Archive for the ‘Freedom’ Category

Fake news: the Elephant in the Room

April 11, 2017

When commenting on the “new” phenomenon of “fake news” with presumably a multiplier effect with the Internet, there is an elephant in the room getting ignored by most of the traditionally respected actors in the sphere of news and commentary. They have formed a kind of “mutual admiration society” with a circularly reinforcing view of events that excludes outlying and dissenting views.

The ones who are most troubled about fake news and looking for ways to limit its effect are the ones often most guilty, in other words.

Tabloids have peppered newsstands in stores and supermarkets for decades, including testimonials of women who gave birth to two-headed aliens.

This “new” theme of “fake news” was tossed out first in the 2016 presidential campaign, pushed by both Obama himself and the Clinton campaign.

In a typical use of the term, the Washington Post was so aghast at the fake news scare that it published a list of fake news sites, throwing in serious right-leaning sites questioning official ruling party views, like Breitbart.com, in with actual blatant and overtly “fake news” sites like “The Onion”.

And of all the accused “fake news” sites getting fingered by “authoritative” sources in this discussion, is a simple news link aggregator, www.drudgereport.com,  that does not even pretend to offer its own content, and does not even have original commentary, and includes links that are even helping drive people to traditional newspaper sites like the Washington Post itself!

That list was made by an apparently “fake front” for some group that demanded anonymity from The W. P. to protect itself from blow-back purportedly, and then quickly disappeared into the cyber ether.

But let us look at a mere handful of items from the history of “fake news”.

The sinking of the Battleship Maine was immediately blamed on Spain by the Respectable Establishment Press in the United States. To this day the cause of the explosion that sunk it, deep in the bowels of the ship, is a mystery.

The sinking of the Lusitania was used as a pretext to involve the U. S. in World War One, the “Great War”. We now know, a fact hidden then, that the Lusitania was loaded with all kinds of bellicose material. Instead of reminding both Woodrow Wilson and the public of his guarantee that he would not involve the country in that war, it cheered the battle and helped cover up the military nature of that ship’s cargo, using civilian passengers as “human shields”.

More recently, the chemical attack in Syria in 2013 proved to be a “false flag” attack by the rebels supported by the USA in funding and equipment, as reported in several European newspapers and by respected award-winning journalist Seymour Hirsch: https://www.lrb.co.uk/v36/n08/seymour-m-hersh/the-red-line-and-the-rat-line
Those rebels were actively developing these weapons. The version of the recent 2017 attack that a standard Syrian bomb hit a rebel depot storing such weapons is a much more credible version.

And yet, most, though not all, the Elephant in the Room swallowed up the story without questioning why the winning side of the war, now not having to worry about Trump’s administration removing him (“Regime change is off the table”), would want to risk it all by using chemicals.

There is much ado about nothing. The winners of any crackdown on “fake news” are in a Truth is Lies ministry, as in Orwellian worlds. “War is the health of the state”, the saying goes, justifying attacks on civil liberties.

There is another good example of the “wild west” Internet doing more good than bad. ACM Communications recently published an article about the posting of what purported to be a solution to the “P versus not P” problem. It was refuted quickly, in about one day. One day! That used to take submission to peer review, with months required for review then publishing, and do it again for a refutation if it got past the months of peer review.

The Internet is Peer Review on Steroids.

In computing and science, there is not much to fear there either, except from the self-appointed “opinion leaders”. America still has a great many people thinking for themselves.

Twitter: Free Speech for anti-Trump gov users but shadow-bans Dilbert

April 10, 2017

Vice reports Twitter’s win against a request from DOJ to unmask the users behind a Twitter account that is appropriate used by a group of anti-Trump government employees, @ALT_uscis.

https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/alt-twitter-account-trump-customs-lawsuit

The report has a gleeful tone to it that some big guns lawyers lined up to oppose the “administrative warrant” against the government.

The problem here is not that the government surveillance state was pushed back, but the raging hypocrisy of Twitter executives in their justification for this “principled” stand.

Twitter’s “scathing letter of objection includes this gem:

“Attempts to unmask anonymous online speakers in the absence of a prima facie defamation claim are improper and would chill the First Amendment rights of speakers who use Twitter’s platform to express their thoughts and ideas instantly and publicly, without barriers.”

Now, that is a gem, in isolation as such. Free speech and all.

