Posts Tagged ‘Planned Parenthood’

“Reproductive rights” — Orwellian Newspeak — because it’s about the BABY

October 26, 2013
Dr. Bernard Nathanson, known as a "King o...

Dr. Bernard Nathanson, known as a “King of abortion”, would later be an active member of a pro-life organization. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

This goes out in reaction to Tibor Machan‘s opinions as expressed in the following link:

I think humans should respect the rights of girls inside the womb, not just the one with the body outside the womb.

How many more women to die? Never mind that Bernard Nathanson (“The Silent Scream“) video, who testified in Roe v Wade, has repented after watching ultrasound later on, and in answer to a question about the 10,000 women who died in “back-alley” abortions, he said they just “made it up” (his words) because it sounded like a really big number.

So who knows, really. But meantime there is a killing field of little girls (let’s remember the boys, too okay?)

CIA World Fact Book says China has a population from 0 to 14 years old of 124,773,577 male and 107,286,198 female. This means a ratio of 1.163:1 of boys to girls. The natural ratio is something like 1.05 to 1.00. God arranged it that way because males die at a higher rate of death during the earliest years, and normally it balances out. This pattern is seen in statistics I’ve looked at for the U.S.A., too…

That means for a population of that many young males, calculating from the ratio, a “normal” number of females would be 124,773,577. Subtracting the number of girls in their actual census, that means that 11,545,780 girls are missing. They are victims of abortion, a side effect of the one-child policy. And that’s not even counting the number you get if you calculate out the number corresponding to the boys that are also killed in the womb.

Those are real girls who are killed then too, in scalding, burning salt solutions, or their little limbs torn apart inside, or in partial-birth abortion their brains are sucked out from their head through a tube after the rest of the body is kicking outside the womb already.

The militant anti-Christian opinion-setters and propagandists want you to think this is just a Christian cause. Do a Web search on the words “pro life atheists” and there are a bunch of links to “godless prolifers” (as in The fact is, it is a human life.

An important libertarian principle is that individuals are morally and objectively responsible for the consequences of their own actions. Once you have been confronted with the obvious fact that the baby inside the womb is a human being, you have a responsibility to avoid murdering it. This is a fact of innate knowledge in “expectant” mothers, in fact, as so many women in the Silent No More movement have said. They are only “expectant” in the sense they are “expecting” the birth of the baby, in which the baby emerges from inside.

The BIG LIE is to try to talk about abortion (ending the life of the baby inside) as “reproductive rights”. This is Orwellian newspeak, and it is amazing to watch minds adapt this terminology –like Tibor Machan– who in other contexts see through them. After all, he is more intellectually honest than most libertarians in some of his writings that make clear that the fall of socialists –sometimes “with a vengeance”– is all the fault of the CIA.

We all know now that when you have sex, often a conception occurs of a new human being. We all know as well that there is no 100% sure contraception. Babies often happen in spite of these measures. If you engage in the sex, and a baby grows within, then the obligation to respect the non-aggression principle applies. This is not just a “duty” to save a life, something Walter Block has argued against quite effectively.

In fact, due to the dependency that a baby has, I’ve read libertarians argue that the woman has a duty to find an adoptive couple (or even person) if at all possible before killing it. I argue from the principle of consquences that becoming a parent involves positive duty.

This might be seen as requiring a positive right of the baby as individual. That may be, but this is one area were the individual responsibility for the consequences is a special case, since the parent bore that new life and that new human life requires some amount of care in order to merely survive to an age where he can make decisions for himself. The parent is responsible for the baby’s existence, the parent made it happen.

You broke it you bought it, says a sign in big letters easily visible as you enter the china shop. You’re on the shop owner’s property, you follow the rules. It’s a comparable idea. You conceived it (talking about the father too) you “own” it but anything you do that purposefully endangers that baby’s life is an aggression, and therefore is not acceptable.

So now let’s address the REAL issue in these discussions about abortion.

Abortion apologists all KNOW that the debate from the pro-life side is about the BABY. That’s why it’s always “reproductive rights”, as if killing the baby had anything to do with reproduction anyway. The Germans had no “reproductive right” to kill even one Jew for being a Jew, or a Gypsy, or the millions of Christians he did in.

