JFK, the Cold War, Krushchev, Allende, and Zelaya

In general, as a convinced anarcho-capitalist, I agree with most of what Mr. Hornberger said in his video linked here about the JFK assassination:

http://www.voicesofliberty.com/video/the-facts-of-the-jfk-assassination-and-what-we-should-learn-from-them/?utm_source=Facebook&utm_campaign=VOL&utm_medium=post

Except mainly for one brief glancing comment about Salvador Allende. Not his fault, necessarily, though, considering the totality of the news blackout on certain aspects of the way things were then.

That said, once you learn some facts that are publicly available, and some that aren’t so much, there is no way one can say that Salvador Allende wanted a peaceful coexistence. There are other aspects of those events that say different, most of which were suppressed by the international press cartel for its own reasons, or for the reasons of those who run it. If the same sequence of events were to happen today, there would be a LOT of facts coming to light on all sides of the issues.

If I had doubt about that before, they were all blown away during 2009, when the entire force of the international news cartel Establishment threw its entire propaganda machine into supporting the same story line about events in Honduras, contrary to the truth. Every single official representative of every single member of the United Nations supported the s
ame story color-coordinated story line as the Media Cartel.

In Honduras there were even large demonstrations outside the offices of CNNE (CNN Espanol) demanding they remove their reporter and stop telling lies about events there.

That’s why I did some research about Allende. Most of what’s in the public libraries is tilted in one direction but even between the lines in the leftist shill press there is some truth to be had.

ALLENDE WAS NOT INTERESTED IN PEACEFUL COEXISTENCE.

One connection I discovered between the Honduras and the Chile stories was Jose Miguel Insulza, the Secretary General of the OAS. He was the chief political adviser to Salvador Allende in that regime, which had declared itself loudly as a Marxist government. Not just socialist, but Marxist. They saw the existing economic system of Chile something to overturn.

Allende brought not only Fidel Castro to visit, but he invited Castro-sympathizer revolutionaries from all the countries around Latin America. This was the 1970s when it was clear, without even believing government press, that Cuba was sending material support to violent leftist insurgencies across the country, and that was also with Soviet support.*

Okay, as socialism is ruinous on any economy, and catastrophic if administered as a shock treatment, Allende’s policies and its effects did just that. I can believe they had help from the CIA, but this process needed no CIA help. Socialism did the same thing that government interference has always done throughout thousands of human history, including the Soviet Union, only faster in the industrial age (which would have collapsed within months from 1917 without help from  Western banking capital).

As libertarians SHOULD know but always forget to point out, when the CIA brings down a socialist regime it is only accelerating a political process that occurs naturally, the same as to the USA regime. From what I understand, that’s just simple Austrian economics.

Anyway, Allende and his administrators (including Insulza) was already into his plan to build his own alternative military structure, just like Obama promised he was going to do in 2008. (Remember that?)

Allende’s regime was stockpiling weapons in government warehouses maintained by political appointees. He was importing experienced (violent) revolutionaries from all around outside his borders. Cubans were invited in (like they were to Venezuela even BEFORE Chavez).

THEN THE SAME CHILE CONGRESS that put the winner of the plurality into power of the general election (well below majority) , finally DEMANDED that the military take action to stop the runaway regime. So they did.

What follows was not pretty. But Chile is in a better condition now that it would have been had the military left Allende to execute the remainder of his totalitarian plans.

JFK somewhat before and toward the end sought peace. Apparently Krushchev did too, in my opinion, his removal being one piece of evidence.

But I doubt that of Allende. I also KNOW that Manuel Zelaya of Honduras in 2009 received the same (better even) coverage that Allende got in 1973. I also know that Roberto Michelletti got the same vitriol (worse really) spun at him that Pinochet got for so many years.

And in the usual leftist shill web sites supported by the usual socialist billionaire-foundation suspects, they still use the same lying rhetoric as back then.

(NOTE: Were there atrocities back then? No doubt. There were also full-blast shootouts between revolutionaries and military troops at those clandestine arms depots. The violent revolutionaries wanting to support the planned totalitarian regime change were called “resistance” against the coup, and the military “golpistas”.

