Why None Dare Call it Treason

December 21, 2019

“Treason doth never prosper: what ’s the reason?
Why, if it prosper, none dare call it treason.”

Zero Aggression Principle

December 1, 2019


Who is a libertarian?

Zero Aggression Principle (“Zap”)

“Zero Aggression Principle”:

A libertarian is a person who believes that no one has the right, under any circumstances, to initiate force against another human being for any reason whatever; nor will a libertarian advocate the initiation of force, or delegate it to anyone else.

Those who act consistently with this principle are libertarians, whether they realize it or not. Those who fail to act consistently with it are not libertarians, regardless of what they may claim.
— L. Neil Smith

Formerly called the “Non-Aggression Principle”, or “NAP”

Murder by Gun Control

December 1, 2019

Found from a link at https://ncc-1776.org/..


Murder by Gun Control
By L. Neil Smith

Why is everybody being so damned polite?

No sane individual living in the last days of the 20th century would knowingly welcome Nazis, the KGB, the Khmer Rouge, the ATF, or the FBI into their homes. We’ve learned too much from what happened to Jews in Germany, Kulaks in Russia, “landlords” in China, everybody in Cambodia, and victims of state terrorism at Ruby Ridge and Waco.

But let the Jackbooted Thugs’ Ladies’ Auxiliary slap on makeup and broomstick skirts, let them prattle in squeaky little girl voices and breathe their vegetarian breath all over us, and for some reason we think we have to ask them in and offer them chamomile tea.

Well, to hell with that. I used to give a lecture at the local university that began like this: “Until this morning you could plead ignorance for positions you take or fail to take on the moral and political issues of the day. When you leave this classroom an hour from now, having heard the facts I’m about to present, it’ll either be as a brand new libertarian, or as a fully self-aware fascist monster.”

Today I say the same to politicians, bureaucrats, trigger happy cops, Handgun Control, Inc., Colorado Governor Bill Owens, and those so miserably lacking in originality that they had to plagiarize Louis Farrakan (of all people) and launch a “Million Moms March”. Also, anybody else who thinks it’s morally acceptable to use the hired guns of government to take everybody else’s guns away.

Gun control may have felt like a nice, warm, fuzzy idea to its advocates back in the 1960s. However today, owing to a great deal of serious legal and historical scholarship — and a series of horrifying but highly educational events — anyone who wishes to violate the fundamental covenant on which this nation is based, by attempting to outlaw personal weapons, has to get past three extremely inconvenient but absolutely incontrovertible facts.

(1) Every year, in this nation of more than a quarter billion individuals, a few thousand (three quarters of them suicides) are killed with firearms, while millions of Americans successfully use personal weapons to save themselves and others from injury or death. Guns save many, many times more lives than they take.

(2) In every jurisdiction that has made it even microscopically easier for individuals to carry weapons, violent crime rates have plummeted by double-digit percentages. Vermont, where no permission of any kind is required to carry a gun, is named in many respectable surveys as the safest state to live in.

(3) More telling and urgent, every episode of genocidal mass murder in history has been preceded by a period of intense disarming of the civil population, usually with “public safety” or “national security” as an excuse. According to Amnesty International — hardly a gang of right wing crazies — in the 20th century alone (in events entirely separate from war), governments have slaughtered more than a hundred million people, usually their own citizens.

The U.S. is far from immune. Look up “Operation Keelhaul”.

Clearly, if those millions had been armed, they couldn’t have been murdered by their own governments. And if the governments hadn’t known where all the weapons were and who possessed them, the people couldn’t have been disarmed. It follows, then, that no amount of gun control — especially “soft” measures like registering guns or gun owners — is reasonable or safe. Those who tremble at the idea of personal weapons — “hoplophobes” is the diagnostic term — are fond of saying that guns are made for only one purpose. Well, gun control serves only one purpose, too — the incapacitation and extermination of whole peoples.

That’s why we call it by its right name: “victim disarmament”.

If you think it can’t happen here, ask Donald Scott (look him up, too). Ask Vicky and Sammy Weaver. Ask 82 innocent men, women, and children (two dozen beautiful, harmless, helpless little children) from the Seventh Day Adventist church at Mount Carmel near Waco, Texas. Oops, you can’t ask them, can you? Because they’re all dead

Say it loud, say it often: The Impeachment farce is a cover-up

November 5, 2019

Mostly Schiff, also Pelosi, are providing cover fire for the coup plotters in the FBI, DOJ, and the CIA, and for the ongoing Operation Mockingbird, probably rebranded internally.

