded him).

There is one Baptist pastor of a mega-church in the United States today who is telling whoever listens that Trump can do anything because Romans 13. NOT SO!

“Here a little, there a little. Precept upon precept, line upon line”. So does Romans 13 discredit First Samuel, Daniel 2, and Elijah’s pronouncements against Ahab and Jezebel, and his killing of 300 prophets of Baal –the official religion of the land? NO!

To qualify for Romans 13, a government must follow the description of it in the passage.

Does the Trump administration qualify? It looks increasingly like he’s either boxed in by the government he supposedly heads up, or he was not being totally sincere in his pronouncements, or something in between.

Some of us know there is not only an entrenched “Deep State”, that the Federal Reserve is the most visible Money Changers rulers in the land today, but there is also a “shadow government” (that Oliver North mentioned), but “people of the Prince that shall come” (Daniel 9), and more.

Jesus told the apostles that he that wants to be great among the Gentiles seeks power, seeks to rule over them, but in the kingdom of God he that would be great will be the servant of them.

“Thou shalt not steal” is the commandment that makes taxation a sin.

The Mark of the Beast will tell the tale anyway.


Politicized Sustainability Threatens Planet and People

October 8, 2017

How about let’s talk about economic sustainability?

They never get into details about that. They are fools. At least most sane people understand you can’t even beat some sense into them, so just let them prattle on.

Though thou shouldest bray a fool in a mortar among wheat with a pestle,¬†yet¬†will not his foolishness depart from him . — Proverbs 27:22