Portugal had a peaceful coup. Libya had a peaceful coup and the West blasted away the ONLY middle-eastern nation and its leader that had denounced its own previous policies, and was a blue ribbon success for peaceful change among Arab countries. The ONLY one where Christians felt safe, women were lifted up in public view, prominently.

Honduras restored constitutionality, which you could call a “coup” but only if you count the stopping of a counter-coup that was already in progress, or restoration of constitutional continuity in power rather than presidential continuity in power.

I am an anarchist, but there things that are worse sometimes that the regime that rules in your land. Ask the Cold-war era refugees from Eastern Europe.

<<————————————>>

*–Remember it didn’t take long for the Soviets to remove Khrushchev after that rapprochement either. (And speaking of facts kept out of general public view, the current Rockefeller patriarch of the day had visited Moscow between both events.

It seems both sides of the Cold War (or their manipulators) wanted to keep the threat levels and military production up, but without actually letting any missiles fly.

Advertisement

Politifact lies: Pants on Fire!

 

Politifact arrogantly claims to hold the corner on truth. A lot of militants that criticize Christians with this same meaningless charge (they themselves are culpable, claiming to know better than Christians) run to their “findings” like this one as if it were the last word on it:

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2012/jan/08/rick-perry/rick-perry-says-barack-obama-socialist/

They fall back on the old definition of a socialist as one who believes in government ownership of the means of production and distribution in an economy.

This pretension falls under what we all know is another legitimate definition of socialism, found at thefreedictionary.com, from the American Heritage Dictionary:

2. The stage in Marxist-Leninist theory intermediate between capitalism and communism, in which collective ownership of the economy under the dictatorship of the proletariat has not yet been successfully achieved.

And then there is Fabian socialism, a term adopted to refer to the stepwise sneaky way of implementing it promoted by the Fabian Society, one which has been adopted today by many who scoff at the mere suggestion that they are “socialist” while doing all the steps that a socialist would do:

Fabian Society – an association of British socialists who advocate gradual reforms within the law leading to democratic socialism

And then there is Obama‘s claim to Teddy Roosevelt‘s proclamation of the foundation of socialist ideology, which is the idea that the government actually owns everything you have but lets you “keep title” to what it thinks you deserve to keep:

“The New Nationalism,” Roosevelt proclaimed, “rightly maintains that every man holds his property subject to the general right of the community to regulate its use to whatever degree the public welfare may require it.”

That’s right, Politifact, you are wrong! Busted! Pants on Fire!

And when you play with fire like you have done here, you get burned!

Socialism is better described as theft and plunder, a government taking whatever it wants.

YOUR NEIGHBOR’S PROPERTY IS NOT YOURS FOR THE TAKING!  THAT IS SOCIALISM AND IT IS WRONG, WRONG ,WRONG!

 

 

Related articles

• Paul Ryan trying to rig Politifact’s lie of the year (americablog.com)
• Political Fact-Checking Under Fire (npr.org)
• Liberals now say Politifact is Pants on Fire why? See Politifact lie of the Year (imns.wordpress.com)
• Obama invokes Teddy Roosevelt’s Speech: “Your property is not yours!” (trutherator.wordpress.com)
• Fox News’ Alysin Camerota: President Obama Told Truth About Politifact’s ‘Lie Of The Year’ (mediaite.com)

Administrator for Herman Cain forums endorses Ron Paul

Now that Herman Cain has dropped out of the race my new candidate is…..:
http://www.hermancainforums.com/index.php/topic,1824.0.html

Now that Herman Cain has dropped out of the race my new candidate is….. Congressman Ron Paul.

Ron Paul was the only candidate that actually had remorse for how the media treated Herman Cain and the alleged affairs, I will always thank him for showing respect in that nature, with that said.

I had always liked a lot of what Ron Paul advocates, I don’t agree with him on everything but probably 90%.

I am going to encourage all Ron Paul supporters to come here and openly support Ron Paul for he is now my new official candidate for President.

I was asked to support Newt Gingrich, there is no possibly way I could every endorse Newt Gingrich, how the republican party is supporting Gingrich I have no idea. While Newt has had documented multiple affairs with women Herman Cain’s campaign was destroyed by accusations yet Gingrich is at the top of the polls? What the hell is wrong with the republican party.