But Twitter’s actions against users who want to use Twitter as a “platform to express their thoughts and ideas instantly and publicly, without barriers.”, speak louder than these words.

Banning the expressions of effective speech by other users exposing selected crimes by Deep State operatives, including revelations of the Obama team’s illegal unmasking and surveillance of Trump campaign, and the rest of us.

And then there’s the shadow banning of dissident voices of opposition to shadow government and other instances of Deep-State crimes and ridicule against its propaganda.

So it just depends on which part of Deep State Twitter decides to support. In other words, Twitter has picked one of the two sides in the internecine tug of war inside the State.

I mean shadow-banning Dilbert, Twitter? Really? Champion of free speech?state

Nothing hidden, said Jesus,  that will not be known abroad…

 

Was it the Russians that did THIS?

January 11, 2017

Somebody must have told him, say this OR ELSE.

Who in their right mind would believe that professional state Russian cyber-hackers would make sure to leave evidence they were there? Use a script you downloaded from a hackers’ dark net web page, run it, then Done and Gone. Oh, but make sure you leave behind your signature? 

At least the Georgia elections board caught them in the act, because the Georgia Secretary of State they traced a connection back to an IP address in a range that belonged to the Department of Homeland Security in Washington, D. C. Now that is language that “techies” understand as real evidence. There is NOTHING like this anybody is talking about in the CIA report. Obama wanted a conclusion just like George W. Bush did, but the CIA I notice did not put any real proof in there that anybody could verify or verify wrong.

Did the Russians make the Clinton campaign comments that Catholics should change their religion?

Did the Russians tell Podesta’s guru witch to invite the Clinton campaign executive to a coven ceremony with disgusting bodily fluids and kids for entertainment?

Did the Russians produce “Clinton Cash”, a movie exposing the rot and corruption of the Clinton Crime Family?

Did the Russians force the Clinton gang to say Latinos are “desperate” and clingy?

Did the Russians set up an unprotected private server in the Clinton bathroom and make her send unsecured emails with State Department secrets?

Did the Russians write the talking points when Clinton called half the country names like deplorables, racists, misogynists, homophobes and worse?

Did the Russians make sure Clinton supported the HATED Obama policies?

Did the Russians hack into Clinton’s mouth and make her say she would keep Obamacare?

Did the Russians hack into Clinton’s brain and make her say she would add a trillion-dollar freebie program to make community college free for everybody, making even more indoctrinated college kids?

Did the Russians pay the Clinton campaign to pay homeless and poor to start fistfights and provoke violence at Trump rallies?

Did the Russians hire the thugs that shut down the Trump rally in Chicago in the operation personally approved by candidate Clinton?

Was it the Russians that made Clinton throw lamps at staffers after debates?

Was it the Russians that made people sick and tired and outraged at being slandered at every turn by the Administration?

Did the Russians stop the Jezebel from augmenting security in Benghazi?

Did the Russians make Hillary send arms to al Qaeda to overthrow Gaddafi in Libya and obliterate the entire town of Towargah with its 10,000 blacks, a GENOCIDE, and turn it into the hellhole and ISIS turf it is today?

Did the Russians invite Hillary Clinton to send arms and support to ISIS in Russia, through Saudi and other Arab intermediates, then call for dogfights over no-fly zones in Syria?

Was it the Russians who refused to coordinate anti-terrorist strategy in Syria with the United States, or was it the Obama-Clinton administrations?

Was it the Russians who campaigned for another Cold War instead of finding a way to have peace?

Was it the Russians who wanted to get rid of Assad, the best protector of Christians in the Arab world?

Was it the Russians who staged a false flag attack by the Obama-Clinton supported “moderate” rebels in Syria against civilians and tried to blame it on Assad?

Was it the Russians who made Clinton send McCain to a photo opp with “moderate” Syrian rebels, one of which was exposed as ISIS later?

Was it the Russians that were outed as serial rapist and sex abuser married to candidate Clinton by a long parade of the husband’s victims?