But to women who have done this, there are lots of women who have found their way back to peace and now warn other women, younger women (This is relevant to the debate because women have a natural compulsion within themselves to protect their babies, and it is indoctrinated out of them by depopulation engineers. Or sometimes other factors drive them.)

Isaiah 1:18 Come now, and let us reason together, saith the Lord: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool.‎


Abortionists praying for more abortions: Echos of “Baby Ponds”

April 21, 2012

Found, surprise, at the Washington Post web site:

A prayer for abortion?

Pro-life advocates have long complained that Planned Parenthood, the country’s largest abortion provider, worships at the altar of abortion, but did you know that the abortion industry actually prays for abortion?

Perversely reminiscent of 40 day pro-life prayer vigils, Planned Parenthood in Humboldt County, Ca., is promoting it’s own “40 days of prayer,” March 18th through April 27th, for abortion. This is not their usually disguised promotion of abortion as “preventative care,” “family planning,” or “contraceptive services.” No, they throw those typical euphemisms out and directly pray for abortion.

It seems as though they feel confident enough now they can unveil the spiritual connection to pagan rituals of infant sacrifice, and to tell people of faith how to believe, bring them into lockstep conformity to how they are told to think by the self-appointed “Guardians of the Planet”, so they title it.

I’m not talking about the poor women who are exploited by these architects of depopulation, generally they know not what they do, and it’s very rare that the ones who’ve undergone such a thing, very rare they are proud of or brag about it.

At least even those who do it don’t talk about the ones they’ve done. Don’t let them tell you they’re afraid of fundamentalists, another lie, because if there were a Muslim fatwa issued on them they would certainly act differently, plus they know that in this country babies do not have realistic legal protection.

Baby ponds were the scourge in pagan China where “unwanted” babies were thrown to drown by mothers and others who didn’t want them. One report tells of a Christian missionary who attended an ecumenical conference in the first decade of the 20th century in Chicago, who literally begged the Christians to shun any statement of equivalence of religions.

Jesus Christ and his followers brought to the world  the idea of respect for the neighbor’s rights, because they considered it a duty to love others with the love that God had loved them and gave his only Son for them. They adopted the babies in Greece that were left on hillsides, they gathered under bridges to catch them as they were thrown down, and eventually mothers began leaving their babies at their doorsteps knowing they would have good lives.

Today, instead of promoting adoption for poor mothers’ babies, now they want to make it a “holy sacrament”, and it will be an “unholy sacrament”. By the way human sacrifice and child sacrifice is a blatant “sacrament” among Satanists, bluntly put.

Reminds me of an old lefist folk song I just heard earlier today, that the rich are eliminating poverty by killing the poor.

So they’re pulling off their masks and maybe they figure they have Christians sufficiently marginalized to be able to push the envelope even further.

But we will be okay, no matter what state we wind up in, because we have the very Creator of the Universe for us, and if God be for us, who can be against us? Abounding and abasing, David’s Mighty Men became the heroes of history.David was a protector of the poor:

And every one [that was] in distress, and every one that [was] in debt, and every one [that was] discontented, gathered themselves unto him; and he became a captain over them: and there were with him about four hundred men.

And remember, even though the Beast of the Mark will establish a world government, he will have his own world full of trouble himself, and the people that are preparing the world for him. There will be all kinds of anti-anti-christs, an apparently hostile army coming toward Jerusalem from the East, and he has a poor ending:

And he shall plant the tabernacles of his palace between the seas in the glorious holy mountain; yet he shall come to his end, and none shall help him. – Dan 11:45

Also remember that where sin doth abound, there grace doth much more abound, and God will abundantly pardon:

Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool.



Planned Barrenhood takes credit for two decades of free contraception for any woman that wants it

March 18, 2012

Margaret Sanger Deutsch: Margaret Sanger (* 1879)

A pdf from Guttmacher Institute, and that’s a Planned Barrenhood spinoff, bragging about how pushed and got “TItle X” legislation to bring free birth control to as many women as wanted it across the nation:

Former head of Planned Parenthood advocates one-child policy for the United States in this opinion piece:

He relays Planned Barrenhood’s motto: “Every child a wanted child”. I knew one woman who had tried all kinds of tricks on her own to “lose the baby” but he was very much “wanted” afterward, after he was born. Very much.

