I enjoyed the way the Dam Dim Dems exposed themselves as so totally vicious and unhinged, and the way their main witnesses exploded in their faces. They’re scapegoating Avenutty and pretending Ford is still “believable”. I don’t think the Damn Dim Dems would dare try to impeach Kavanaugh even if they take both houses of Congress in November, because they’d have to bring up Ford again.
But what’s most revealing about both parties, and whoever bumped Kavanaugh to the head of the line after the election, are (1) that the Dum Dam Dim Dems refused to pick up on the most damning things they could have brought up against him, and (2) that somebody waiting until after Trump was elected to put Kavanaugh’s name on the public list of possible SCOTUS nominees.
(1) Kavanaugh, witness Knowlton, and Vince Foster:
The Daily Telegraph revisited an article they had done during the days of the Ken Starr special counsel and the Vince Foster investigation.
One thing was Kavanaugh’s methods when interrogating the first witness on the scene where Vince Foster’s body was found in what official Washington decided was a “suicide”. Kavanaugh grilled him in what people present called a “character assassination”. Kavanaugh was working for Ken Starr at the time. (One of the worst and most stupid naive things D. James Kennedy ever did was to give a “Statesman Award” to Ken Starr).
Quoting the AmbroseEvans-Pritchard article in the Daily Telegraph from https://hat4uk.wordpress.com/2018/10/03/kavanaugh-hearings-why-dont-the-democrats-want-to-go-near-yesterdays-telegraph-article/
‘Miquel Rodriguez (a Kavanaugh colleague) had resigned earlier from the Starr investigation after a bitter dispute.His resignation letter – later leaked – said he was prevented from pursuing investigative leads, that FBI witness statements did not reflect what witnesses had said, that the suicide verdict was premature, and that his grand jury probe was shut down just as he was beginning to uncover evidence….The nub of the dispute was over compelling evidence of a wound in Foster’s neck, which contradicted the official version that Foster shot himself in the mouth and had essentially been suppressed…..[the FBI then ‘lost’ the photos]….I interviewed the first rescue worker on the scene and when I asked him about the mouth wound, he grabbed me, and said with frightening intensity: “listen to me buddy, Foster was shot right here,” jabbing his finger into my neck. He said the FBI had pressured him too into changing his story, and the official narrative was a pack of lies.’
The contradiction between the official version of what the first witness said to the FBI, versus what the witness said later in emphatic denunciation of the official report, was only one of the big holes in the official version of the Vince Foster investigation.
No way was either party going to revisit those days. Democrats because it would publicize the sins of the Clintons again, and Bill Clinton’s history of harassment and rape would get thrown into their faces. Republicans would have to account for the way they accepted Ken Starr’s cutting the legs off his own investigation. He made Paula Jones the public face of the investigation, much to the delight of the Democrat Party and their Mob Media spokescreatures.
(2) Legal support for the Patriot Act
During his work for the Bush administration, Kavanaugh wrote up justifications for the Patriot Act. In totally Orwellian fashion the Bush White House said the Patriot Act gave “law enforcement” some “necessary tools” to protect the public by swooping up the emails, conversations, browser activity, and comings and goings, and library book records, of every member of the public. (Just like they need to protect the public from bad guys by banning the tools that the public uses to defend itself against the bad guys.).
