Black pastors love KJB – They are not fooled, they love Jesus

I came across a blog post that asked why black pastors generally love the King James Bible. The URL is gone away from me, but here is my reaction to that one. The writer considered it a question, despite its association with the abolitionist movement in England and presumably America. He named historical abolitionists that used King James passages to condemn slavery. He refers to Martin Luther King’s profuse salting of his speeches with scriptures quoted from the King James Bible.

He poses this observation as a question of why because he mixes in mentions of descendants of King James who justified slavery. A tortuous and twisted road to try to plant doubt in the minds of less discerning readers.

The KJB has ZERO blame for slavery. Those teachers that supposedly twisted the KJB scriptures to “justify” slavery are in a league with those who twist it to claim that the son of Sodom was inhospitality, and even seminary professors who claim Genesis One is a veiled Babylonian creation myth.

In fact it is modern per-versions that promote horrible untruths, even using the word “slave” where it rally says “servant”as in the KJB.

Now comes an apparent effort to deceive our black brethren with lies of the Devil about the KJB, even while appearing neutral and pretending a fake concern for our darker skinned brethren.

The truth is, Satan hated the King James Bible. Wherefore by their fruits he shall know them. God is not the author of confusion, and certainly not the author of all this confusion of translations in the English language.

Truth is, almost all the modern translations used lexicon based on the work of Gerard Kittel, who was Hitler’s “Christian” spiritual adviser. That’s why the 20th century translators, educated in Word-challenged divinity schools, put “slave” instead of The proper “servant”.

Forked tongue snakes come to us and question God’s Word, asking “Hath God said”, sowing doubt and confusion.

Be Here and but reject the seeds of doubt. Ask God for the wisdom to discern, and seek out “whether these things be so”.

Advertisement

Response to a critic of the “Google memo”

Responses to choice quotes criticizing independent thinker Da More of the “Google memo”…

“Women are as competent as men in math and science…”

I read Mr. DaMore’s complete memo to Google, and in absolutely no place did he ever say, insinuate, or in any other way imply that women cannot produce code or computing work as good as any man, whatsoever. The attempt to put words in his mouth do not help the case for any rebuttal to the memo, rather, provide an example of some of the thought policing made explicit.

“…suggesting there is no native difference between the sexes..”

That there is one of the most ridiculous anti-scientific and obviously wrong statements one can make. Countless studies have shown differences in behavior, inclinations, preferences, innate in the binary sex from birth. These tendencies reflect traditional ideas of the differences. Individual women in history have even led men into battles, including one Deborah in the Bible, and Joan of Arc inspired by divine vision, but this sex role reversal is historically anomalous. IT roles are more amenable to women than hunting with arrows, but there are differences.

Countless double-blind scientific studies have confirmed this obvious fact. An old joke (one that might violate 21st Century International Fascist Thought Police guidelines admittedly) illustrates this: A boy and a girl decided to inspect each other. The boy says, “Ha. I’ve got one of these”. The girl says, “That’s okay. My Mommy told me with one of these, I can have as many of those as I want”. (Cue Gamergate 2.0).

The whole “No Child Left Behind” is a joke, just like all other government “educational” initiatives of the 20th into the 21st centuries, culminating in disciplines nowadays that place political purity in textbooks, workplace and especially political power, over all other reality. This economic poison is what brought the Soviet Union down. It was not Reagan’s “Tear Down This Wall” speech, it was the preference in power and industry of lockstep subservience to the “Correct Ideas” (as Mao Tse Tung called them).

What’s next? Mao on Self-Criticism? Mao: “We have the Marxist-Leninist weapon of criticism and self-criticism.”

Beware lest you sow the wind and reap the whirlwind, with Maoist Cultural Revolution 2.0, and its mass murder that make Hitler’s numbers look puny in comparison:

http://www.heritage.org/asia/commentary/the-legacy-mao-zedong-mass-murder

And the irony. The international socialists killed dozens of times more in political Correct Thinking murders than any national socialist could have hoped for. But then Lenin and Stalin also supervised more than 20 million mostly white skinned Europeans. Maybe the same people want a repeat? Is this where the Greenies get the idea of culling the crowd?