Newt Gingrich is for individual mandates

Supports the patriot act

Took millions from Fannie May and Freddie Mac all the while touting how strong and stable the companies were, then months later we gave them billions of taxpayer dollars while millions of people lost their homes.

Newts think tank also took over 35 million dollars from the healthcare industry lobbies that supported individual mandates.

Supported the bailouts

Supports global warming/climate change

Has had multiple affairs but yet is now top of the polls while Herman’s campaign was destroyed by accusations of alleged affairs.

The list goes on and on.

Yes my support will now go to Congressman Ron Paul from Texas.

Feel free to comment.

UPDATED; I welcome the Ron Paul supporters that have come here and I encourage them to stay and post info about Ron Paul so that the other members here can become educated. I will be posting info about Paul soon and the forum will be revamped with the Cain information removed and Ron Paul information added.

UPDATED : I have sent out over 22,000 emails to my endorsement, the overwhelming views on this post is outstanding, also thanks to all the Ron Paul supporters that have shown remorse for Herman it is appreciated.

The people can see that Ron Paul is the perfect gentleman in his discourse with interviewers. Instead of responding to the most vile and barbed questions with the scorn they deserve, he instead uses the occasion to embarrass the accuser with a teaching moment and to educate the listener. It’s interesting that they have not been able to edit enough to completely muzzle the image, without just using the obviously unfair tactic of simply not letting him talk, like CBS did.

When this happens you have to ask yourself, and a “moderator” can muzzle a participant that has been given his seat at the table BY THE VOTERS, and it is so consistent with Old Media that it is consistent with what is called an “unspoken agreement” among them, can government censorship be that far behind?

“They declare their sin, they hide it not”, like it says. It’s like they’re not even embarrassed at having a circus show and calling it a “debate”. Old Media, including Fox News, is telling you what to think and who to vote for, and it seems like Ron Paul is on track to become their new “Emmanuel Goldstein”, the guy they will be telling you to hate, with lies to distract you from the real problems of the Republic. Look at the difference in the treatment they gave for Bill Clinton, and contrast that with the stoning of Herman Cain.

The real problems are the Fed and the attacks on freedom at home here and abroad. That the constant wars of the establishment Republicans and Democrats are bankrupting us and have the opposite effect of what they’ve promised.

Yes, Old Media loves to dig up dirt on the candidates they hate, while pretending that the dirt that clings to the people they love is just sweat.

The American `allergy’ to global warming? – Oh yeah? My answer to the AP

Another article setting up another hit against dictatorship-resistance using a psy-war tactic: call them mental.

The American `allergy’ to global warming: Why? – Washington Times:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/sep/24/the-american-allergy-to-global-warming-why/

Maybe we’re allergic to bogus science. Maybe we are the skeptics that Michael Shermer claims to be.

If the author of this bogus analysis of why the denial were a true decades-long researcher into the global warming debate, he would know that the denials come NOT from oil companies but that it is CLIMATE SCIENTISTS leading the charge to yell that this Emperor Has No Clothes! Like the 100 career scientists that signed the protest letter to Obama.

So either he’s an INCOMPETENT reporter, or he’s just outright LYING. Which one is it, AP?

Not the first time AP published a falsehood. There’s one still floating around the Internet where they claimed that the biggest civil-society independent organization in Honduras supported the dictator and wannabe caudillo-for-life Zelaya, whereas in reality they, along with a certain 80 percent of Hondurans, backed his ouster and the restoration of their constitutional republic. Flawed as it is, corrupt as it is as Hondurans know it is, they knew that another Chavez would turn it again into a banana republic for the new club of tyrants.

I told them thru the first reporter’s email I could get and they blamed it on a translation glitch, but I notice their byline is still out there at their clients news sites with their attribution!