They cover their own “conspiracy theories” by calling it accusations of “collusion”.

This is a cover operation for the four Congressmen who went to Ukraine to pressure the foreign government to give them something to use against the elected president.

They are actually using foreign policy, a constitutional presidential prerogative, to overthrow the president.

Fascist Left on the march

October 12, 2019

Saw a piece on lewrockwell.com complaining (rightly so) that conservatives pointed to the “transgender” kids there, instead of sounding the alarm about the Crazy Left totalitarian promises to put an end to free speech (bakers and same-sex wedding cakes) and freedom of association (unisex bathrooms), and free exercise of religion.

The dozens *hundreds?” of beatdowns by antifa fascist browshirts of people leaving the Trump rally in Minnesota last night (11 October 2019) did not get much attention, but they are a warning of what the political season will look like.

There is a bottomless bag of money financing the attacks on traditional American and family values, and pushing for totalitarianism. The Internet has help exposed the villains.

The founder of the Taxpayer Party (now called the Constitution Party) had a rallying cry, to “Defund the Left”. Those funds are student loan guarantees and federal direct student loans, political research grants, the CIA (which left off being rightist a long time ago if it ever was), tort law, “education” funding, on and on.

Their end, along with man’s abuse of power, will end pretty soon. Even of the Beast, Daniel 11 says “he shall come to his end, and none shall help him”.

Great Orators of the Democratic Party….good stuff

October 11, 2019

Forwarded from a friend’s email:

Somebody please set Bergoglio straight

September 25, 2019

Bergoglio, “just happened” to get “elected” Pope by the cardinals, after Pope Benedict’s “swift” abdication that followed a blocking by the SWIFT clearinghouse busybodies, has said that “money is the devil’s dung”.

That’s interesting. Somebody should ask Bergoglio what the Vatican is going to with at least $700 billion of the “devil’s dung” in their possession.

And while you’re at it, since he said it is the duty of all Catholics to “obey the United Nations”, ask him whether it Paul really asked the Sanhedrin (rhetorically of course) whether they should obey man, or God? Preface the question with reference to the UN push for universal abortion and compulsory contraception, and their push against motherhood with their population control policies, and the UN push to force acceptance of LGBTQ special privileges, like banning of any speech that questions these Romans One deviations from biological science.

A story goes around about a father who explained to his son that his membership in the Communist Party in the Soviet Union was like a radish: red on the outside, white on the inside. In the days of the Cold War, and still today, “red” is considered the color of the Communists and the Socialist International. I’ve wondered about that map that suddenly appeared on the Internet contrasting counties Republican-majority votes with Democrat-majority votes with the colors really backwards.

Bergoglio, why do you cling to so much devil’s dung?

Red Flag Council

September 24, 2019

This one is worth reading entire:


This push for “red flag” laws is one of the most diabolical things they’ve come up with.

It’s like they did focus groups and found the easiest next step in moving by steps to a complete gun ban on decent folks, was by these things.

No due process, no day in court, no way to face the accuser, just send the SWATS to get your guns.

Antifa would never use such a fascist tactic to disarm good guys would they? And trust judges to be fair?

Not even that Judge on Fox News. She argued for confiscation.

L. Neil Smith says he’s a one-issue voter, and it’s this one. He has a point. It exposes the blatant tyrannical philosophy of the ACLU, really, because they were always on the side of the collective on this one, pretending the Second Amendment was really a guarantee that government could form armies.

Libertarians and Christians

September 1, 2019

The “tactic” of breaking any law you choose to has been soundly and roundly blasted by most libertarian thinkers. It’s counterproductive. Ron Paul showed much more effective strategy.

And libertarian Christians are armed with the love of God and the truth. BUT some civil disobedience is effective as in the kinds of laws that Martin Luther King broke and advocated.

Competing with the drug cartels (including the CIA) is so dangerous and fraught with gangs that compete against the biggest gang in Washington, that’s plumb crazy. Go figure, the biggest lobbies against marijuana legalization in Colorado were law enforcement agencies and the Mob.

