Climategate,2.0: Fraud Reconfirmed (Again…and Again…)

New Climategate Emails « Climate Audit:
http://climateaudit.org/2011/11/22/new-climategate-emails/

Some real juicy ones this time..more than the last.

It sure looks timed to make a foreboding shadow over yet another official “science” conference sponsored by the usual international order oligarchies.. Can we call it an irony that secretive taxpayer-funded secretive communications are being exposed using a Russian server?

Doozies indeed..

http://noconsensus.wordpress.com/2011/11/22/climategate-2-0/#more-12598

1939> Thorne/MetO:

Observations do not show rising temperatures throughout the tropical
troposphere unless you accept one single study and approach and discount a
wealth of others. This is just downright dangerous. We need to communicate the
uncertainty and be honest. Phil, hopefully we can find time to discuss these
further if necessary […]

<3066> Thorne:

I also think the science is being manipulated to put a political spin on it
which for all our sakes might not be too clever in the long run.

<1611> Carter:

It seems that a few people have a very strong say, and no matter how much
talking goes on beforehand, the big decisions are made at the eleventh hour by
a select core group.

<2884> Wigley:

Mike, The Figure you sent is very deceptive […] there have been a number of
dishonest presentations of model results by individual authors and by IPCC […]

<4755> Overpeck:

The trick may be to decide on the main message and use that to guid[e] what’s
included and what is left out.

<2495> Humphrey/DEFRA:

I can’t overstate the HUGE amount of political interest in the project as a
message that the Government can give on climate change to help them tell their
story. They want the story to be a very strong one and don’t want to be made
to look foolish.

// The Settled Science ///

<0310> Warren:

The results for 400 ppm stabilization look odd in many cases […] As it stands
we’ll have to delete the results from the paper if it is to be published.

[…In this next one, he’s afraid of what their political
sponsors might do to them:..]

<1682> Wils:

[2007] What if climate change appears to be just mainly a multidecadal natural fluctuation? They’ll kill us probably […]

<4758> Osborn:

Because how can we be critical of Crowley for throwing out 40-years in the
middle of his calibration, when we’re throwing out all post-1960 data ‘cos the
MXD has a non-temperature signal in it, and also all pre-1881 or pre-1871 data
‘cos the temperature data may have a non-temperature signal in it!

<1577> Jones:

[FOI, temperature data]
Any work we have done in the past is done on the back of the research grants we
get – and has to be well hidden. I’ve discussed this with the main funder (US
Dept of Energy) in the past and they are happy about not releasing the original
station data.

Advertisements

One Response to “Climategate,2.0: Fraud Reconfirmed (Again…and Again…)”

  1. BREAKING => Former Advisor To Margaret Thatcher ‘The Iron Lady’ Pursues Fraud Charges Against Climategate Scientists! | Political Vel Craft Says:

    […] Climategate,2.0: Fraud Reconfirmed (Again…and Again…) (trutherator.wordpress.com) […]

Comments are closed.


%d bloggers like this: