Posts Tagged ‘Republicans’

Free people own guns, slaves don’t

March 24, 2013
Dred Scott

Dred Scott (Photo credit: elycefeliz)

Found at the Libertarian Christians web site:

http://libertarianchristians.com/2009/02/13/40-reasons-to-ban-guns/

This is an excerpt from the Supreme Court Dred Scott decision, that declared blacks cannot be real people because then they’d be able to bear arms and defend themselves, and then slaves of the same color then would see them with them, and this would encourage “discontent” among the slaves and might result in insubordination among them. This would be a danger to the “state”, said the Court.

 

image

Fiscal Cliff: The Reality

December 6, 2012
Ron Paul at the 2007 National Right to Life Co...

Ron Paul at the 2007 National Right to Life Convention, held at Crown Center Hyatt Regency in Kansas City, MO; June 15, 2007, (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The analysis of articles like this one is basic Keynesianism, which means it’s an ignorant piece of crap that it takes a bunch of years in college to learn how to make it sound sophisticated:
http://www.news.com.au/business/markets/fiscal-cliff-whats-a-fiscal-cliff-and-whys-it-called-a-fiscal-cliff-fiscal-cliff/story-e6frfm30-1226531233642

The article made it sound like a “compromise” between taxes and spending would solve the problem coming up on January 1 of 2013.

When has such a “compromise” ever solved “the problem” in the 100 years since the Fed got hold of the currency and banking systems? This is the same problem that has come back again and again every 10 or 20 years, it is the same circular route they’ve gone over, again and again, all these “compromises” only kicked the can down the road some more.

Here’s a real breakdown with details in the clear about what’s really wrong and what’s going to happen on January 1:

http://www.moneyandmarkets.com/transcript-the-great-fiscal-cliff-of-2012-13-part-i-4-50405

(Another perspective comes from not just Patrick Buchanan but others who agree with telling the House to just call the White House bluff. The President is pointing the new media gun at them to extort his will, that’s why all the campaigning after the campaign, but he has a LOT more to lose in the long run, if the Republicans had any guts, or any genuine honesty about all this).

The real “fiscal cliff” is the (for now) slow plummeting in the value of the US dollar, a process that’s been going on from the time the U.S. Congress gave a private bankers’ cartel monopoly control over the United States currency.

THE REAL PROBLEM:

The real problem is too much government spending. Letting the rich invest their resources is NOT the problem. The real problem is too much government doing what government should never do.

Government spending robs the economy of whatever it would otherwise produce with those resources. Instead of the people making their individual decisions to mutual benefit, this government wealth confiscation to get resources to non-sustainable demand, private economy and jobs lose out.

Republicans are addicted to this too, which is why they rush to “surrender” to the Democrats so much to avoid the crises. They pontificate and posture until there is a very public and publicized crisis so they can get cover for caving.

THE REPUBLICAN PARTY ESTABLISHMENT BLEW OFF TWO GREAT OPPORTUNITIES

The Republicans had two opportunities to prove they were honest.

One was in the debt ceiling “crisis” of 2011. The Republicans in the House could have said “Just say no”. In fact they did until the Powers That Be (Boehner) got four of the holdouts to cave in, including the “controversial” Allen West. Maybe they told them if they didn’t they’d cave in their head for them.

Surrender did not suit the (retired) Colonel Allen West very well in the debt ceiling fight, and it did him no good in his re-election campaign. It could be he won in his district in the real numbers, how do 4,000 votes suddenly appear on one side of an election to flip the results?

In fact, the presidential vote looks suspicious. Note that the voters did NOT give any win to the President like the yappers on televised yap shows say, it gave Washington the same stalemated situation they have had.

Boehner is pushing to cave and they will pretty much.

And we will continue our fall off the real fiscal cliff, the fall of the dollar combined with the attack on the economic prosperity engine undertaken by Imperial Washington, now occupied by political enemies of the free market and political liberties…

The other chance they had was the candidacy of Ron Paul and his realistic, pragmatic program for addressing the root problems in Washington. The Party adopted a couple of the most important economic platform points as a nod to reality, the audit of the Fed, and a nod to the gold standard.

In other words, as a Party, if the platform means anything, they admitted they were NOT doing the right thing.

