Posts Tagged ‘Free market’

Mockingbird Media promoted architects of Libyan racist genocide

November 24, 2016

Big Liars Media accused Trump of getting support from people who say “What about us?” which of course includes the groups who defend whites from discrimination.

Ron Paul handled it quite well. They “accused” him of having support from racist groups and asked him if he would disavow them.

His quick answer was “There’s nothing I can do about that”, a true answer that also was not insulting to supporters of any stripe.

The racism accusations against Ron Paul blew back up into their faces when he mentioned his plan to pardon all non-violent drug offenders on his FIRST DAY as president, and the mixed-race couple that could not find a doctor for the wife’s pregnancy until Ron Paul enthusiastically treated them.

Anyway, people should not get their hopes up too much. Trump should remember who elected him IN SPITE of the slurs and lies from those cretins.

Remember also, that these Big Corporate Media agit-prop organizations are organs of DEEP STATE, and they ALL have embedded CIA operatives (see Operation Mockingbird), and they are now officially another branch of government.

Trump is not the government, and ever since JFK’s assassination, some who studied that killing think it amounted to a coup d’etat executed by the CIA and they would not give it up. The attempted assassination of Ronald Reagan by a Hinckley –a family with close ties to the Bush family, with George H. W. Bush being former CIA head– slowed down the Reagan attack on the federal bureaucracy.

The CIA’s cheerleaders had motive to kill JFK certainly, but so did many others who probably pull the strings inside the CIA behind the curtain, the same ones who arranged for the central banks to take over national currencies and central banks everywhere in the world. These are members of the same Oligarch shadow government Oliver North talked about once, the “secret societies” much mentioned outside Mockingbird Media.

So spread the word. You can’t trust MOCKINGBIRD MEDIA. Forget calling it “Mainstream”, it’s not “mainstream” anymore. After Brexit, after the way markets reacted to the Trump victory, after the rise of resistance in Europe to the Globalist Oligarchs, they are not so mainstream anymore.

Even in Latin America, signaled by the wildly popular Uribe’s election THREE times, and jump-started into international attention in Latin America especially by the defiance of Honduras against the entire world in 2009 in its defense of its own sovereignty against the Chavista subversion, surely engineered by Worldwide Public Enemy Number One George Soros (keynote speaker in November 2008 at a Caribbean-Central American conference in the Dominican Republic.

Latin America followed Honduras’ example. El Salvador’s leftist president forthwith nixed plans to join the Chavez oil club, a former president of Guatemala suggested uniting foreign policy with Honduras, the most honest elections and most scrutinized in the hemisphere that year brought recognition to Lobos’ government quickly, the mayor of Caracas pined for the kind of male organs Honduras had shown. Paraguay impeached its runaway renegade leftist president. A multitude marched in protest in Brazil, organized by an unknown libertarian. Later, Brazil has removed its Chavez-supported leftist president from office and her replacement in constitutional succession is a free-market believer. Buenos Aires has elected Macri its mayor in an upset for the Kirchner presidential couple.

Remember the scandal when Chavista Venezuelan operatives were busted smuggling in suitcases full of cash meant to help elect the Kirchner’s?

The Globalist Cabal has trillions of dollars of wealth at stake, and power over the masses. In keeping with the deepest of World Government Deep State agents, they are not going to go quietly into the night. These are people who are responsible for not just targeted political assassinations, a long series of false flags that got a lot of people hurt and killed, but mass murders on giant scales.

One recent example of their sociopathy is the support by the Hillary Clinton State Department of al Qaeda in Honduras and their overthrow of Gaddafi and their massacre that obliterated the entire town of black-skinned Libyans in Towargah. That was a true racist genocide that nobody of the Obama-Clinton administration has answered for and there should be some very loud outrage.

Instead, we have Mockingbird Media hyperventilating over the color of some clowns who can’t get more than a few dozen idiots together and who allegedly want to return to whiteness? Really? Can they get any more outrageous than that?

WHERE IS THE OUTRAGE OVER THE RACIST OBAMA-CLINTON INSTALLED REGIMES IN LIBYA? Where is the religious freedom advocacy so protective of Muslims in the United States when it comes to the bands of murderers in Syria that take pleasure in beheading Christians?

And where is Mockingbird Media’s over┬áthe Obama-Clinton support for these murderous gangs?

“Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.” Galatians 6:7

“Come now, and let us reason together, saith the LORD: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool.” – Isaiah 1:18

International corporate juggernauts

May 27, 2013
George Soros, billionaire

George Soros, billionaire (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

 

A “return back to international corporate juggernauts” does not deserve the revisionist history heaped upon it. People’s real incomes increased leaps and bounds from 1850 to 1900 in the USA, before a faction of “international corporate juggernauts” began to yell about those (other) “international corporate juggernauts” and “we have to stop them!” and they started passing laws to stop those (other) “international corporate juggernauts”.

