Posts Tagged ‘Latin America’

Mockingbird Media promoted architects of Libyan racist genocide

November 24, 2016

Big Liars Media accused Trump of getting support from people who say “What about us?” which of course includes the groups who defend whites from discrimination.

Ron Paul handled it quite well. They “accused” him of having support from racist groups and asked him if he would disavow them.

His quick answer was “There’s nothing I can do about that”, a true answer that also was not insulting to supporters of any stripe.

The racism accusations against Ron Paul blew back up into their faces when he mentioned his plan to pardon all non-violent drug offenders on his FIRST DAY as president, and the mixed-race couple that could not find a doctor for the wife’s pregnancy until Ron Paul enthusiastically treated them.

Anyway, people should not get their hopes up too much. Trump should remember who elected him IN SPITE of the slurs and lies from those cretins.

Remember also, that these Big Corporate Media agit-prop organizations are organs of DEEP STATE, and they ALL have embedded CIA operatives (see Operation Mockingbird), and they are now officially another branch of government.

Trump is not the government, and ever since JFK’s assassination, some who studied that killing think it amounted to a coup d’etat executed by the CIA and they would not give it up. The attempted assassination of Ronald Reagan by a Hinckley –a family with close ties to the Bush family, with George H. W. Bush being former CIA head– slowed down the Reagan attack on the federal bureaucracy.

The CIA’s cheerleaders had motive to kill JFK certainly, but so did many others who probably pull the strings inside the CIA behind the curtain, the same ones who arranged for the central banks to take over national currencies and central banks everywhere in the world. These are members of the same Oligarch shadow government Oliver North talked about once, the “secret societies” much mentioned outside Mockingbird Media.

So spread the word. You can’t trust MOCKINGBIRD MEDIA. Forget calling it “Mainstream”, it’s not “mainstream” anymore. After Brexit, after the way markets reacted to the Trump victory, after the rise of resistance in Europe to the Globalist Oligarchs, they are not so mainstream anymore.

Even in Latin America, signaled by the wildly popular Uribe’s election THREE times, and jump-started into international attention in Latin America especially by the defiance of Honduras against the entire world in 2009 in its defense of its own sovereignty against the Chavista subversion, surely engineered by Worldwide Public Enemy Number One George Soros (keynote speaker in November 2008 at a Caribbean-Central American conference in the Dominican Republic.

Latin America followed Honduras’ example. El Salvador’s leftist president forthwith nixed plans to join the Chavez oil club, a former president of Guatemala suggested uniting foreign policy with Honduras, the most honest elections and most scrutinized in the hemisphere that year brought recognition to Lobos’ government quickly, the mayor of Caracas pined for the kind of male organs Honduras had shown. Paraguay impeached its runaway renegade leftist president. A multitude marched in protest in Brazil, organized by an unknown libertarian. Later, Brazil has removed its Chavez-supported leftist president from office and her replacement in constitutional succession is a free-market believer. Buenos Aires has elected Macri its mayor in an upset for the Kirchner presidential couple.

Remember the scandal when Chavista Venezuelan operatives were busted smuggling in suitcases full of cash meant to help elect the Kirchner’s?

The Globalist Cabal has trillions of dollars of wealth at stake, and power over the masses. In keeping with the deepest of World Government Deep State agents, they are not going to go quietly into the night. These are people who are responsible for not just targeted political assassinations, a long series of false flags that got a lot of people hurt and killed, but mass murders on giant scales.

One recent example of their sociopathy is the support by the Hillary Clinton State Department of al Qaeda in Honduras and their overthrow of Gaddafi and their massacre that obliterated the entire town of black-skinned Libyans in Towargah. That was a true racist genocide that nobody of the Obama-Clinton administration has answered for and there should be some very loud outrage.

Instead, we have Mockingbird Media hyperventilating over the color of some clowns who can’t get more than a few dozen idiots together and who allegedly want to return to whiteness? Really? Can they get any more outrageous than that?