But they also showed they were not serious about being honest with the way the chair broke their own rules to ride roughshod over the Ron Paul delegates and changing rules to keep them down and keep real conservatives out.

Help the Poor By Lowering Taxes on Investors

November 16, 2012
2006 Tax Forms

2006 Tax Forms (Photo credit: herzogbr)

There goes Obama again with that same stupid argument that he knows is bogus:

The president went on to insist that any agreement that deals with the so-called “fiscal cliff” allows taxes to rise for households making more than $250,000. “When it comes to the top 2 percent, what I’m not going to do is extend further a tax cut for folks that don’t need it,” he said.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/11/14/obama-holds-post-election-press-conference/?intcmp=obinsite#ixzz2CL09lUCm

Keeping the taxes from going up for the “rich” includes the people who own the small businesses that hire the LITTLE GUY.

I say he knows, because he knows that we want to KEEP TAXES AS THEY ARE and HE wants to RAISE them by doing nothing. That “we” is not Republicans, it’s the ones who are aware that THE problem with the budget is the SPENDING problem.

We want our employers to have more money for OUR paychecks. I want them for the POOR, so that the people who have the money to invest get to have it long enough to invest, so that the POOR can have more jobs available, and so the POOR who have the persistence and understanding have a chance to build more wealth.

Why should we let somebody else get in the middle and take a cut?

Government already takes nearly half our production, it’s already too much!

Billionaire tax hike advocates: Shut up and just hire us instead!

July 3, 2012

This shows what’s wrong with believing the polls without thinking between the lines.

http://nationaljournal.com/columns/all-powers/the-tax-gamble-20120619

Similarly, a mid-April CBS News/New York Times poll found that 56 percent of all voters (and 57 percent of independents) said the “best way to promote economic growth” was to raise taxes on the wealthy and “spend more on education and the nation’s infrastructure.” A CNN/ORC poll conducted around the same time found 68 percent of voters (and 67 percent of independents) agreed “the tax system benefits the rich and is unfair to the ordinary working man or woman.”
These polls are rigidly consistent with every internal Obama campaign poll and the overwhelming reaction of focus groups. With an assurance that may startle hand-wringing Democrats, Team Obama doesn’t believe the campaign has been fully joined and Romney has not been remotely tested on his fidelity to GOP tax orthodoxy. Obama and his top advisers are certain—and they exude airy nonchalance in the face of intra-party vapors to prove it—that Romney is the perfect vessel for their tax-villainy argument

You might think it also shows how inept Republicans are on the tax issue, but credibility and hidden lines in legislation and enforcement have themselves wrapped around it tighter than a professionally gift-wrapped box of goodies.

Most big-name Republicans are thinking that if they blew the whistle on Obama’s weakest points on the subject of taxes and the rich and poor, they would expose themselves.

Major Garrett missed the point in the linked article, I think.

But a lot of pollsters don’t miss it. They could blow the whistle on the scam but that would be biting the hand that feeds them.

Okay, okay, here’s the trick, and the irony, and the sarcasm, and the scam.

If you ask me whether “the tax system benefits the rich and is unfair to the ordinary working man or woman”, you bet that in less than one instant I would agree as fast as I could. I don’t know who could honestly disagree with it, for one reason or the other, except a few who might recognize the use somebody’s going to make of the answer. By that I mean there might be some people who recognize that if they say they agree, it will be viewed as saying they are for “raising taxes on the rich”.

The whole thing is unfair to everybody when government is in the middle, because they are the absolute worst middleman between somebody with money and somebody without it. A lot of Mafia dons do better work with the money they steal from other people, and a lot of that is money they get from people voluntarily, like with the drugs and illegal betting and such things. Taxes are not voluntary.

But it’s worse than all that.

The tax system we have in the USA right now is unfair and benefits the rich because while the middle class has to pay them, many of the very biggest and richest investors do not. Warren Buffet blew the whistle on himself, if fact, but he left out some of the most important factors.

He pays a lower percentage than his secretary for two reasons. He has an army of tax attorneys at beck and call, who it is fair to presume not only know how to squeeze the best for the boss out of the “tax system”, and his companies, but also presumably help write the laws.

