Archive for December, 2022

Nazis and Zionists were allies?

December 30, 2022

From Chuck Baldwin, a God’s eye view of Zelensky and Ukraine, Israel and Bibi, and the historical Zionist-Nazi alliance

Supposedly strange bedfellows indeed. Zelensky a nominal Jew, president in a country where the dominant fighting force in the Kiev-led Ukrainian Armed Forces is the Azov Batallion, many of which have appeared in photographs with the swastika plainly visible on their helmets.

We are indeed entering into the last phase of the end times.


Natural Rights vs God-given Rights

December 25, 2022

In nature, there are predators and prey, carnivores, herbivores and omnivores. There are some where males fight to the death to establish dominance over a troop.

Some libertarians talk about “natural rights” when talking about humans.

It is my belief that natural rights are a logical extension of the obvious and natural differences between humans and animals. The atheist libertarians that have most articulated the philosophy, for the most part, have extrapolated the NAP (and other axioms and conclusions) from those differences, and respective characteristics, to get to “natural rights” ideas.

From my perspective, Austrian economics is the best example of the application of eternal principles articulated in the Bible, even the 10 Commandments. Atheists and agnostics reject the 1st Commandment but are still responsible for living up to at least the NAP as a logical “corollary” of the NAP.

But nature operates according to certain rules, with scientific disciplines purporting to be about teasing those rules out from observations of nature.

But you cannot define nature as a coherent entity with creative powers. The law of entropy is an axiomatic principle that recognizes that nature acts in the way described. Nature has no independent agency and cannot overrule itself.

But human agency can. Some may say there is no free will, but ask one if he can change his mind if he wants to. He might say no, but many of them have changed their mind. Most physicists acknowledge quantum fluctuation, for example, and the “uncertainty principle”.

But now atheists that recognize principles of Austrian economics and how the free market works better than other economic models in human society, also have to explain why the NAP that is necessary for a true free market, does not work for ants.

“They’re not human” is an obvious answer, but when you ask them why humans are different they have to fall back on non-theistic answers that do not really explain it, if humans came to be through the same processes as ants.

So what is the essence in nature that requires natural rights?

My answer is that there has to be an “intentional agency” that made the rules. The rules that nature has not choice but to live by, and the rules that are implied by how human societies work best. Even an atheists like Mises and Rothbard have deduced a corollary of “the law of love” as the minimum rule for society to work in a way that is the optimum best for the aggregate, the NAP: no one person supplanting another’s volition by force, coercion, or fraud.

To sum it up, even atheists who subscribe to the NAP are able to deduce certain principles from certain axioms of human action, rules that explain how nature actually works in human society. It can even explain what happens when some humans violate the NAP.

They start from nature. But nature also has rules and Mises started from scratch from those rules in “Human Action” to derive how human societies and economics actually work.

But looking at nature, you can also make certain sure deductions. The laws of entropy, for example, there is no law of nature that any branch of science has been able to come up with an explanation as to why the laws of entropy and the strong anthropic principle can be universal rules for the cosmos without being able to deduce that there is an intelligent agency to engineer it, with the power to create it.

Sad Little Man

December 20, 2022

This video is going to go viral, about fascist psychopath Fauci:

Brazil still boiling

December 14, 2022

Some police in Brazil brutally beat an indigenous leader who very loudly demanded action against the fraudulent election in Brazil that got communist Lula the fraudulent vote for president.

The indigenous are up in arms because they favored Bolsonaro overwhelmingly. But the purported vote count in indigenous areas was ZERO for Bolsonaro. They are understandably incensed.

So the communists are exposed as being the ones who want to keep indigenous and people of color –and working-class whites!– under the thumb of the white elites.

Time to unperson QAnon

December 13, 2022

I never bought into QAnon It played to people’s hopes that there was some clandestine group that was getting ready to block the unconstitutioal tyranny coming from the Left.

I became increasingly skeptical, especially when the Qanon posts started saying “Trust the plan”.

“Trust the plan” was obviously a suggestion that they gullible do nothing at all.

See how that turned out? Ask God for discernment.

More doublespeak unraveled

December 9, 2022

Another hit in my series of posts keeping English alive against perverted onslaughts:

aka (my dubbing) the “No Respect for English Act”:

Or maybe better yet, “Bring back Sodom Act”.

Anthropic principle and evolution

December 8, 2022

There are two “versions” of the anthropic principle. There is one of those that was a “defense” against the other one.

Spontaneous universe defenders argue against the straw man, the redundant version, that says of course we fit this universe because here we are. That argument should fail Logic 101 class and it is indeed meaningless.

But then there they go, the same ones, ever searching anyway for a non-circular argument of the holy grail of an origins theory that fits. Big bang, inflation, variable speed of light, ever trying to find a reason to doubt the TRUE anthropic principle.