WHERE IS THE OUTRAGE OVER THE RACIST OBAMA-CLINTON INSTALLED REGIMES IN LIBYA? Where is the religious freedom advocacy so protective of Muslims in the United States when it comes to the bands of murderers in Syria that take pleasure in beheading Christians?

And where is Mockingbird Media’s over the Obama-Clinton support for these murderous gangs?

“Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.” Galatians 6:7

“Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool.” – Isaiah 1:18

Daily Bell relates Monsanto, Uruguay, George Soros, GMO, Prohibition, “Legalization”

December 15, 2013
Palacio Legislativo, Montevideo

Palacio Legislativo, Montevideo (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The story is here:  http://www.thedailybell.com/news-analysis/34833/Monsanto-Marijuana-Initiative-Grows-in-Uruguay/

The Daily Bell writers regularly surprise me with perceptive insights, some of them of monumental importance in current events. They make connections that many of us fail to make, they often connect the dots for us.

Uruguay has become the first nation in modern times to “legalize” marijuana use. But the law requires users to register with the government, and restricts consumption per user to “up to 40g (1,4oz) of the drug a month”. It may be a step in the right direction, but that’s not much. When I was a college kid I toked (as we called it) on weekends, but quit later. My experience with it gave me a great way to tell my kids about it, how it makes you really, really dumb. Oh yes it does!

But despite the wasteful uselessness of the recreational use of the drug for a chemical high, banning it altogether is still worse, and the best scenario as in all things concerning such issues, is to ban the use of force to prevent its use for any reason whatsoever. Introducing a machinery of third parties making a maze of rules about it, means also creating an armed group with the purpose of making people obey those rules under threat.

Better to convince users with facts, rather than using the threat of force.

“A man convinced against his will is of the same opinion still”.

Anyway, read the Daily Bell article. It’s worth the read.

 

Stop blaming the CIA for every Latin American nation that stops socialist dictators!

October 23, 2013

Sheesh! Like the below whowhatwhy posting. Most of it is true in my opinion, but it seems liberty-minded writers in the US are good at discerning factors on domestic policy but are just starting to keep up with the changes in foreign lands:

http://whowhatwhy.com/2013/10/21/monday-morning-skeptic-ny-times-buries-cia-facts-re-latin-american-deaths/

I agree with most of the article at the link, but there is a VERY important new development in Latin America especially with respect to US meddling and undercover operations around the world. That is, nobody noticed, but now, instead of supporting so-called misnomered “right-wing” coups, and never-ending re-“election” of anti-Communists, their intelligence apparatus has begun, together with the diplomatic corps, to prop up leftist caudillos like Hugo Chavez and his fellow fascists.

In Honduras, they supported the left-wing coup by Manuel Zelaya, who became dictator while the world was ignoring the country. Even though the Congress was elected by the same electorate as himself. It started much worse when he came back from the Caribbean-Central American presidential summit in Santo Domingo in November 2008 where George Soros was keynote speaker! Kid you not.

Not only did Zelaya refuse to obey anything legislated by Congress, he also disobeyed a long series of Supreme Court orders, and lots more. That’s a coup. That’s what they called it in Peru –an auto-coup– when President Fujimoro dissolved the Congress, after it was paralyzed by the terror from the Sendero Luminoso, so-called.

The American Ambassador was in the presidential mansion the night before Zelaya planned his phony “survey” that he was going to use to justify dissolving Congress. He was helping plan this auto-coup consolidation, why else was he there, and he lent his name and office in support to this another leftist coup by phony “election”.

This is one case that I know about. Accusations that the CIA supported ousting Zelaya are a laugh riot. Hondurans wanted to get rid of him so bad, they were marching in the streets regularly, protesting him and especially his plans to consolidate his dictatorship.

Nobody needed to convince the Hondurans over this at any level. And through it all, the military forces stayed strictly obedient to the civil authorities.