Related articles

• The American `allergy’ to global warming: Why? (barf) (gunnyg.wordpress.com)
• War of words over global warming as Nobel laureate resigns in protest (telegraph.co.uk)
• Larrie Goldstein: Global Warming Is Hot (junksciencesidebar.com)

Ron Paul knows the quote: “First they ignore you…”

Try as you might, Ron Paul is not going away, and whatever you do with him, his message has more stickiness than your desire to ignore it. both arms of the government-media complex, the leftist shills and the neo-cons, try as they might, can do nothing against the truth but for the truth.

His shining of the light on the attacks on freedom in our generation has exposed them.

Freedom brings people together, and whatever band of operatives of the Establishment they identified with, they are sick and tired of being told what to do, and how much of their own incomes they can keep, and sick of lying conniving politicians.

That’s why they’re flocking to the only candidate in this thing who’s been there for 30 years, predicted the mess we’re in, the only one who really understands how to get out of it and how to set America’s liberty and prosperity engine free again.

“Democrats”, “Republicans”, leftists, rightists, conservatives, liberals, flaming homosexuals and true Christian fundamentalists, in the heartland and on the coasts, farmers and lawyers, construction workers and construction CEOs, information techies and users, teenagers and college kids, octogenarians, people of all kinds make up the Ron Paul Tea Party Revolution.

“First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, and then you win”.

The plutocrats and autocrats will not easily let go of their power, but their psy-tricks are lost on a people who have seen it like it is. “Not easily” means they have not shown their complete bag of evil in America yet, but they will, and there will be a mess as the green paper pig inflated dollar balloon pops, but in the end, even the Beast of Revelation “will come to his end, and none shall help him”.

Chavez, Insulza, Ortega these are running coup governments with elections by fraud

http://edition.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/americas/06/09/honduras.coup.plot/index.html?hpt=T2

AP has consistently reported events in Honduras starting in 2009 and continuing today. For one thing, just like most of the controlled media around the world, reporting the constitutional removal of coup-plotting dictator Zelaya. It was the protection of a representative republic against an elected president who proved to be an enemy of fair elections.

The only coup plotters are the Resistencia, an alliance between (1) what Lenin called their “useful idiots”, and (2) the ones who just want to get in good with the new dictatorship.

The only coup that the socialist new world rulers will accept today is a socialist one, like Hugo Chavez’ coup or Daniel Ortega’s. Is AP reporting on Daniel Ortega’s coup in Nicaragua? Is the UN voting to condemn it?

Honduras remembers its national hero Micheletti…

Ron Paul’s Urgent Warning on the Inevitable Collapse of the Dollar

Global financial crisis fears after US rating downgrade | News.com.au
http://tinyurl.com/43rkwjc

A lesson from all this avoidable debt and dollar crisis is that establishing the Federal Reserve not only did nothing to resolve what they said was the purpose, that of banking credibility and bank runs from the 19th century, it only nationalized the problem, postponing it for a run on the federalized bank, especially when they let the dollar loose from a gold or silver standard.

Another lesson from the debt downgrade: The warnings that the ratings warning had nothing to do with unlimited spending and socialist Ponzi schemes were dead wrong. But the Congresspersons that were saying so from “high places” like Congress knew they were wrong. Durbin knows their positions proved to be ruinous to the economy, he said so with his Keynesian economics coffin comment.

So if they know that what they are demanding is destructive to the economy, why do they demad it? Why do throw epithets and dirty names at the ones who want to do the non-Keynesian things that would save the economy, or at least lessen the pain toward a more sensible economic policy?

Or, why do they want to do it, or, why do they think they have to do it?

Not all warnings are scare-mongering like Obama’s threats to unilaterally default on debt or let Granny starve if the Congress didn’t capitulate with the debt ceiling raise, which they did, giving up the constitutional duties of Congress to a committee of twelve Boss-selected legislators for no extra charge. But in the words of Rahm Emmanuel: “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste. And what I mean by that is an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before.”

Meaning, in their own words, they use “crisis” all the time to put one over on us and get us to go along with outrageous attacks on our liberty and our property that we would not have tolderated otherwise.

Although of course it could be they plan to use the dollar’s fall to ditch the dollar for a new one-world currency –but don’t call it “currency” just yet.

They could have just balanced the budget instead. Oh yeah, what budget? They could have legislated Ron Paul’s painless solution to buy time for a genuine solution.