Alternative currency is used by anybody. It’s been de facto recognized even. But do your research.

A very, very large number of libertarians like myself oppose illegal entry as it is today. Right now, it is a massively subsidized operation, with financing from billionaire money interested in taking more power, like George Soros and the Kochs. By subsidized I mean both the internal welfare magnet of freebies at your expense, and actual NGO money directly or indirectly driven and organized as a pure leftist operation. It is a push to establish a one-party power regime in the States. Because the globalist fascist Left is impatient and they see nationalist movements as a threat to the totalitarian regime they plan for. Their idea is to overwhelm the election numbers with pliant groups that don’t have the cultural legacy of the Bill of Rights.

With private property, there will be no such thing as “open borders” at all. Property owners set the rules. Right now, the ranchers with land on the border are powerless by orders of the federal government.

Subsistence farming is a good idea for those who want to do it. One family in Tennessee got completely, 100 percent off the grid. No utilities. They were fined by the local authorities under some bogus pretext. But they won their case, IIRC.

Tax evasion. Never mind every parliament and congress in the world evades taxes by law, like Nigel Farage pointed out so well in the video that went viral of a speech he made in the European Parliament.

Team Tucker Carlson punked by an anti-Clinton report at left-side Grayzone

September 1, 2019

Tucker’s team is apparently “punked” by a story that ties Hillary Clinton to a right-wing “coup” attempt in Honduras. Follow along here to get the unsung details

The American public was hit by a flood of fake news in 2009 over the events that took place in Honduras that year. That was when the president, supposedly “democratically elected”, tried to arrange a “referendum” or “survey” that would show a majority vote for a new constitutional assembly. later on, a secret office owned by their State Department was discovered, complete with the pre-programmed “results” of said “referendum”.

Manuel Zelaya came out as a full-blown Chavista in 2008, and accelerated his plans when he returned from a Central America-Caribbean presidential summit held in Santo Domingo, where the keynote speaker was none other than super-powerful socialist fascist billionaire George Soros.

There is absolutely no meddling in elections in the States that comes close to the massive worldwide meddling of finances and directives from Soros, who said on tape in an interview once that his fondest memories were as a child going with his caregiver Nazi enforcer to confiscate wealth from Jewish families in Hungary. His Jewish father was friends with this Nazi official, and had little George living with the Nazi friend as insurance for his safekeeping.

A woefully under reported story about the national socialists is the cooperation between them and Zionists in the forced exile of Jews to Palestine. Among other things. Three separate friends I have had who were Orthodox Jews have told me respectively, that (1) Hitler’s mother was Jewish, (2) he had an uncle that was Jewish, and/or (3) one of his parents was Jewish. In one interview I personally viewed on Cable, a writer on war crimes said that one strange little fact was that Eichmann told his captors that he knew Hebrew and began to sing a song in Hebrew to them (one that his victims sang in the prison camps). Another thing I picked up from a sycophantic biography of the Rothschild family, was that for a few months, with the Rothschilds under “house arrest”, Eichmann regularly visited their mansion and spent the night playing cards and chatting with them. Enough though for this post about Soros and his ilk.

Web site Grayzone ran a story by reporter Anya Parampil claiming that a section of the first edition of Hillary’s memoirs book was gone in the more recent edition. The section was where she claims Hillary Clinton “bragged” about her intervention in the “coup” in Honduras in 1009. This deceitful article claims the coup had “bipartisan” support.

This is another lie that keeps getting extra mileage from the Global Fascist Left, aided and abetted by their “fellow travelers” (as communists used to call them) that disguise themselves as “liberal” or “conservative”. As a matter of fact, the Obama regime did NOT engineer the arrest of Manuel Zelaya.

In the Honduras government’s actions in 2009, their only role was to obey and carry out court orders issued at the request of duly legitimate civil authorities totally in accordance with legal procedures. The governmental attorney general, at great risk to his own person, sued several times in the courts to stop the illegal actions.

Zelaya came back from that summit two months later and refused to submit the next years’ budget as required by the Constitution, which had a back-up provision that said in the absence of a budget for any reason, the previous budget was automatically applied to the next one.