Meantime, CHAVEZ was the meddling imperialist in Honduras. He’s gone now, and his successor is trying to be another one. You can blame the CIA for a lot of things around the world, but not that one.

And also adding to the international intrigue, Jose Insulza, head guy at the OAS, used their resources to order support for Zelaya’s illegal and unconstitutional “survey”, a cover for fraud and the propaganda to justify his dictatorship.

Insulza pounded at Honduras to put the coup-running president back in. And remember, as a young political adviser to Openly Marxist Salvador Allende’s regime in Chile he played a part in wreaking havoc on that attempt to install a leftist dictatorship in the continent.

And in Chile, never mind that the Cubans were meddling and intervening, pouring agents in, and helping coordinate the importation of leftists from the entire continent, no doubt with logistical and other support from the tyrants in the Soviet Union. Government embeds in the Communist government also were stockpiling large warehouses full of weapons, preparing for confrontation, no doubt. They started calling for troops to mutiny.

But Congress and their people saw the economy in the pits. Nationalizing the copper mines only provided payout opportunities for political cronies. Accidents skyrocketed over Anaconda’s record, the mines began losing money instead of paying taxes, and the nationalization was like shooting yourself in the foot to spite your leg!

So the CIA may have been involved, but the military did not intervene until their Congress passed a resolution finally, demanding that the military brass do something to stop the runaway Communist dictator!

The USA is the biggest bully and interventionist in the world, for sure. But let us remember that socialism and fascism tends to  shoot itself in the foot by its nature, and that there is a significant and numerous part of the people in Latin America who want NOTHING to do with socialism.

A libertarian answers Reason Magazine’s “conservative” case for gay marriage

October 8, 2013

A. Barton Hinkle has written an article found at Reason Magazine contributing reasons he believes conservatives have for supporting same-sex marriage, other than the old boiler-plate equality argument:
http://reason.com/archives/2013/10/07/a-conservative-case-for-gay-marriage

Being of libertarian persuasion myself, I think the government should not only get out of the business of telling people who to marry or not to marry, but get out of the business of “licensing” anybody at all to marry. There should be no benefit to marrying or not marrying, at all. Or any government-with-guns favored behavior at all.

But some of these things deserve answering in the context outside of that, because too many libertarians mistakenly think that supporting such a thing in general is a libertarian cause. I say that because their arguments show it.

(1) Gay marriage is good for “the institution of marriage.

Just because you’re under the illusion that “gay marriage” means more marriages does not make it so. I say illusion not because it necessarily means the opposite but because this assertion is a facile kind of argument, along the lines of the superficial supposition that anything government does for a group is good for them. That’s not an analogy to the argument, it’s just to say that this “reason”, at least the reasoning, does not take into account the unintended consequences, which is something libertarians are supposed to specialize in.

In fact the author recognizes some of this anyway when he admits that marriage between cats and mice would not strengthen the institution of marriage.

And one more thing, simply saying that “gay marriage” gets gay people to buy into a “(conservative)” value set (parentheses his), presupposes that a “conservative” value set including marriage with commitment would include the idea of same-sex marriage, something that a great many conservatives of course sharply disagree with.

In fact, gay marriage is another big blow to the institution of marriage and of the natural family. Not to mention intellectual honesty and common sense. The first one was easy divorce, which I view as a symptom rather than cause. Gay marriage is the second. Some groups advocating “gay marriage” already –quietly of course– include polygamy in their list of demands. After that will be group marriages.

But what this movement is really about is not about equality. It is driven more by powers and shadowy groups that seek to end the institution of marriage altogether, and absolutely fits what I used to support as a college-age Communist, full-blown. It’s part of the platform of the Communist Party, as listed by Karl Marx himself in the Communist Manifesto, right alongside central banks and dictatorships.

(2) Gay marriage fosters virtue.