Does anybody think this commitee selected by the same group of power brokers that have failed 117 times before already is going to do anything different? Or make a difference?

Ron Paul’s Urgent Warning on the Inevitable Collapse of the Dollar:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nltqJCjM_GA

The dollar is a “false balance” where the vendor, the Fed, tells you it it is equivalent to a dollar’s worth of gold, but they have their hands on the scale and every time they “print” more dollars or finance more dollar debt they are robbing you of value:

Proverbs 11:1  ¶A false balance is abomination to the LORD: but a just weight is his delight.

Hosea 12:7  ¶He is a merchant, the balances of deceit are in his hand: he loveth to oppress.

Don’t believe misinformation: Americans got screwed, Tea Party got screwed

Americans flipped the House of Representatives including a good number of the freshman class that were elected based on tea party promises to put the brakes on the unlimited bloated government and the tax increases that DC loves AND the runaway borrowing.

On this one, after more than 1

Tea Party Express says FOUR of those tea party freshmen got flipped when they voted for this surrender to the Bloated Government Party deal. This giveaway to Bloated Government and Runaway Spending by freshmen who pledged otherwise is why Ron Paul is so admired in his own district, including by his political enemies.

The credit agencies are long-term worried about the fast-growing debt in the long-term. Democrats forced this agreement on wishy-washy Establishment Republicans who bent over with glee.

Now the Dems are wailing like the rabbit who got the fox to throw it into the briar patch in the old fable, but in this tale the rabbit is still complaining about the briar patch as if he got the short end. It’s like the merchant in the plaza who screws you with an outrageous price you think you negotiated and he’s loudly protesting that HE is losing money on the deal.

Here is this RINO David Frum who repeats the lies about Americans and about this “agreeement”

Can you believe that a “Republican” could say this with a straight face?!

Forcing the United States to the verge of default.

Shrugging off the needs and concerns of millions of unemployed.

Protecting every single loophole, giveaway and boondoggle in the tax code as a matter of fundamental conservative principle.

Massive government budget cuts in the midst of the worst recession since World War II.

(1) FACT: OBAMA WAS THE DEFAULT DECIDER, IT WAS A LYING SNEAKY SCARE TACTIC.
Lie number one, and if this guy is as smart as he purports, he KNOWS it’s a lie. Obama’s was the decision as to what to do with receits and he even left himself an out in case the new House called his bluff on it.

(2) The “loophole, giveaway and boondoggle” is a favorite phrase of people who want to keep the debt-fueled gravy-train going precisely for every “loophole, giveaway and boondoggle”. That includes million-dollar cowboy poetry festivals, studies of shrimp on treadmills, the worse-than-useless official Bloated Government Propaganda Ministry (aka “public broadcasting”), and giving General Electric CEO Jeffrey Immelt a pass to pay zero taxes on $5 BILLION domestic profits on U.S. business while complaining about loopholes.

Besides, Bloated Government opponents have real examples of this lying conniving farce of giveaways and loopholes. Americans elected tea party types to STOP these boondoggles.

The biggest boondoggle is the MALICIOUS LIE that stopping bloat and shrinking government would “shrugging off the needs and concerns of millions of unemployed”. That’s a handy excuse for bloating government and filling the pockets of special interests under the cover of a banner claiming to do it “for the poor”.

Since when has the War on Poverty eliminated poverty in America? Ever since LBJ began this MOTHER OF BOONDOGGLES, poverty has not improved according to shills like this guy and his Republicrat friends. It’s always “worse” and it’s always a “crisis” and they always weep over their favorite lying story when anybody who wants to cut off the spigot of free money for Congress and their friends in high and low places both, where corporations and unions come together, where Wall Street marries Marxism in the presidential cabinet and in laws passed like this one.

The unemployed need the prosperity of the free market to come back. How can a market operate freely in this climate?

If the local sheriff hovered over the stalls in your local farmers’ market stalls demanding that the farmers hire more help, or else he will confiscate your savings and hire more help himself, what do you think they’re going to do? Rush out to hire more help or hide the “loot” from the sheriff.

We used to call that a crooked sheriff.

