Carolyn Moos: Jason Collins’ Collateral Damage | MRCTV

http://www.mrctv.org/videos/carolyn-moos-jason-collins-collateral-damage

Like the New Jersey governor that nobody remembers now, who saved himself from prosecution for abusing his office by announcing, “I’m so-and-so and I’m gay”. Instead hero status.

Jason Collins saved his future from obscurity with the same declaration.

Yawn. It doesn’t surprise us anymore, but the reason the media beats the drums when it happens, is to surround the youth of the next generation with a world of homophiles.

The end game is against the natural family:

The bourgeois claptrap about the family and education, about the hallowed correlation of parents and child, becomes all the more disgusting, the more, by the action of Modern Industry, all the family ties among the proletarians are torn asunder, and their children transformed into simple articles of commerce and instruments of labor.

But you Communists would introduce community of women, screams the bourgeoisie in chorus.
The bourgeois sees his wife a mere instrument of production. He hears that the instruments of production are to be exploited in common, and, naturally, can come to no other conclusion that the lot of being common to all will likewise fall to the women.

Blah blah plus lies. One of the reason he wanted to destroy all religion, besides hating God, is that the expose this lie about marriage. Note the recognition by the Number One family-hater of intellectual history that children are the central idea of the nuclear family.

Now another big lie, accusing his enemies of something that he himself, and Communists and socialists and the fashion-setters of so-called feminism, all are guilty of:

He has not even a suspicion that the real point aimed at is to do away with the status of women as mere instruments of production.

Women are exactly “mere instruments of production” in socialist societies that do everything they can to get women to work as “mere instruments of production”. Why? Because the alternative is women raising the next generation as mothers and passing on their culture. This is something they hate:

But, you say, we destroy the most hallowed of relations, when we replace home education by social.

But what? State indoctrination, government indoctrination, is more “hallowed” than the family? Who cares more for the well being of the children? You and me, as the parents, or some powerful bureaucrat somewhere that thinks it should take the children from the parents?

Related articles

• Jason Collins’ Ex-Fiancee Carolyn Moos Writing Tell-All Book (blacksportsonline.com)
• Jason Collins’ Ex-Fiancee Carolyn Moos Says She Didn’t Know He Was Gay (Photos) (blacksportsonline.com)

 

Marriage is for a family, a family is for the children

education online (Photo credit: Sean MacEntee)

This is a reply to the blog by Brian Roberts, a sociologist:

http://brianrobertssociology.wordpress.com/2013/04/02/nuclear-family-in-decline-bbc-online/

First this: “Functionalism and the New Right see this as detrimental to society, evidenced in the increase in crime, educational failure etc.” Then “This argument rests upon the assumption that a child needs to be raised within an environment of married mum and dad – dad being the key stabilizer here.”

If something is “evidenced in”, then it’s not an argument that “rests upon the assumption”. As a matter of fact, the “evidence” you mention shows the actual truth of the matter, something that actually some voices agree from among the more censored and suppressed voices ion today’s “sociology”.

In fact, the “evidence” is stronger than how it was presented. The studies –even from more “gay-friendly” survey organizations– show that the correspondence between a strong nuclear family of husband, wife, on one side, and less crime, more educational success, more psychological stability, and so on.

There are exceptions on all sides, depending on what measures you accept.

The damage is done when social and political pressures in the majority of social milieus impose the assumption that the family type doesn’t matter.

Besides, the historical evidence from millenia of recorded history shows us also that the tendency toward the true nuclear, natural family springs from nature. A woman is driven by her maternal instincts unless it is “socialized” out of her. Genders of man and woman are *most obviously* and self-evidentially natural, and not impositions of society, an idea some some “social disruptor forces” are trying to impose on the rest of us, mostly from positions of power.

A society with fewer stable children, after all, is more resistant to dictates from state decrees. Children raised by father and mother, less confused by gender confusions imposed unnaturally upon them, absorb more of their parents’ base values and are not so vulnerable to manipulation.

That’s why the powers that be demand state indoctrination centers for the children, and that’s why they assume that taxes extorted from the populace must be allocated there. That’s why from the beginning, free and forced education requirements were imposed early on. Instead of treating the education dole like they treat the welfare dole, they instead want to make it education by the state.

It’s not “for the children”, obviously. If it were “for the children”, they would look at the results of nearly a century of almost universal obligatory and government-provided schooling, and recoil in horror at it, and immediately insist on letting parents have those resources so they can have a choice as to where to put their children. Using the slower children as an excuse to put chains on the brighter ones to bind them to centrally planned failures is an outrageous atrocity, and not even based in fact, since the “slower ones” are often freed up in a different setting to thrive.