Social conservatives believe sexual promiscuity is bad for the body and corrosive to the soul – that the sexual revolution’s encouragement of licentiousness has degraded social norms and debased our common virtue. If they are right about that, then allowing homosexuals to enter lifetime monogamy ought to be altogether desirable – just as it is desirable for heterosexuals, and for the same reasons.

Muy bonito, as they would say in Latin America. “Allowing homosexuals to enter lifetime monogamy” is desirable. Listen, A. Barton, not one person is America is preventing any “gay couple” in America or anywhere else from “entering lifetime monogamy”. Any gay couple can do that without pretending to be wed in what you called “holy” matrimony.

In fact, it would do the opposite in a number of ways.

One Christian speaker tells about a time when during Q&A, a “gay couple” arose to tell him they were engaged in a monogamous relationships. He asked this “gay man” for “how much” they were monogamous. Say, 100%, 90%, 60%? And the young man answered, “about 80%”. This young man did so apparently without even thinking.

The speaker of course highlighted the difference between “gay marriage” monogamy and heterosexual monogamy in the answer. He said his wife would never tolerate such a “monogamous “marriage”. In fact, almost all Hollywood movies recognize that one “infidelity” breaks the monogamy.

(3) Gay marriage benefits children.

Oh really?! Wow. Almost every social study on the subject has shown that by almost any objective criteria, in general, children raised in a home with both a father and a mother do better later on than those raised in any other family configuration.

In fact, the ACLU argument quoted here, mitigates against their own position, saying that denying same-sex “marriage” is to deny those children “the protection and stability of having parents who are married.” One of the most repeated points made by advocates is that heterosexual marriage is already broken, and they are right.

That’s because there’s so much selfishness, self-centeredness in the culture, and so many more people today than before who have grown up to think they have to claim all their “rights” and so cannot see another’s perspective. (Right here some are thinking I should consider another’s perspectives, but I have and it is irrelevant to the point. So read it again).

The point is, the reasons homosexual marriages are breaking down are part of the same phenomenon that drives the reasons argued for “gay marriage”.

The statement quoted there that “There is no evidence that gay parents are any less effective or loving than heterosexual ones” is actually and factually incorrect. Every relevant study shows a father and a mother in the home is best for the child. The words “less effective” cover a lot of ambiguity. “No evidence” probably means the speaker has avoided seeing it, and when pointed to it, just issues the mantra chant of “bigotry” as if using the word without addressing the issues raised would counter every argument.

(4) Banning gay marriage injects government where it doesn’t belong.

I agree with this, but it’s because marriage itself is something where the government does not belong.

As a matter of fact, demanding the government issue licenses for “gay marriage” is to recognize that government in fact must determine what is the optimal role for a family. Traditionally the entire culture, in fact almost all cultures for millenia, have considered gay coupling as something way outside of marriage, because marriage has always been seen as a natural institution that was best for raising children.

Even demanding “gay marriage” is in a way a demand for the “right” to simulate heterosexual marriage.

Now this really intellectually dishonest argument:

Conservatives content they want to protect the institution of marriage and foster procreation by straight couples. First question: Show me where the Constitution says that is any part of government’s job. Go ahead, I’ll wait.

Yeah, wait all you want, because this belies the obvious, and the use of phrasing “protect the institution of marriage and foster procreation by straight couples” is a misdirection that avoids another strong argument against the “constitutionality” of forcing “gay marriage” on the body politic.

First, I don’t know of even one conservative who points to the Constitution when they say that, so that’s disingenuous. To knock down the argument, you need to address it, not misdirect it like an illusionist.

Second, libertarians do not generally point to the Constitution for the basis for their arguments. Ron Paul has indeed used the constitutionality argument against many things, but he wraps it with the real reasons for his constitutional positions.

Third, SHOW ME ONE OF THE SIGNERS OF THE CONSTITUTION, EVEN ONE, WHO SAID ANYTHING THAT WOULD SUGGEST that they considered a marriage to be anything other than between a man and a woman, and the natural institution for raising children.