And everybody ignored the elephant in the room. Ron Paul suggested that they could just simply tell the Federal Reserve to “forgive” the “debt” of $1.6 trillion dollars from when the Fed created that debt with dollars pulled out of thin air.

Get this from radical extremist lefist rag New Republic:

http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/91224/ron-paul-debt-ceiling-federal-reserve

Unlike the debt held by Social Security, the debt held by the Fed is not tied to any specific obligations. The bonds held by the Fed are assets of the Fed. It has no obligations that it must use these assets to meet. There is no one who loses their retirement income if the Fed doesn’t have its bonds. In fact, there is no direct loss of income to anyone associated with the Fed’s destruction of its bonds. This means that if Congress told the Fed to burn the bonds, it would in effect just be destroying a liability that the government had to itself, but it would still reduce the debt subject to the debt ceiling by $1.6 trillion. This would buy the country considerable breathing room before the debt ceiling had to be raised again. President Obama and the Republican congressional leadership could have close to two years to talk about potential spending cuts or tax increases. Maybe they could even talk a little about jobs.

Guess where they were quoted?

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011/07/ron-paul-suggests-using-fed-to-end-run-debt-ceiling-impasse.html

That’s right, you might have something going when a radical leftist rag and “the naked capitalist” agree on a good idea, neither of which group Ron Paul would even necessarily identify with. Ron Paul is “his own man”, so to speak, and does not let compromise interfere with his vote.

The U.S. Congress has raised the debt ceiling some 117 times in history.

Fool me once, shame on me. Fool me twice shame on you. Fool me 117 tmies, WHAT IS THE MATTER WITH US?

Remembering Honduras’ Defense of Freedom

Whatever you say about politicians in general, Micheletti was indeed the man for the hour in Honduras and they were blessed that it was him and not some other easy traitor. Zelaya was obviously preparing a fraudulent “referendum” and there would be no fair elections. The Chavez-style leaders knew this and joined the scam, and gladly used some of the ignorant gullible –Lenin’s “useful idiots”– who thought that helping a few elites –like Zelaya and his sponsors– confiscate the material wealth of the other elites– they would get some of the bounty. Or just make it “fair”. Or something. In reality, they just go along with the droning chants.

I’ve been reading about how Chavez consolidated power in Venezuela and it reminded me of the contrast with Honduras.

Some of the leftist disinformation media tries to make the leftist street protests that supported Zelaya as if they were massive uprisings, but they were piddling few, blocking traffic, throwing rocks and burning tires and scaring the rest of the citizens.

Beware and take a lesson, Americas: a lot of the people on the streets and taking part in the violence were teachers on strike. Lobo, the current president, seems to be ceding to demands from citizens to fire any teacher who doesn’t teach, but back then they got almost no schooling.

And they blame the rich and capitalists for the kids’ ignorance? Hello?

The search engines are no good anymore. Leftist lies are positioned at the top, and if we ask Google they’ll tell you, “Our formulas and algorithms are fair. TRUST US.” We need some competition in search engines.

But here is a quick 50-second shot on youtube of the demonstration by citizens in just one city in Honduras repudiating the auto-coup master Manuel Zelaya, supporting the constitutional ouster of the renegade criminal. The so-called Resistencia, which is nothing more than a front organization for a sociaalist-imperialist takeover of the country that wants to give it up to international Chavista-Stalinist socialism.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2NsZYRbFpY&NR=1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bZKEzSdtk1Q

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZLn_LIEOS0&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzmL5SisokQ&feature=related

“Fuera Mel!” “No fue golpe!”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rL3TqjA_LUA&NR=1

San Pedro demonstrations, huge:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xp2SlWtW_Bw&feature=related

This one includes a snapshot of Patricia Rodas with an overlay of her quote that “I am not the ‘power behind the throne’!” She was the brains, Zelaya was the puppet. She was the evil intelligence and manipulator behind the power, Zelaya’s high school classmates remember him as one the slowest learners there. They remember one day when he announced in class one day that he was going to president one day, and they all got a good long hearty laugh.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YYyBIPthwH0&feature=related

More than 100,000 gathered in the capital to demonstrate in favor of Zelaya’s ouster and supporting the constitutional presidency of Micheletti:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rze7UpC4pwQ&feature=related

That’s at least 10% of the entire population of men plus women plus children! Meaning it could have been more than half the entire adult population!