WAS IT THE RUSSIANS WHO HAVE TURNED AMERICA’S BIG CORPORATE PRESS AND OUR OWN GOVERNMENT INTO SUCH OBVIOUS LIARS THAT WE CANNOT BELIEVE THEM ANYMORE?

https://www.trutherator.wordpress.com

Reuters spins fake news on Supreme Court nominee Garland

December 23, 2016

Lawrence Hurley writes this article on Reuters about the refusal of the Supreme Court of a lawsuit that sought to force the Senate to vote on the confirmation of Merrick Garland to SCOTUS.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-garland-idUSKBN14824O?il=0

In Hurleys’ first nod to fake news spin, he calls Garland a “a moderate appeals court judge“. When a Mockingbird Media organ says somebody is “moderate” or a position is “moderate”, they are speaking a foreign language, they are not speaking English as in standard English. “Moderate” is a subjective word, besides, and so it says nothing about whether a court appointee is truly moderate.

Moderate, according to the most relevant Merriam-Webster definition:

“professing or characterized by political or social beliefs that are not extreme”

Garland’s past decisions show how Mockingbird Media and the Mockingbird Education Complex has abused the language to try to promote Orwellian Newspeak.

Senator Pat Toomey-PA points out that in cases involving the EPA that came before his court, Garland ruled in favor of the usual EPA unconstitutional over-reach in 90 percent of those cases. In the few times he ruled against the EPA, he said it was not enough abuse [my word] of regulatory powers.

In one such case, the court ruled that a rational cost-benefit comparison was “irrelevant”. So if, for example, saving the cross-eyed black-and-white purple polka-dot people eater would bankrupt the national treasury, this is irrelevant? Garland’s opinion was over-ruled at the Supreme Court, where Scalia joined the majority.

But Reuters says this is a “moderate”.

At the time of Ruth Bader Ginzburg’s nomination by Bill Clinton, she was at the time “regarded as a moderate”. If you dig down into why she was so regarded, it was because that was the usual Mockingbird Press talking point, not because of any objective “moderation” measuring stick.

After all, this was an ACLU attorney. Come on, “moderate”?

Her reason for saying she thought Roe v Wade was a mistake? Because it galvanized pro-life opposition to prenatal infanticide (the euphemism is “abortion”).

Now Merrick Garland has ruled against the Second Amendment in a case named by the NRA, where his opinion was that the right to bear arms was not an individual right.

No matter how much Mockingbird Press and Media mocks us by tireless repetition otherwise, the right to bear arms is an individual right and to say otherwise, that is an extremist position.

To say that any one of the rights listed in the Bill of Rights is a collectivist right and not an individual right, is an extremist position. To say that any group, as such, has a “right” based on their differences from other groups, that is an extremist collectivist deviation from the way most Americans have thought since independence.

Reuters also says that the refusal by the Senate has “little precedent in U.S. history”. This is not just spin, it is a lie.
For example,the Senate Democrats did a six-month “filibuster” against the nomination of Miguel Estrada to federal court. Estrada withdrew his name from consideration 28 months after he was nominated. The Democrats objected for ideological reasons while claiming other excuses.

“Little precedent”, Reuters? There is the matter of both Senator Hillary Clinton and Senator Barack Obama trying to block a vote on the nomination of Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court.

Well, at least they avoided the more obvious lie of “unprecedented” that some lying political mouths used.

All you power players trying to get in on a piece of Satan’s award of political power documented in Matthew 4 of the Bible, remember that “God is not mocked”, and “whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap”.

But in Isaiah 1:18 God also promised that if you “reason together” with him, “though your sins be as scarlet they will be white as snow”.  And Jesus promised that “he that cometh to me”, he will in “no wise cast out”.

 

Give peace and free markets a chance

December 11, 2016

CIA, FYI, these are politicized agencies now. CIA is known for disinformation operations, lies with a political agenda. CIA is also known for coups to overthrow elected governments.

We also know that George Soros and his merry band of hired agents, including in the State Department, overthrew the elected government of Ukraine, and meddled in post-Soviet Georgia.

We know also there was a lot of direct coordination between the Clinton campaign and Mockingbird Media. Whistle-blowers have told us that the CIA has agents in all the Establishment news rooms and publishing houses, whence the “Mockingbird Media” description. A journalist in Germany has openly confessed in shame that he published stories paid for by the CIA.

We know the Intelligence reports of WMD’s
in Iraq that Bush 43 used to justify invading Iraq were lies.

We know that the CIA grilled Jesse Ventura on how he got himself elected governor.

Now with this new tale about Russia hacking the American election to get a nationalist elected, we’re supposed to believe this?

What in the world is wrong with making peace instead of war??