I dare anybody to show me evidence for any founding father of the nation or anyone who voted to ratify the Constitution, that might suggest they would think of marriage as anything else. In fact we all know that even marriages without children, after many years, would be considered a marriage that is missing something.

We all know this. We also know that this is why it is not explicit. It would have laughed out of the first draft, along with calls for repealing the laws of gravity, or motion, or biology.

Fourth, procreation has always been understood implicitly as part of the package in marriage. That’s why many states (most?) have required blood tests before issuing a marriage license, because incompatible blood types made a dangerous Russian roulette game for the babies.

So there is a great cost to society in same-sex marriage, and Dennis Prager has shown in detail how this works. They are a minority among “gays”, also, but there is a significant minority among currently practicing “gays” that strongly argue against “gay marriage”, I have heard them.

In fact, if government had not gotten involved in the first place with “licensing” and now we have pastors marrying people by the power vested in them by the state of so-and-so, then there would have been so such clamor, and the idea would have been seen in general with some humor.

God bless Mary O’Grady, God help history revisionist paid liar Stephen Lendman

May 28, 2013
Hondurans opposing Manuel Zelaya.

Hondurans opposing Manuel Zelaya. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

 

 

 

The CIA is not slouch and no angelic force for good but facts are facts. There is some really wrong stuff in that article about Guatemala! And if the “left-of-center” governments were so vulnerable to the CIA, then why is there no right-of-center governments left in Latin America?

Where do you get your paycheck for being a professional history revisionist, Stephen? I’m breaking my own rule and I am not even going to post a link to such revisionist history, a coverup for the really bad guys, probably the guerrillas themselves that did the massacre and then blamed it on the military.

The ruling against Efrain Rios Montt is a blatant abuse of power and corruption itself, a coverup for the real abusers, and is a message to all men in political positions to “obey, or else we will get you, now or later”.  And they want you to remember Pinochet: If we can’t get you, we’ll keep you locked up based on a lying judge in Spain (with an open public history of Communism) for awhile and then we’ll come after your children. It’s also a warning to their operatives, the ones that are fully cognizant of the crimes they commit against all the peoples, to stay away from Christians. That’s another reason he’s the one persecuted.

The bad guys have offered up a scapegoat to take the blame. But it won’t work. They will get their just desserts later, maybe from the same overlords that wanted to punish him.

The revisionist history that makes genocide disappear is not the ones that the revisionists that fancy themselves “leftists” make it out to be.

Fact check #1: Efrain Rios Montt did NOT  “seize power”. A coup d’etat did ask him to run the government, after overthrowing one of the most blatant electoral FRAUDS to that date in Guatemala’s history, after the then RIGHT!-of-center president that they overthrew arranged his own “re-election”, votes be damned, and the people roared in such loud protest demanding mlitary intervention against this shameless attack on “democracy”. They asked Efrain Rioss Montt to serve because he was universally respected in Guatemala as honest and impeccable.

But they overthrew him 16 months later because he remained true to his reputation, and because he tried to STOP dirty tactics against the guerrillas. Three percent my ass!

That’s why it took till NOW to do this, because (1) the real bad guys needed a scapegoat, and they don’t like Bible-believing Christians, and (2) a lot of voices of truth resisting the lies had to die off first, and (3) to get a younger indoctrinated generation critical mass that was not so close to events.

Like Manuel Zelaya planned on doing in his own unreported auto-coup, too, in 2009.

As to that slaughter of the Indians, he STOPPED it. It was local landowners getting colonels to take over lands, AND THE GUERRILLAS WERE MAKING SURE THERE WAS ENOUGH CONFUSION AND FALSE INTELLIGENCE TO MAKE SURE a lot of innocent Mayans would be killed.

That is what they’ve been doing in Honduras. The revisionist history in this article is the “leftist” version. The international socialists are as bad as the National Socialists for pushing lies and propaganda and distortions.

