How the legislative, executive, and judicial branches oppress us together

The legislatures of the country “outsourced” the legislative activity to the executive, in a clear incestuous violation of the Constitution. Funding entire bureaucracies of people whose entire job is to write new regulations AND enforce them AND they outsourced the judicial function to “ADMINISTRATIVE” judgeships.

But what’s worse than that is that all those “creative” rules writers do not even obey the rules that they impose upon the subjects of the royal realm, as in royal pain in the ass realm.

What’s more they enforce them upon those who resist or even just protest. We all know that every president, every single one, since Nixon, has had a sycophant IRS that targets audits, reviews, and all on any well-publicized critic, especially if the critic is exposing actual crimes for which the president should have been arrested, tried, convicted, and spent the remaining years of life in prison.

Larry Nichols made sure every single Congressmen got the list of Bill Clinton’s crimes, not just the serial rapes: drug running protection for his brother’s drug smuggling operation (Governor Clinton later pardoned the brother’s partner in drug crimes but politically had to let his brother serve the sentence) and the associated murders of a couple of teenagers who stumbled upon the clandestine airfield, the money laundering, the hits on enemies. When Nichols presented Governor Clinton with the evidence committed in his own department, the next day a big front-page story appeared accusing Nichols.

Since the UNITED STATES CONGRESS does not follow the friggin Constitution, why should the President??!! Why should the Courts??

After all, ever since Chief Justice Marshall of the Supreme Court declared a law unconstitutional without even trying to justify this power coup by the Constitution itself, who could expect the Court to abide by the Constitution?

And since even the judges with “strict constructionist” and “original intent” on The Court (aka “conservatives”) obey the principle of “precedent” and “case law” as if it were more sacred than their own oaths and more sacred than their own professions of religious faith, why should anybody expect them to roll back the power of the federal government that gives them such dictatorial power?

What “balance of power” is this? They have collaboration. They are a triumvirate ruling structure. What about the people? This is no rule of law! This is decree and enforcement!

Psalm 94:20 Shall the throne of iniquity have fellowship with thee, which frameth mischief by a law?
21 They gather themselves together against the soul of the righteous, and condemn the innocent blood. 22 But the LORD is my defence; and my God is the rock of my refuge.
23 And he shall bring upon them their own iniquity, and shall cut them off in their own wickedness; yea, the LORD our God shall cut them off.

And that goes for the warmongers too.
I am for peace: but when I speak, they are for war.-Psalm 120:7


%d bloggers like this: