Posts Tagged ‘media’

Social Injustice Warriors are One Percenters’ own false front

February 9, 2017

 

You have the left wing Republicans, Democrats, press, Media, entertainment industry, political classes, billionaire plutocrats, professors, professional science pimps sucking at government teat, think tanks, teachers unions, globalist socialism propaganda fronts, Bildebergs, U.N. bureaucrats and parasites, government agencies, military-industrial complex, Government-Media complex.

They all will forever scream Nazi, Hitler, fascist, racist, home phone, misogynist, xenophobe, until their manipulating plutocrat cabal masters have their globalist tyrrany conswolidated.

Same as in all the Communist revolution:

Roles have flipped. Russia now fights back against this push of socialist cultural Marxists and their hegemony, while the U. S. and its vassals fight to keep it. They have even created their own anti-fascist false front to fight the true resistance to this one percenter cabal.

Media lies and bullies middle Americans and calls Trump the bully?

February 6, 2017

Oh poor Mockingbird Press, it’s Trump that’s beating up on you? Really now?

What’s the matter? Found a rogue and maverick who refused to cow under your blows and your darts and gave as good as he got? Who refused to follow your Doublespeak rules?

Wow. And Americans refused to buckle under your thought crime commands? You’re irrelevant now.

Americans knew you were talking about them when you called Trump names. We know you Liars thought us deplorable.

You had a gentle soul in Ron Paul and together with your oligarchy masters and “Deep State” collaborators refused to give him his due, even in the 10,000 to 20,000 strong crowds he drew, even on college campuses like even in Berkeley.

You seem to prefer the violent and destructive anti-Trump rioters and haters like at Berkeley. But this will also backfire against you.

Maybe your masters and handlers and pay-masters think they can control this but therein lies the rub. Neither Deep State, nor Media, nor George Soros, nor the Clinton-Bush-Obama cabal, nor Kissinger, nor the Bildebergs, nor CFR, nor the Trilateral Commission, nor the Washington Post, not one of these is omniscient, not one is omnipotent.

Be not deceived. God is not mocked. Whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.

Was it the Russians that did THIS?

January 11, 2017

Somebody must have told him, say this OR ELSE.

Who in their right mind would believe that professional state Russian cyber-hackers would make sure to leave evidence they were there? Use a script you downloaded from a hackers’ dark net web page, run it, then Done and Gone. Oh, but make sure you leave behind your signature? 

At least the Georgia elections board caught them in the act, because the Georgia Secretary of State they traced a connection back to an IP address in a range that belonged to the Department of Homeland Security in Washington, D. C. Now that is language that “techies” understand as real evidence. There is NOTHING like this anybody is talking about in the CIA report. Obama wanted a conclusion just like George W. Bush did, but the CIA I notice did not put any real proof in there that anybody could verify or verify wrong.

Did the Russians make the Clinton campaign comments that Catholics should change their religion?

Did the Russians tell Podesta’s guru witch to invite the Clinton campaign executive to a coven ceremony with disgusting bodily fluids and kids for entertainment?

Did the Russians produce “Clinton Cash”, a movie exposing the rot and corruption of the Clinton Crime Family?

Did the Russians force the Clinton gang to say Latinos are “desperate” and clingy?

Did the Russians set up an unprotected private server in the Clinton bathroom and make her send unsecured emails with State Department secrets?

Did the Russians write the talking points when Clinton called half the country names like deplorables, racists, misogynists, homophobes and worse?

Did the Russians make sure Clinton supported the HATED Obama policies?

Did the Russians hack into Clinton’s mouth and make her say she would keep Obamacare?

Did the Russians hack into Clinton’s brain and make her say she would add a trillion-dollar freebie program to make community college free for everybody, making even more indoctrinated college kids?

Did the Russians pay the Clinton campaign to pay homeless and poor to start fistfights and provoke violence at Trump rallies?

Did the Russians hire the thugs that shut down the Trump rally in Chicago in the operation personally approved by candidate Clinton?

Was it the Russians that made Clinton throw lamps at staffers after debates?

Was it the Russians that made people sick and tired and outraged at being slandered at every turn by the Administration?

Did the Russians stop the Jezebel from augmenting security in Benghazi?

Did the Russians make Hillary send arms to al Qaeda to overthrow Gaddafi in Libya and obliterate the entire town of Towargah with its 10,000 blacks, a GENOCIDE, and turn it into the hellhole and ISIS turf it is today?

Did the Russians invite Hillary Clinton to send arms and support to ISIS in Russia, through Saudi and other Arab intermediates, then call for dogfights over no-fly zones in Syria?

Was it the Russians who refused to coordinate anti-terrorist strategy in Syria with the United States, or was it the Obama-Clinton administrations?

Was it the Russians who campaigned for another Cold War instead of finding a way to have peace?

Was it the Russians who wanted to get rid of Assad, the best protector of Christians in the Arab world?

Was it the Russians who staged a false flag attack by the Obama-Clinton supported “moderate” rebels in Syria against civilians and tried to blame it on Assad?

Was it the Russians who made Clinton send McCain to a photo opp with “moderate” Syrian rebels, one of which was exposed as ISIS later?

Was it the Russians that were outed as serial rapist and sex abuser married to candidate Clinton by a long parade of the husband’s victims?

WAS IT THE RUSSIANS WHO HAVE TURNED AMERICA’S BIG CORPORATE PRESS AND OUR OWN GOVERNMENT INTO SUCH OBVIOUS LIARS THAT WE CANNOT BELIEVE THEM ANYMORE?

https://www.trutherator.wordpress.com

Canaan, the Amalekites, and Hanan the Agagite

January 9, 2017

When God told the Israelites to conquer the land of Canaan, he told them to leave the women and children alive.

The only exception as I remember were the Amalekites, who attacked the Hebrews THREE times, and were defeated three times. But the women and children left alive did not learn the lesson or repent, and grew older, and attacked the Hebrews again. Finally, after Saul disobeyed and left the king Agag alive, later on we find out Saul apparently let the queen escape to start another anti-God Amalekite tribe, because we see the Haman the Agagite convincing the king of Persia to decree death to all Jews.

God is righteous and merciful, and Charles Schumer should learn that God is more powerful than any intelligence agency.

That’s the problem that all those wolves in sheep’s clothing are having. Too many sheep are following the true loving shepherd instead of the snarling predators of the political ruling class.

God is not mocked. The people are laughing at Mockingbird Media. The professional liars have lost their usefulness.

So now they’re entering into the overt tyrrany stages. The language police, the cry-bullies, the Mockingbird Media lost control of the conversation, and their covert murders and atrocities are exposed, along with their fake news and false flags (Battleship Maine, Gulf of Tonkin, Iraq W.M.D.s, Russians did it lie).

God is not mocked and he will square all the accounts.

Lindsey Graham: Nobody believes you proven liars anymore

January 9, 2017

The bipartisan warfare-welfare machine has been caught in so many lies against us that of course people don’t believe them anymore. “How could you dare not trust us, your benevolent leaders” no longer works on us any more than it did for Stalin.

So the bullies are now down to censorship and fake news, like this fake news lie about Russia, which is only cover for causing Trump unjustified trouble. They are trying to get their gullible “useful idiots” ready for when they hope they might be able to pull off a color revolution

Reuters spins fake news on Supreme Court nominee Garland

December 23, 2016

Lawrence Hurley writes this article on Reuters about the refusal of the Supreme Court of a lawsuit that sought to force the Senate to vote on the confirmation of Merrick Garland to SCOTUS.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-garland-idUSKBN14824O?il=0

In Hurleys’ first nod to fake news spin, he calls Garland a “a moderate appeals court judge“. When a Mockingbird Media organ says somebody is “moderate” or a position is “moderate”, they are speaking a foreign language, they are not speaking English as in standard English. “Moderate” is a subjective word, besides, and so it says nothing about whether a court appointee is truly moderate.

Moderate, according to the most relevant Merriam-Webster definition:

“professing or characterized by political or social beliefs that are not extreme”

Garland’s past decisions show how Mockingbird Media and the Mockingbird Education Complex has abused the language to try to promote Orwellian Newspeak.

Senator Pat Toomey-PA points out that in cases involving the EPA that came before his court, Garland ruled in favor of the usual EPA unconstitutional over-reach in 90 percent of those cases. In the few times he ruled against the EPA, he said it was not enough abuse [my word] of regulatory powers.

In one such case, the court ruled that a rational cost-benefit comparison was “irrelevant”. So if, for example, saving the cross-eyed black-and-white purple polka-dot people eater would bankrupt the national treasury, this is irrelevant? Garland’s opinion was over-ruled at the Supreme Court, where Scalia joined the majority.

But Reuters says this is a “moderate”.

At the time of Ruth Bader Ginzburg’s nomination by Bill Clinton, she was at the time “regarded as a moderate”. If you dig down into why she was so regarded, it was because that was the usual Mockingbird Press talking point, not because of any objective “moderation” measuring stick.

After all, this was an ACLU attorney. Come on, “moderate”?

Her reason for saying she thought Roe v Wade was a mistake? Because it galvanized pro-life opposition to prenatal infanticide (the euphemism is “abortion”).

Now Merrick Garland has ruled against the Second Amendment in a case named by the NRA, where his opinion was that the right to bear arms was not an individual right.

No matter how much Mockingbird Press and Media mocks us by tireless repetition otherwise, the right to bear arms is an individual right and to say otherwise, that is an extremist position.

To say that any one of the rights listed in the Bill of Rights is a collectivist right and not an individual right, is an extremist position. To say that any group, as such, has a “right” based on their differences from other groups, that is an extremist collectivist deviation from the way most Americans have thought since independence.

Reuters also says that the refusal by the Senate has “little precedent in U.S. history”. This is not just spin, it is a lie.
For example,the Senate Democrats did a six-month “filibuster” against the nomination of Miguel Estrada to federal court. Estrada withdrew his name from consideration 28 months after he was nominated. The Democrats objected for ideological reasons while claiming other excuses.

“Little precedent”, Reuters? There is the matter of both Senator Hillary Clinton and Senator Barack Obama trying to block a vote on the nomination of Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court.

Well, at least they avoided the more obvious lie of “unprecedented” that some lying political mouths used.

All you power players trying to get in on a piece of Satan’s award of political power documented in Matthew 4 of the Bible, remember that “God is not mocked”, and “whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap”.

But in Isaiah 1:18 God also promised that if you “reason together” with him, “though your sins be as scarlet they will be white as snow”.  And Jesus promised that “he that cometh to me”, he will in “no wise cast out”.

 

Berlin attacker left his license at the scene? Really?

December 21, 2016

Strange things come out in the first hours after major incidents.

It turns out they’re saying the attacker in Berlin was under surveillance.

Arrested and released for forged documents earlier in the year, and they let him go.

He managed to avoid deportation, avoided jail for forged documents, was being watched by the authorities, and then arranges to kill all these people and escape the scene.

And they are telling us that this same guy who got through all that, managed to leave his driver’s license at the scene?

 

Let me “mansplain” something

December 21, 2016

Buzzwords: “Mansplaining”, for example, is meant to be an indignant condescending insult for any man who explains something to a woman. In other words, the woman who accusing a man of it is parroting the “social engineers” formula, a cutout from the Gramsci template.

It is meant to put men down for doing something women and men do with each other.

The psy-war of the intellectual strategists for the war on Christian values is meant to keep these group identities front-and-center as political divisions. In other words, convert every group difference into a political war based on the groups, rather than having to do with ideas.

Eichenwald libel, then revenge

December 21, 2016

Around December 16, journalist Kurt Eichenwald received a tweet that he says was specific and meant to cause any epileptic seizure. He has epilepsy. A truly malicious tweet. Twitter has agreed to release information that may identify the sender.

This is the journalist who admitted he made a “baseless claim” that President Elect Trump had spent time in a mental hospital. Meaning he wrote a libelous and actionable lie.

He apparently wants to squirm out of owning up to a crime (libel) by saying it was only a “signal to a source” to contact him.

So that anonymous guy may still get fingered, but what will happened to the Clinton campaign operatives caught on video bragging about inciting the riots and violence at the Chicago Trump rally? Is it because he said it was with full backing of the official campaign staff at the highest levels.

 

Finally, foreign influence in elections bothers Obama

December 17, 2016

CNN’S Brian Shelter says media should “be fair, but not be intimidated by Trump”. Kind of funny.

It’s doubtful that is a confession that they were not fair during the campaign season. Nor does it sound like his confession that they are being unfair to Trump now.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Obama hopes that “Trump will be similarly concerned that we don’t have foreign influence in our elections”.

Very funny. This is another tactic to try to keep the gullible nanny state defenders from getting disillusioned with them.

But  earlier, Obama did not mouth any concerns about the many foreign donations to the Clinton campaign. The hundreds of millions of dollars from the Saudis and Saudi government. The millions from the German government. More than a dozen other government.

Or speaking of the Russians, the sweet deal Hillary Clinton arranged for the Russians to own a great percentage of uranium in  the mines on American soil…

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^