As we speak they are agitating a climate of serial murder against journalists and public figures in Honduras to take over by hook and crook after the Honduran people rejected their auto-coup by fraud in 2009.

Revisionist history indeed!

– See more at: http://www.thesleuthjournal.com/reinventing-guatemalan-history/#comment-959

 

Immigration, culture and freedom

November 11, 2012

There is a wrong take on the effect of immigration on the culture. The massive European immigration in the 19th and early 20th centuries resulted in some growth in Roman Catholic population –should have been strongly conservative like with Latin Americans later– but also massive numbers became evangelicals because born-again Christians boldly witnessed to their neighbors.

Even today, numbers of Protestants, especially Pentecostals, are multiplying growth rates in Latin American countries in a sort of “reverse cultural effect”.

So much so, along with the effect of true Mark 16:15 missionaries, that –for an example– we recently have a documented, video-recorded testimony with corroboration of dozens of witnesses that the earnest prayer of the faithful and a wife’s faith resulted in the resurrection from the dead of one Nigerian pastor.

View the youtube video here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KelctiNacpM

So the “problem” for “conservatives” and “libertarians” is not legal immigration at all, and not even illegal immigration.

It is the indifference and apathy of those who do not share their faith with others, and the failure to preach a Golden Rule social and political gospel with salvation.

By Golden Rule I don’t mean the false “charity” of those who vote to rob someone to “redistribute the wealth”. By that I mean teaching that whatever Caesar has belongs to God first, and when you vote to loot somebody else’s gain, you are voting for theft.

Christians can still witness to their neighbors, share the prophecies from the Bible that predict disaster for ungodly practices, but also the more recent specific ones that prophesy America’s collapse, and why.

 

 

The DEA, Honduras, and End Interventionism!

May 22, 2012

Some Hondurans are demanding that the DEA leave Honduras, but not all of them:
http://www.foxnews.com/world/2012/05/17/honduran-area-demands-dea-leave-after-shooting/

The article quotes all the wrong people in this article. Meaning, all the United Nations and other dictator-friendly groups that condemned Honduras for pushing back against a hostile foreign takeover by socialists and their willing local surrogate, the super-rich rancher and dictator Manuel Zelaya, who was ruling by decree, breaking all the laws passed by Congress that he didn’t like, telling the nation he didn’t have to obey any court orders, and was organizing one of the most massive and blatant frauds in the history of fake elections in Latin America.

Remember too, that Roberto Micheletti is still considered by the Honduran people to be a national hero. He is also an object of admiration all over Latin America as one who stood for freedom against the whole world and welcomed the vitriol as a badge of honor, and deservedly so.

But I have to make this next point very clear. I myself demand that the DEA get out of Honduras. I am absolutely against any official U.S. government intervention whatsoever in the internal affairs of any other country. In fact, I want the DEA and the CIA, and the KGB and the FSB, the FBI and the Cuban Intelligence Directorate, I want all foreign intervention to get out of Honduras RIGHT NOW!

In fact, United States drug policies are literally killing Latins south of the border, and north of the border, every day. The war against drugs has been a gross abject failure and the very best thing the U.S. could do for Honduras against the drug-fueled criminal organizations in Honduras and all Latin America –and for our own people, for that matter– is to throw away all the bans on drugs! It’s gotten so ridiculous that natural vitamins, and even herbs, are becoming targets of the pharmaceutical-government complex.

I want all foreign interventions OUT of Honduras TODAY! If there is any cooperation among nations, then let them help Honduras track down and bring to justice the killers who are murdering freedom-loving reporters in Honduras who speak up against leftist tricks and their public figures like Manuel Zelaya.

Who is financing the professional hits against reporters in Honduras? Like the two “professional” hits targeting Karol Cabrera that killed her daughter and a professional colleague. Why have those murders gone unsolved?