Mockingbird Media promoted architects of Libyan racist genocide

November 24, 2016

Big Liars Media accused Trump of getting support from people who say “What about us?” which of course includes the groups who defend whites from discrimination.

Ron Paul handled it quite well. They “accused” him of having support from racist groups and asked him if he would disavow them.

His quick answer was “There’s nothing I can do about that”, a true answer that also was not insulting to supporters of any stripe.

The racism accusations against Ron Paul blew back up into their faces when he mentioned his plan to pardon all non-violent drug offenders on his FIRST DAY as president, and the mixed-race couple that could not find a doctor for the wife’s pregnancy until Ron Paul enthusiastically treated them.

Anyway, people should not get their hopes up too much. Trump should remember who elected him IN SPITE of the slurs and lies from those cretins.

Remember also, that these Big Corporate Media agit-prop organizations are organs of DEEP STATE, and they ALL have embedded CIA operatives (see Operation Mockingbird), and they are now officially another branch of government.

Trump is not the government, and ever since JFK’s assassination, some who studied that killing think it amounted to a coup d’etat executed by the CIA and they would not give it up. The attempted assassination of Ronald Reagan by a Hinckley –a family with close ties to the Bush family, with George H. W. Bush being former CIA head– slowed down the Reagan attack on the federal bureaucracy.

The CIA’s cheerleaders had motive to kill JFK certainly, but so did many others who probably pull the strings inside the CIA behind the curtain, the same ones who arranged for the central banks to take over national currencies and central banks everywhere in the world. These are members of the same Oligarch shadow government Oliver North talked about once, the “secret societies” much mentioned outside Mockingbird Media.

So spread the word. You can’t trust MOCKINGBIRD MEDIA. Forget calling it “Mainstream”, it’s not “mainstream” anymore. After Brexit, after the way markets reacted to the Trump victory, after the rise of resistance in Europe to the Globalist Oligarchs, they are not so mainstream anymore.

Even in Latin America, signaled by the wildly popular Uribe’s election THREE times, and jump-started into international attention in Latin America especially by the defiance of Honduras against the entire world in 2009 in its defense of its own sovereignty against the Chavista subversion, surely engineered by Worldwide Public Enemy Number One George Soros (keynote speaker in November 2008 at a Caribbean-Central American conference in the Dominican Republic.

Latin America followed Honduras’ example. El Salvador’s leftist president forthwith nixed plans to join the Chavez oil club, a former president of Guatemala suggested uniting foreign policy with Honduras, the most honest elections and most scrutinized in the hemisphere that year brought recognition to Lobos’ government quickly, the mayor of Caracas pined for the kind of male organs Honduras had shown. Paraguay impeached its runaway renegade leftist president. A multitude marched in protest in Brazil, organized by an unknown libertarian. Later, Brazil has removed its Chavez-supported leftist president from office and her replacement in constitutional succession is a free-market believer. Buenos Aires has elected Macri its mayor in an upset for the Kirchner presidential couple.

Remember the scandal when Chavista Venezuelan operatives were busted smuggling in suitcases full of cash meant to help elect the Kirchner’s?

The Globalist Cabal has trillions of dollars of wealth at stake, and power over the masses. In keeping with the deepest of World Government Deep State agents, they are not going to go quietly into the night. These are people who are responsible for not just targeted political assassinations, a long series of false flags that got a lot of people hurt and killed, but mass murders on giant scales.

One recent example of their sociopathy is the support by the Hillary Clinton State Department of al Qaeda in Honduras and their overthrow of Gaddafi and their massacre that obliterated the entire town of black-skinned Libyans in Towargah. That was a true racist genocide that nobody of the Obama-Clinton administration has answered for and there should be some very loud outrage.

Instead, we have Mockingbird Media hyperventilating over the color of some clowns who can’t get more than a few dozen idiots together and who allegedly want to return to whiteness? Really? Can they get any more outrageous than that?

WHERE IS THE OUTRAGE OVER THE RACIST OBAMA-CLINTON INSTALLED REGIMES IN LIBYA? Where is the religious freedom advocacy so protective of Muslims in the United States when it comes to the bands of murderers in Syria that take pleasure in beheading Christians?

And where is Mockingbird Media’s over the Obama-Clinton support for these murderous gangs?

“Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.” Galatians 6:7

“Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool.” – Isaiah 1:18

What is alt-right?