Across the country it was the same kind of turnout. The people were furious at CNN’s blatantly biased coverage.

It is a learning experience to note that in the earliest hours following their coverage of the vote in Congress that culminated the impeachment proceedings that were already underway before Sunday June 28, 2009, CNN-Spanish changed their “coup” banner at the bottom of the screen to “forced succession of power” because of something noted in the evening by one of their news anchors. She said that CNN had received thousands of calls from Hondurans supporting the constitutional removal of Zelaya and NOT ONE IN FAVOR OF ZELAYA, and if there was anyone who supported Zelaya could they PLEASE call?

It did not take long for the disinformation agents to kick in their schtick, though, and after about a day of a slight nod to the truth, and they went back to the “coup” designation.

Meantime, Hondurans on June 30 spilled out into their central plazas to protest the disinformation against them in international media and the unfair treatment of international political organizations that were themselves upset that an upstart banana republic dared to challenge the socialist narrative.

Honduras said NO to Chavez.

They said they DON’T want to become another Cuba or Venezuela.

They said they are NOT fooled by class warfare demagoguery.

Let us hope they stay firm against the slow infiltration by ememies of freedom.

They will have their Beast of Revelation, their one-world coming dictatorship, but there will be some nations that will refuse to bow.

prwatch.org: They’ve been reporting all spin and disinformation since 1994..

Their piece on Honduras is all spin, framing the constitutional removal of golpista Zelaya and preventing his planned coup de grace of June 28, 2009. Letting him choose exile over prison was dubious (which one would you have chosen) but the Congress was already into impeachment process, formalized that Sunday, in full view of everyone in the audience of CNNE (CNN’s Spanish channel).

…The PR attack on Honduras’ defense of freedom began when Zelaya changed into pajamas for the press conference in Costa Rica that day. Neighbors to the Palace saw him in a suit and tie leaving as arrested, and photos of this were used as evidence in the trials of soldiers later.

The American Ambassador said it was a coup, but the guy’s name is mud in Honduras because he had his own shady financial dealings in Honduras. With all the government money Zelaya was robbing and giving to his sicarios who knows but maybe Hugo “Mud” Llorens had an iron in the fire?

Cut to the OAS, whose secretary-general Insulza began his political career telling Salvador Allende as his “political adviser” in Chile how to destroy the private economy and with it any financial base for opposition. He was also an enthusiastic supporter of Allende’s ambitions to become a president for life —oh they hate that when it’s a “rightist”, meaning not their own brand of rich, don’t they?.

Surprise, surprise, they found tens of thousands of arms stashed away in GOVERNMENT warehouses across the country in Chile under Allende’s rule.

And speaking of PR spin, when members of Allende’s Marxist regime attacked military squads and engaged in full-scale battles with them, the fallen among the guilty was reported outside the country as mysterious “disappearances”. The real victim was the international public that was fed spin.

And they are still doing it. They claim to attack evil corporations and evil oil speculators, but guess where some of their major funding comes from. George Soros is only the most visible face of the ones who are the real genuine capitalist pig, trying to game the system around the world including here, which will, of course, guarantee his own profits and our own losses.

The truth is that when it’s all said and done, it’s the Mom and Pop owners of the little store down the street and the barber shop that are the ones who are hurt when the supposedly “anti-corporate” demagogues get their control freak measures enforced against the private sector. The idea is that after they destroy all the profits in profit motives they’ll be the ones in charge of the public treasury.

How did that work out for Russia? How did that work out for China?

The fact is, Hondurans did NOT want to be another Venezuela, they did NOT want to be another Cuba. ESPECIALLY the poor, who had the most to lose, because when all you have is a little bit, it’s a lot when you lose it.

Let’s just hope they don’t wear down under the relentless pounding of the liars in the media and their enablers in “media watchdog” front groups like this well-funded organization.

Let’s hear it. Where do THEY get THEIR funding?