The fact is, creationists winning the debates is more than arrogant “scientists” dismissing it claim. The spontaneous universe believers are the ones who agreed to debate because they thought it would be as easy as disproving the flat earth idea. Oops.

So then they took a page from the clerics who banned Bible reading for the masses so now they say nobody could understand “evolution” because it takes years of learning. Bait and swich word. It takes years of indoctrination to undo logical thinking

You talk about it takes “being able to understand or comprehend”. And yet the main reason creationists won those debates is because they understand the atheist theories better than the atheists.

Don’t know where you get your info, but none other than paleontologist Stephen Gould based his entire theory on “punctuated equilibrium” based on the fact that THERE ARE NO transitional forms between groups of animals, meaning there are nothing but great gaps, chasms really, between the goups. Canines and felines, but no transitions. His theory says Darwinian evolution happened based on the evidence that there is no evidence for it between groups.

Denying the mountains of evidence accumulated that cannot account for the spontaneous origins myth is no evidence at all.

There are no refutations other than hand-waving and “just add time” and muzzling the kids that say the Emperor has no clothes:

_1_ Mathematicians at a combined math-and-biology conference in the 1980s told the biologists to come up with a better explanation than “natural selection” because they odds were astronomical against.

_2_ Darwin himself admitted the fossil record was a refutation against his theory, but said he was confident that ongoing discoveries would fill it in. So today’s fossils, as admitted by Stephen J. Gould, are stronger refutation still. (Thomas Huxley told him shut up, don’t admit anything, and the faithful followers have followed suit since).

_3_ When DNA was first discovered, instead of questioning how the three-legged stool of DNA, mRNA, and the cellular environment –all absolutely necessary for even one living cell–, the faithful only proclaimed it was an explanation for Darwinism.

_4_ Then along came epigenetics around the 1190s-2000s and biologists publicly wept that it was trashing everything they knew about biology. (Thomas Kuhn warned them but by then he was into trashing free markets).

_5_ Then came “Irreducible Complexity”, pointing to the organic molecular machines that cannot work without every individual component in place and doing its particular functions. Meaning there no transitinal precedent would work to get there. The cell has millions of them.

_6_ along the way, biologists and anatomists kept finding “vestigial organs”. I laughed all along at that one. Like the human tailbone, which serves to anchor absolutely necessary muscles in that area.And snake and whale leg bones, which were once “vestigial”. but serve to help anchor the animals during copulation. A function necessary for propagation of the species).

_7_ Hundreds of cellular and organic processes similarly lacking in any reasonable theoretical evolutionary precedent. Blood clotting requires some many steps in reaction to exposure to air that ALL and EACH have to happen quickly, or death comes quick. (Hemophiliacs). One cell in the retina gets hit by ONE PHOTON and starts a lightning quick chain reaction of also some 12 or so steps,and it all has to immediately snap back in place for the next photon.

ON AND ON AND ON. There are HUNDREDS more examples.

Not to mention the multitude of physical and scientific and astronomical facts that have brought

Brazil is boiling

December 5, 2022

Lula’s operatives only got him a very small squeeze into a majority, in an election that seems to have all Brazil convinced it was stolen.

Tens of millions have filled the plazas and the streets around them in protest against the election.

When the Supreme Court decreed that Lula could run for president again, in clear violation of the clear language of the Brazil constitution, one of the members of that court loudly quit in protest, denouncing the Chief Justice as a corrupt collaborator with the communist Lula, and denouncing the decision as illegal. He is demanding that President Bolsonaro invoke Article 142 which gives the military forces power to intervene in disputes between other branches of the government. I have read explanations of it, and personally am not so sure they have to wait for an invitation.

It looks like the military forces are preparing for something. There have been soldiers appearing in the favelas, where the “Red Guard” drug cartel militias have their base. They have been working with Lula’s communist gang for a long time. They’ve been making arrests and have apparently a couple of the top leaders of them. They would apparently be the most likely troublemakers in any pending operation. The operation has apparently begun principally in the smallest towns in the country.

Military vehicles, tanks and trucks, have been shown in videos moving through certain highway.

Tens of thousands of indigenous tribes of the Amazon have surrounded government buildings in Brasilia, demanding that the legislators and others of government take immediate action against the supposedly imminent inauguration of the scourge of Brazil. There is a video of one indigenous tribal leader in full headdress ranting loudly and angrily at them in the government and demanding action. It sounded like he gave them 30 days before they start taking action themselves.

Turns out the fake environmentalists are not friends of indigenous peoples, and neither are the leftists in general. The Indians in Brazil are direct victims of fake greenies’ actions. Call them freenies. They don’t deserve any word anywhere near sounding like “green”.

It’s looking like Matthew 24 out there, folks, buckle up.