But Zelaya began diverting state resources to his “referendum” plan. He ordered the Election Commission (constitutionally an independent “fourth branch” of government) to draw up plans to add an extra “cuarta urna” to the forthcoming November 2009 election. The Electoral Commission reminded him that only Congress has that authority, so No Sir. The courts agreed. Meantime, the “Fiscal General” (like an Attorney General) brought suit and the highest Court banned the effort. Constitutional amendments and calls for an assembly are an exclusive power of the Congress, not the executive, and most people would agree it should not be easy. That’s why the powers in control in the U. S. have simply bypassed it so much and gotten the SCOTUS to continue expanding federal government powers. Centralized power by attrition.

So then Zelaya changed tactics and said he would do a “survey” on July 29, 2009. The attorney general again sued, this being the same thing under a different guise, and ruled it unconstitutional. Zelaya said he would do it anyway.

It is important to note that NO INTERNATIONAL NEWS SERVICE was covering ANY of this to any significant degree. Also, meantime, there were MASSIVE demonstrations by Hondurans filling the streets with protest against the machinations of Zelaya, aided and abetted by the Chavez regime.

AND THE AMERICAN AMBASSADOR HUGO LLORENS PUBLICLY SUPPORTED THIS CHAVISTA PUTSCH. In another of those numerous historical “coincidences”, Hugo Llorens had an important post in the American Embassy when Chavista took power and at the time of that coup in 2002 against Chavez. (Which to me had the appearance of an auto-coup meant to expose his opposition within the military forces.)

He was used in public announcements as supporting this referendum. In his cables exposed later on Wikileaks justifying Zelaya’s auto-coup attempt to the State Department. He claimed there was “no proof” that Zelaya planned on staying in power, and that was a lie, in spite of ZELAYA pushing for re-election on video. I have it on reliable sources (my wife is from Honduras) that Zelaya had given a million dollars to at least one member of his cabinet, telling him “Stick with me, I’m going to be president-for-life”.

My wife went to school with Zelaya. In class, when the teacher said “anybody” could be elected president, he raised his hand and said “I’m going to be president”. All the entire class roared in laughter, because he was the slow one in class. And not very studious.

I’m convinced the “brains” behind his plans in Honduras was his secretary of State, Patricia Rodas. She was sent to Cuba for advanced studies by her father.

I have not read her book nor will I waste my time, but whatever she said, SHE CALLED MICHELETTI PERSONALLY TO ORDER HIM TO RESIGN, presumably so she could MANEUVER the would-be dictator back in power.

When he said Forget it!, she asked “What will it take?” (Wink wink) He said, “Only an invasion”. What HRC said she was afraid of was true. She had to know about the demonstrations against the coup schemes. She said she didn’t want Honduras to end up totally isolated like Maoist Albania had been so many years, cut off from all international trade and diplomacy.

Because like Micheletti told Greta Susteren in that interview, all of Honduras was willing to go it alone and eat rice and beans, to get rid of the Chavista socialist threat to the country.

Hondurans told me during a demonstration in front of the Honduran consulate in Miami that they had voted for Obama, but they were going to vote against him in the next election because he joined the entire United Nations assembly to condemn Honduras.

After denouncing the U.S. earlier, he did all but ask for an invasion of the country.

Remember the OAS secretary-general Jose Miguel Insulza, who supervised the OAS condemnation of Honduras? He got his political start as a political officer in the communist government of Salvador Allende. He “fortunately” found himself in Paris when Pinochet overthrew Allende. Insulza condemned the Honduran “coup” and repeated the fake news that Zelaya had been exiled “in pajamas” until he had a meeting with Honduran officials, after which he did not repeat it. Neighbors saw him escorted out of the Palace in a full formal suit.

What the news reports did not divulge was that U. S. Ambassador Hugo Llorens was present in the Presidential Palace the night before at a meeting with Manuel Zelaya and the collaborators in their planning for the pivotal step, the “survey”, in their plans to take over.

There are many more details about this, but people do not do enough searching for truth. Apparently not even the team does research for Tucker Carlson. He has already repudiated libertarianism based on both a lack of original understanding its basis and some “libertarian” think tanks that offer some decidedly un-libertarian views as if they were. Many sincere libertarians with solid and consistent credentials, also get some things wrong, as in for example the billionaire-subsidized and welfare-supported mass immigration waves both into Europe and into the United States. Which is also jacked up by propaganda spread in Central America by leftists.