I can easily believe that females are beating out males today in academic performance. So just let each one be an individual to choose their own future. I’ve heard that more females are going into law today. If the incoming female freshman doesn’t know that there is no barrier, and that they could even be preferred applicants especially in companies that have a Chief Diversity Officer, or a Chief Compliance Officer, then please put this into your freshmen orientation pamphlets.

It’s been decades that women have not had formal barriers to such disciplines. They are featured all over industry publications all the time and in general publications. Who has not heard of Admiral Grace, Lady Lovelace, and the rest? Add one of my daughters to your list of Masters of Science in Statistics, now practicing. The other daughters could have but decided to go into “softer” sciences and now populating middle-level productive business positions.

I wouldn’t mind that. But mandates are counterproductive to the purported goals. Trying to add incentives and effort to get a desired “balance” in color and gender divert resources and attention from the kind of production that helps the bottom line in private companies, and exacerbates tension among performers, and makes every decision a potential political hot potato.

There is a reason that apparently most Googlers were opposed to the author’s firing.

Paul Ryan Declares His Sin in Lies

“He that answered a matter before he heareth it, it shall be counted for a shame and folly unto him.”

Paul Ryan joined the mob chant on Charlottesville, probably knowing already  it was a setup or likely setup. They complain because he blamed the people who were most guilty, along with the others.

The Swamp is swamping Trump, despite some good measures he has taken. There is no stopping the sinking of U. S. S. Swamp Stinker and it’s subjects with it.

“The wicked shall be turned into hell, and all the nation’s that forget God.”

Government PR Department (aka Media)

Since when has the crony government media Cabal been honest? NYT: Major booster for “Uncle Joe” Stalin
All of them:
WMDs in Iraq.
Battleship Maine
Memphis syphilis experiments.
ISIS and Senator McCain’s rebel buddies in Syria.
Cover up of persecution against Christians in Syria from rebels. McCain’s friends in Syria staging false flag chemical attacks. Drumbeat of Russia as the enemy With Trump, NO EVIDENCE after a year. Coverup and dishonesty about Billary’s serial sexual abuse in the past. Poll number lies

…and the list is interminable…

Was Old Media ever honest?

Since when has the crony government media Cabal been honest?

Well, okay, maybe before my lifetime….

NYT: “Uncle Joe” Stalin
All of them: WMDs in Iraq.
Battleship Maine
Memphis syphilis experiments.
ISIS and Senator McCain’s rebel buddies in Syria.
Cover up of persecution against Christians in Syria from rebels.
McCain’s friends in Syria staging false flag chemical attacks.
Drumbeat of Russia as the enemy With Trump, NO EVIDENCE after a year.
Dishonesty about Billary’s serial sexual abuse in the past vs. Trump’s language.

Poll numbers lies.

Rocklin Kindergarten Transgender Discussions

http://sacramento.cbslocal.com/2017/08/22/rocklin-parents-grill-school-board-over-transgender-discussions-in-kindergarten/

Parents protested at the Rocklin Academy Shool Board. One mother: “My little girl came home crying, terrified that she might turn into a boy”.

One teacher said it’s a “dangerous road to go down” toward book burning.

That shows the absolute Orwellian insanity of today’s America.

And to think in 1993 when they were busy declaring “gays” a “protected class”, they rolled their eyes and said “Ridiculous”, when we warned the gullible that the Crazy Class would follow up with “gay marriage”.

Little did we know…

Majority of Googlers Against Firing of James Damore

http://www.breitbart.com/tech/2017/08/10/report-half-google-employees-firing-james-damore/

Viral term: Oppressor Media, Oppressor Cabal

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/08/20/source-mcmaster-fails-to-brief-trump-before-thats-too-bad-error/

I’ve been looking for a good term with “stickiness” to put on the general class of persons in Big Government, Big Academia, Big Pharma, Big Banking, Central Banks,

McMaster and Kelly.. Two snakes in the grass..