Besides, the put the lie to themselves because if they were sincere about it they would push for more births to satisfy the great long waiting lines for adoptions in the States, and they would advocate for drastically reducing the red tape that interferes with parents getting the children they want via adoption. But there are lots of poor that are disqualified also because they know that the state sends employees who throw around their weight like little tyrants (I have dealt with such enforcers).

Of course this waving of hands over population growth is so much blah blah hot air. There is no basis for these predictions of disaster, which have been disproved every single year since their first utterance from the snobbish mouth of George Malthus.

And note that they carefully avoid the E-word, eugenics. That was Margaret Sanger‘s main purpose, so she said, for which she also brought over Hitler‘s Eugenics chief to give talks at their meetings. They have her picture in admiringly prominent places on the walls of all the Planned Barrenhood Clinics across the nation, and maybe the world. They should put captions under her portrait: Ethnic Cleansing Champion.

Not for nothing their clinics are in higher concentrations in darker-skinned neighborhoods. Bosnian Serbs excused themselves saying they were only doing what Planned Parenthood had been doing for decades. Madeline Albright wanted to do the same no doubt in the other direction, her recent ancestor was a Croat. Croatia was the first province to quit Yugoslavia.

The rest is common knowledge. Actuaries have to study hard and long and pass lots of exams before they are allowed the title, kind of like lawyers. Ask one, look it up.

How can a political appointee like the ones that wrote the abomination that Americans hate that nationalizes the medical industry under central planning?

Insurance, birth control, preventive care, and economic sense

March 17, 2012
"Please for the sake of your country, use...

Says: "For the sake of your country, use birth control" -in China

>> Birth control is a predictive, elective (in most cases) expense. It’s like getting car wash insurance.

It is generally elective for now in the USA. But the powers-that-be that are pushing the universal conformity-enforcing “New World Order“, have other plans.

Planned Parenthood “helped” set up the forced-abortion one-child policy in China. Already a couple of years agone, hospital directors in Peru joined together to protest that they were getting mandated quotas for how many women to sterilize in their hospitals.


Women are the strongest and loudest pro-life force

February 6, 2012

It’s a commonly heard myth, a lie of promoters of abortion (prenatal infanticide):

“If men got pregnant abortion would be a sacrament and birth control pills would be communion wafers.”

Pro-life memorial in Bytom, Poland. Translatio...

Image via Wikipedia

Yeah, that’s why millions of women are pro-life and Concerned Women of America is one of the biggest and loudest organizations on any issue.

Prenatal infanticide is MUCH more dangerous for the female of the human race than it is for men.

Abortion kills more girl babies than boy babies, by the tens of millions.

And it’s the GUYS that push the women into abortions because the GUYS don’t want the responsibility. But there are also a lot of men who are also victims, robbed of their desire to be a real father by the mother’s abortion, often at the hand of the overbearing Dad of the pregnant mother.

Here’s a web site of an association of tens, maybe hundreds of thousands of women, who have had abortions and are warning other women away from their errors.

Featured is a good example of why it is WOMEN leading the charge against prenatal infanticide.

When Julia Holcomb was 16 years old she became the legal ward of Steven Tyler, lead singer of the rock band Aerosmith and current American Idol judge. At age 17, when she was 5 months pregnant with Tyler’s first child, and engaged to marry him, she barely survived a fire that burned their apartment. While still in the hospital recovering from smoke inhalation she was coerced into a horrific saline abortion. She is the author of the memoir The Light of the World – the Steven Tyler and Julia Holcomb story, published on Life Site News and credits her faith in Jesus Christ as the life-line that helped her rebuild her life after her abortion trauma.

She writes, “I pray that all those who have had abortions or have participated in any way in an abortion procedure may find in my story, not judgment or condemnation, but a renewed hope in God’s steadfast love, forgiveness and peace. Marriage and the family are the building blocks of all virtuous societies. I pray that our nation may find it’s way back to God’s plan by respecting the life of unborn children and strengthening the sanctity of marriage.”

Today Julia is happily married to her husband of 30 years and together they have 7 children. Julia is also an accomplished artist, having studied painting at the University of Houston and the Toronto Academy of Realist Art. She specializes in iconography, portraiture and landscape.