 

Except, of course, they told us they were “one of us” and they were “helping” us stop those (other) “international corporate juggernauts”. Pay no attention to billionaire George Soros‘ billions, he’s “helping” us by financing “Obama“, please don’t look at the money, pay attention to the rhetoric please.

 

“Right wing” and “left wing” are from the Doublespeak dictionary from this particular subset of a faction of “international corporate juggernauts”.

 

The de-salination machine example is good for the illustration of the principle. The “real-world” counter-example of state-funded technology development is an illustration of stealing your money to give it to somebody, but the greatest advantages of recent centuries have been from private initiatives. The telegraph, the steam engine, the telephone, radio, telescope, movable print, vacuum tubes, microchips, cell phones, plastics, air conditioning, the PC, all these things were developed with private initiatives, not the state. The state wastes valuable resources that could be used for production, diverting them to political priorities, or the whims of the guy who likes using money confiscated from your pocket for his own whims. “Scientific” or not. Haha. Like studying whether monkeys get high on marijuana. Thank you, but no refunds.

 

The libertarian philosophy does not consider state funding as “free market” friendly because it is theft from somebody else. Lower taxes only means the state bosses are stealing less money from you.

 

Forcing you to hire somebody at more than minimum wage is neither “free market” nor “fair”. A free market of labor gives the teenager and the less-intelligent among us a chance to work for a living and contribute to production. The minimum wage tells him to go pound sand. Don’t worry, we’ll steal it from somebody else and we’ll pay you to sit on your fanny. Or we’ll steal it from somebody else who might have paid you more, so we can “subsidize” your pay.

Learn more at mises.org….

 

“Leftist” and “Rightist” Are Meaningless, What matters is Less Government Control vs. Less

September 17, 2012

During the 1930s and into the 1940s, the Nazis were often referred to as leftists. That’s right, leftists. What makes sense anyway?

What’s the difference between international socialism and national socialism? None, the only difference being whim of the dictators’ club.

Note that the free market advocates in the Soviet Union were called “liberals”, the same as in the 1930s and 1940s. Go read Ludwig von Mises. He “liberally” refers to “the liberals”. Guess who he’s talking about? Free marketers! This is what is meant by “classical liberal economics”, in fact.

“Left” and “right” mean nothing of consequence today in American political campaigns, especially reporting. Those words were hijacked for different meanings at journalism schools and political science departments of colleges that trained the government-media complex central planning writers of today’s propaganda media. The left/right language is used to Pavlov as many media consumers as possible into associating good things to bad things, confusing them.

The political spectrum that matters is command-and-control “government” on one end, versus total freedom on the other. More government control vs. less government control. Whether you want somebody telling everybody else what they can and cannot do, or whether you prefer the freedom to do whatever you like as long as you respect the rights of others. Respecting others’ rights means you cannot compel them to do anything, or not do anything, and they cannot compel you.

I call this “Golden Rule Government”.

Therefore all things whatsoever ye would that men should do to you, do ye even so to them: for this is the law and the prophets. – Matthew 7:12

Where do they find money for “studies” like this?

January 23, 2012
Scope of Government (liberal spectrum). For di...

Image via Wikipedia

Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics
Image via Wikipedia

I posted a few days ago on this liberal/conservative/brain study and after reading another blog post elsewhere on the subject of the study I had a couple of comments.

http://socialpathology.blogspot.com/2011/10/potpourri.html

Always these “scientific” studies trying to find how to “fix” people who the researchers don’t agree with.

Ludwig von Mises

Ludwig von Mises (via wikipedia)

This “liberal/conservative” so-called “spectrum” is itself detached from consistency anyway. In the 1960s, so-called “liberals” opposed all manner of police state actions like surveillance, property seizure without warrant, national ID and the like, whereas now in 2012 these are things the current “liberal” administration push and their “liberal” friends cheer.

Plus how did this word “liberal” get so messed up? In the days of von Mises, Austrian school economist, “liberal” meant free market and freedom from government intrusion. Now it’s a “liberal” who never gets enough.

The real spectrum should be between those who want complete freedom from government (libertarians) and those who want the government to save us from everything and control everything. Socialism and fascism are twins.

Mr. Friedman, Don’t You Ever Doubt Capitalism?

November 10, 2011

With all the inequity and greed in the world, don’t you ever have a little doubt about capitalism, Mr. Friedman? See the answer in this short clip on youtube:
http://www.lfb.org/product_info.php?products_id=103