POTUS should read Vox Day’s excellent book “SJW’s Always Lie”. Every truth-teller should tell is who has not yet drunk of the insanity of the day. Vox Day goes over what SJWs methods, and then makes suggestions about how to deal with them. Trump follows some of them, I think by accident, because he’s got a big ego.

That’s what they used against Bannon. First an author no doubt approached him with a flattering title or idea, Time splashes Bannon front page as the brains behind the throne, anonymous “leaks” exaggerate his war inside as if nobody paid attention to Trump, the Swamp Insider Snakes leak lies and truths, magnified all over.

Then the Swamp Snakes get McAuliffe and Charlottesville mayor to set up the “Unite the Right” rally for beatings at the hand of the leftist Brownshirts.

Then Swamp Media unites with RINO liars in Congress who all blame only one side in the ruckus, the wrong side.

Comsomol did no wrong?

America is dying. Christians let the pagans push them out, and retired back to 501-c-3 muzzled church buildings. God proclaims Jeremiah’s warning to Israel as a prophecy to the U. S. of America, judgment is coming. Christian prophets have proclaimed this warning ever since the Supreme Court declared God an illegal alien and Christians second-class with rulings against religious speech content, throwing all things God out of officially permitted government school and state activity.

More on Open Borders and Libertarian Positions

HALF of “illegal immigrants” in California are receiving some form of welfare, according to their own official stats.

PLUS consider the real world in which Obama declared Open Borders for all the “minor-age children” who show up at the border, and contracted with some big corporate firms, including some associated with the Koch Brothers (who are very good on many things), to house, clothe, and feed those “children” (many of whom were much older), and placing them across the country.

And then he imported a bunch of “refugees” from Europe and elsewhere, at GOVERNMENT expense and scattered groups of them to many cities and small towns across the country.

So, BZZZT, with Western governments such welfare states, one and all, migration to them from places who are still much poorer (Deep State is trying to spread the poverty here as fast as they can) is also a situation where many who come to work might not do so if not for seeking that welfare “security cushion”.

Case in point, in early and mid 20th century, Puerto Ricans poured into New York until it almost had more Puerto Ricans than Puerto Rico did. Air fares were even cheaper to New York from San Juan than to Miami in the 1970s and 1980s.

The Libertarian Angle: Q&A on Open Borders

Hornberger answer questions they got about libertarians on borders. Here is my reaction after hearing just the first question.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhSVglYz3-c

So-called “Open Borders” is NOT NOT NOT “the” libertarian position!! And not all libertarians say it is. At least not without qualifications.

ONE. it is absolutely most important to point out that in a “pure libertarian society”, where there is a near-universal respect for the non-aggression principle (aka NAP), almost all areas at borders and near borders would be <<<PRIVATE property, not government property, and that would include all maintained roads.

And tresspassing without permission, or without obvious implicit permission, would be verboten. Like as in, Thou Shalt Not Pass. One of the biggest problems on the southern borders of the United States is that of illegal entrants crossing multiple ranchers’ land, like in southern Arizona.

It’s a dry area, so many ranchers find dead hikers on their land frequently. The tresspassers leave garbage behind from small camps, and human waste, things that the ranchers must clean up and manage. THAT, my friends Jacob Hornberger and Richard Ebeling, is THEFT, not just “open borders”.

You explicitly agree with this principle. But for your restrict your answer to public roads. By which you mean GOVERNMENT roads. Government roads are illegitimate. They are based on illegal takings (“eminent domain”) from landowners, but this is enforced at the threat of the guns of “law enforcement”. Those roads and border crossing points are build with funds STOLEN from the prospective future neighbors, and manned with same.

The best way to know what the taxpayers want done with that STOLEN money with respect to borders is whatever the closest legitimate desires would be of the people they STOLE the funds from. There is no clear method for finding that out. The closest way to know is to find the desires of the “electorate”.

And that approximation of the middle class of America, ravaged and savaged by the regimes that are the biggest thieves in history, the federal government (and most states), they made clear their views by voting for the first guy who credibly promised to actually “control the borders”.

I am for absolutely free movement in societies that respect the principle of liberty and property.