November 23, 2016

“alt-right”! Gullible leftist believers in gov-media high priests of Oligarchy don’t even know what that means.
Their remote control operators do, though.
The mind-control department sees that “right wing extremist” lost its sting, and they’re flailing about, so now they have another curse word to throw at people who dissent from the government propaganda.

Won’t work.

Biggest FAKE NEWS MEDIA ORGAN = NEW YORK TIMES, CNN, ABC NBC CBS MSNBC UNIVISION POLITICO etc.

 

AP still promoting climate hoax

November 12, 2016

AP article says that calling the “Climate Change” hoax a hoax is a “false view”.

http://elections.ap.org/content/trump-transition-packed-washington-insiders-lobbyists

They used to call it “Global Warming” with the fraudulent hockey stick graph and other false props, until Climategate and then it became rather obvious to anyone who checked that their own measurements, publicly and freely available, showed that temperatures had stopped going up. 20 years and counting.

The article mentions the resignation of Alberto Gonzalez in 2007 as being associated with a “scandal involving the firing of U. S. attorneys. I wonder if they ever mention that Bill Clinton fired every U. S. Attorney General in the whole department when he took office. Maybe that helped push back on the FBI investigations into the Clinton criminal cartel.

It’s a rather interesting lift of people on Trump’s transition team though. The AP article calls them “Insiders”, but the descriptions therein seem to indicate persons with views that have been shunned from the more powerful “Insiders”.

One troubling indication, though, is the possible offer of Treasury Secretary to the JP Morgan Chase CEO. That is just as bad as a Goldman-Sachs executive pick.

Somebody who had a bio that would indicate she knew some way up there Insider and Secret Society things that I had already known, told me once that nobody could make it that far, to be president without being one of the Secret Society insiders.

If so, that would indicate in these transition team picks that there are factions in “Deep State” that absolutely did not want to risk World War Three, Soros be damned. Maybe.

“By their fruits ye shall know them”, said Jesus Christ. “Ye shall know them by their fruits”.

Hillary pushes war in Libya, Syria, Iran but cares about “minorities”? (Remember Towergah)

July 9, 2016

Project Veritas is spot on with the point that citizen video and citizen-driven Internet is changing the world. But freedom-minded citizens have got to get ahead of the narrative.

Society-disruptors are trying to set the world into chaos so they can “save us” and step in with their one-world government.

NOTE the contrast between the massive abuse of the federales against all of us, versus an occasional killing of a black man by a white cop. National armies of the allies of our ruling globalist socialist statists are abusing ranchers in the West, peaceful pot-smokers everywhere, arming Mexican cartels, forcing people from incompatible cultures together, arming and financing the slaughter of innocent Muslims and Christians around the world, and protecting baby organ markets.

Libertarians and whistle blowers are pointing to these atrocities, and the tyrants building their global police state are losing the narrative. So how about the coincidence of the shootings (all of them, Minneapolis, Louisiana, and Dallas, etc.) robbing the headlines?

Oh yes, and right after Comey says “Guilty As Not Charged”? Coincidental coincidences pile up!

The solution is to spread the gospel of peace.

No better peace than the one that comes from the Prince of Peace.

 

P.S. (Very interesting how searching for just Towergah gets no hits at all on Yahoo, and is pushed down several pages on Google. This is not personalization, this is censorship)

FBI exposed

March 29, 2016

So now the FBI discovered, supposedly, that it could get the data from the suspect iPhone without the help of Apple.

It is only pure coincidence, right, that they did this just a couple days after Snowden publicly ridiculed the idea that they needed Apple in the first place!?

First thing I thought of was that it was theater, a show, because the NSA has been caught collecting exactly that kind of information from all phone calls everywhere in the first place.

Ha. Rushbo did his own little rush to the mike to say that it proved the NSA does not do such collection and does not have the information. Why would he make such an idiotic statement? It’s not because he’s an idiot.

So this little piece of theater that had the FBI and Apple doing a little tango for all to see is an attempt to give the government cover to pretend it doesn’t monitor everything. It’s cover for Apple so they can show they protect their users’ encryption. None of the Old Guard Media is asking how many of those special warrants have been served on Apple.

You know, those warrants where the FBI agent writing the warrant executes it, along with the warning that it’s a criminal offense to tell anybody about it. He doesn’t need a judge after the Patriot Act era now, remember….