I have added a page, where I parse out the issues that relate to the recent episode surrounding the ronpaul.com Internet claim:
https://trutherator.wordpress.com/why-ron-paul-owns-his-own-name-vs-the-internet/
Anybody who claims that Ron Paul did this in bad faith, loses ALL claim to any moral high ground, and that applies ESPECIALLY to the group that grabbed the name when it became available.
And if the latest I have heard about is true, that group will now face a backlash from the people who were supporting them against what they thought was a misguided effort by Ron Paul.
What I heard was that they asked for a counter-judgment against Ron Paul for reverse domain-name squatting.
I sincerely hope that this attack against the character of Ron Paul, using the very UN they complained about when Ron Paul made the claim, does blow back against them.
It certainly exposes them as “sore winners”. Not content with blocking Ron Paul’s claim, they want to get a judgment to paint him as a bad guy.
So now tell me again why they want to keep ownership of his name and a web site for Ron Paul fans?
Watch them tell us it was for Ron Paul principles. Not so much anymore.. Which ones will be remembered for Ron Paul principles in history? We know who has lived out their character in public for the world to see. But we also know who ran to blast Ron Paul for taking their domain name and lied when they said he was running to the UN to get the domain. (Of course they did not mention that if true, it was they themselves who used the United Nation rules to lay claim to the name)
And since they will LOSE the name if they do not continue to pay the ongoing rent for use of the domain name, by the way, it is NOT a “property” issue. The only “natural” property issue that lies outside government rules and UN-blessed arbitration agencies, is to find who the name itself most “naturally” belongs to originally.
Trutherator's Weblog 