Related articles

• Day 366: Learned Helplessness and the Traditional Nuclear Family (journey-of-lindsay.blogspot.com)
• Family – The Basic Social Unit (cutisahouse.wordpress.com)
• Professor: Children Belong To The State, Not Parents (VIDEO) (thecollegefix.com)
• Explore the concept of ‘the family’ and reasons for family change using theories of modernity and postmodernity (graememclartyblog.wordpress.com)

Some Encouraging Contrasts by Butler Shaffer

Gallery ~ The Adventures of Ozzie and Harriet (Photo credit: erjkprunczýk)

http://lewrockwell.com/shaffer/shaffer270.html

Hurray. Good article… Society misses the children..

In my opinion the forced march toward feminism covered the separation of women from the nuclear family. The nuclear family —husband and wife and children– is in my opinion, the best bulwark against state control and long-lasting tyranny.

It was a basic point in Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto platform, a platform I once rallied for in college days.

Now we get women “liberated” from pregnancy worries by both the pill and abortion. We get women shipped off in the military from their babies. We already got the divorce of children from marriage a long time ago with all the Hollywood romantic movies, family caricatures like “Married With Children“, and now ridicule of the very idea of an Ozzie and Harriet family.

The whole idea is to separate children from their parents and dissolve the natural, nuclear family, so the state can control the next generation, that is, the ruling class state, greedy for power.

Related articles

• The Natural Family and “77 Non-Religious Reasons” (trutherator.wordpress.com)
• Jacob Shaffer ‘Mini Trial’ Begins Today (whnt.com)
• The New Babbleon by Butler Shaffer (johnnyangeladvocacygroup.net)
• More background on the persecution of Fr. Greg Shaffer by campus tolerance activists (gwhatchet.com)
• A Brief History of Political Correctness and Its Origins (atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com)

Homeschool parents have 1 shot to see son again

The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo (2011 film) (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

http://www.wnd.com/2013/04/homeschool-parents-have-1-shot-to-see-son-again/?cat_orig=education

This family needs international support to keep their son.

The Swedish authorities have been brutal against the rights of the family to keep their child, based only on their home-schooling decision, despite testimony from numerous friends and neighbors they are a good family and the decision of a lower court in the family’s favor.

The child was taken from them even as they boarded an aircraft to go to the mother’s home country of India. Their Social Services, the agency that was portrayed as criminally negligent in the novel by Stieg Larsson, in his so-called “Millennium Trilogy“, the most famous being “The Girl With the Dragon Tattoo“.

They are certainly living down to the horrendous performance of the treatment of the girl in those novels.

Of course Stieg Larsson was also wrong, wrong, WRONG, in his perverted portrayal of Nazil history. The Nazis, especially the Hitler kind, despised Christianity and hated the Bible. His fictitious evil socialist (“national socialist”) based crimes on verses.

Of course the crimes they committed were worse than the perversions portrayed, weren’t they, and he did not bring in the question of whether these people actually did it.

 

Related articles

• What You Need to Know about Homeschooling (education.com)
• Think Homeschooler’s are immune from the reach of Common Core? Think again! (stopcommoncorewa.wordpress.com)
• Homeschool Homeroom Open House at the Chesapeake Arts Center! (chesapeakeartscenternews.wordpress.com)
• A Project to Help Homeschooling Humanists (patheos.com)
• Special Situations in Homeschooling Your Child (education.com)
• Homeschooling: The Future of Liberty (athomesense.com)
• What is the hardest part about homeschooling? (runningwithflashcards.wordpress.com)
• Do Parents Have a Right to Homeschool? (education.com)
• Homeschooling (ekanovitasari123.wordpress.com)
• First Year Homeschooling 5: Helpful Rescources (amongmanyblessings.com)

Social workers snatched me from the white parents I loved to make me live with a black family: How the colour-obsessed foster care system sentenced Dawn to a life of regret | Mail Online

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2122464/Social-workers-snatched-white-parents-I-loved-make-live-black-family-How-colour-obsessed-foster-care-sentenced-Dawn-life-regret.html

It’s racism in any direction, but let us remember. What people call “race” today is totally skin color. It’s not even “skin deep“. It’s like the same house, no matter what color you paint it.

I’ll repeat it often: There is only one race. There is the human race.

Content of their character: “I have a dream that my four little children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character.” — Martin Luther King, Jr

All men are of one blood: And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation; – Acts 17:16

Related articles

• UK social workers snatch a child from France (parentsagainstinjustice.org)
• White Couple Told Black Foster Child Belongs With Black Family (theroot.com)
• Facebook for Victims of Social Services snatching Children for Adoption (victims-unite.net)
• What “race” do these black & white twins belong to? (trutherator.wordpress.com)
• The iron hand that rocks the cradle (thehindu.com)
• Modern-day Inquisition in Europe (burubaxair.wordpress.com)