In the article above linked, one of the most ridiculous and ludicrous paragraphs were the last three:

George Withers, a senior fellow at the Washington Office on Latin America, which promotes human rights and democracy in the region, said his organization is concerned that DEA agents are frequently embedded with police and military throughout Central and South America for counter-drug operations. He said it’s disconcerting to have Latin American military forces engaged in police work.

“We have seen over the years that whenever the military interfaces with the populace, incidents of human rights abuses go way up,” he said. “We’re concerned that the U.S. is encouraging the use of the military for police work.”

In a written statement, the Committee of the Families of the Disappeared of Honduras, a human rights organization, said that “the so called Honduran authorities have the ethical and political duty to demand from the U.S. Department of State an explanation and a public apology, and to punish those responsible.”

The military forces in Honduras is the MOST RESPECTED government institution in Honduras for honesty and respect for civilians and most of all, for being the most free of corruption, except for the socialism-oriented groups, who probably get their funding from the same sources that ultimately finance the hits on the reporters who advocate freedom from leftist demagogues (and rightist demagogues, but they are the same thing).

I guess human rights abuses don’t include shakedowns by local police, hands-off attitude toward the crimes that ARE the biggest violations of the rights of peace-loving citizens. Maybe they don’t include the thefts by invaders organized by interventionist international socialist organizations that lead the willing and gullible into taking over cultivated land that does not belong to them, as they did in Bajo Aguan.

You think they care about the poor? Look how the poor fare in the land of one of their sponsors, in Venezuela, where infrastructure has been neglected and they lay on the floor in hospitals on bare sheets, and where in 2003 the government censored all crime statistics to hide the chaos inside.

Hondurans do not want to live in another Cuba or Venezuela, they have seen that future and they do not want it. Reporting like in that article are not helping the cause of freedom. Fox News, by recycling this kind of misinformation and disinformation, is just like the entire Big-Government Corporate Establishment Press based in the U.S.

English: The original image is of his siblings...

Roberto Micheletti  . (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

REQUIRE ID TO STOP VOTER SUPPRESSION!

April 10, 2012
Eric Holder at Obama-Biden National Security P...

Eric Holder, Press Conference, 12-1-2012 (Photo credit: Wikipedia) "FRAUD? WHAT FRAUD?"

How long can the gullible take getting embarrassed by the people in power that they defend?

Watch ‘Eric Holder’ vote in stunning election-fraud videoWatch ‘Eric Holder’ vote in stunning election-fraud video:
http://www.wnd.com/2012/04/ideological-hacks-at-justice-ignore-eric-holder/

You can bet Holder has seen this video by now and so he now has proof –we have it there– that eliminating ID requirements opens up voting to fraud. We all have also heard about the multiple places –this year and several times last year— when voter fraud and of course election fraud has occurred.

This is a back-handed way to steal elections. In Latin America it would be laughed out of town, because they already have too much fraud.

Stuff like this is turning America into the has-been laughingstock of the world.

Holder’s Injustice Department can call it a stunt (we still have freedom of speech in this country, at least for his guys, see) but it’s not quite like decriminalizing voter fraud with schemes to ban the evidence.

In St. Joseph County, Indiana, three Democratic Party officials have been arrested because they allegedly forged signatures so they could get the requisite signatures to get Obama, Hillary, and John Edwards on the ballots in the 2008 primaries.

The answer from the Central Command mouthpieces: No big deal, so what, it didn’t make a difference anyhow.

What great psych war expert picked that name, Voter Suppression anyway? Doublespeak dictionary editors couldn’t have done better even in Oceania.

So here’s a bumper sticker theme for you:

REQUIRE ID TO STOP VOTER SUPPRESSION!

Banks require ID’s for the smallest tiny withdrawal from the bank, but attacking the right to a republican form of government that the Constitution says the federal government should protect, hey, that does not? It’s worth trillions of dollars now, and quintillions when the dollar crash comes, and it will be worthless when they consolidate the dictatorship.

REQUIRE ID TO STOP VOTER SUPPRESSION!