And note the lying deceit in Buffet’s demand for more and higher estate taxes from this tycoon. In Nebraska, higher estate taxes would kill off family farms faster than anything, as they already do, along with a tax and regulation system that big agribusiness has little problem with.

When CNBC or FBC want to know how something will affect businesses, they interview the CEO’s of the very biggest companies. But where it counts most is for the small businesses. Sure, some of the tax and borrow revenues in government, all of them in fact almost, hurt business big and small, but not equally.

So, we agree, the present tax system isn’t fair, we need more investment and innovation in areas like laser technology, medicine –especially natural remedies and nutrition-based preventive education, good academic education in general, housing, cold-fusion technology, and the economy in general. But most of us among the poor and middle class do not have the resources for it. So we need to unleash the investment power of those who have it.

To invest, though, they won’t know how much they’ll be able to actually use, unless they reasonably know they will have it. So if they are sitting on it, the fastest way to get them to actually invest it is to let them know you’ll leave them alone.

If they can invest it, they’ll hire the rest of us. Why wouldn’t they? Does that sound so complicated?

It’s not our money anyway, unless it is ours. Tell Buffet that’s all nice and good, but he doesn’t speak for the rest of us. We want hypocrites that preach at us to tax them more along with the other billionaires to SHUT UP AND USE THAT MONEY TO HIRE US AND INVEST.

After all, not all his billionaire peers make so much money from the largesse of politicians and demagogues. The Buffet business style has lost all its shiny glory.

And to tell their lobbyists to get the politicians to get their hands off and leave it alone!

“Thou shalt not steal.” That should have been the Republican Party answer to Buffet’s millionaire tax plan. But they can’t because they believe in the same taxation policy for their own ends.

Except for the ones that don’t. There are a small handful in Congress today that want Washington DC to stop stealing so much from the economy. They deserve attention, and they deserve more like colleagues.

Related articles:

 

CBS Caught Lying About Results of Colorado Caucus!

April 23, 2012

Mat Larson exposes another mainstream media lie about Ron Paul:
http://libertyvlogger.com/mainstream-media/ron-paul-cbs-caught-lying-about-results-of-colorado-caucus/

Romney gets to look increasingly like a throwaway candidate. He’s avoiding talking about his Massachusetts health care law, which requires individuals to purchase health insurance, because Americans hate hate hate the Obama nationalization of the medical industry and its co-ownership with Big Pharma and the semi-socialist AMA (which gets 70% of its funding from the federal government). They hate it at the rate of 70% to this day.

But even if he is a throwaway, Obama’s sponsors will not find much difference. Romney won’t throw out the Unaffordable Health Care Act, he’ll keep it and pretend to change something big by changing something meaningless. Romney will continue the endless Bush-Obama wars. Romney would continue to throw goodies to his Wall Street sponsors while criticizing them, just like Obama has done. Romney will continue the attacks on our freedoms, expanding on the most abominable and unconstitutional parts of the Patriot Act, NDAA, ACTA, police state power for federal agents to write their own secret warrants to search anywhere they feel like it, and to detain anybody the president deems a threat (where is that automatic signature machine?).

Make no mistake: Romney would also continue whatever efforts they’re doing under the radar to form a national civil federal police force akin to Hitler’s Brownshirts.

So Romney will avoid it, and Obama campaign will avoid it, but if -IF- Romney gets the nomination –and despite the spin, it is NOT settled yet– you can bet it will be a debate question and Romney will get plastered on it! “It was your idea, Romney!” And when they ask Romney what he’d do different, his answer will show his hem haw position straddles both sides of the fence and expose him as the same thing.

Romney’s corporate raids and offshore holdings will also kill him.

Neither of them can criticize their backers, both of them have Goldman Sachs and Wall Street in the list of their topmost supporters. Obama formed a PAC to answer the Republicans he said, but the media is covering by telling us Obama’s not getting the money the Republicans are. But what they don’t tell you is that Obama is going to get trillions worth of campaign donations “in kind”, in their own media reports.

But ever more people are waking up. You meet ex-Romney supporters, ex-Santorum supporters, ex-Gingrich supporters, ex-Obama supporters, but an ex-Ron Paul supporter is more rare than skin on a hen’s teeth!

Look at this:

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/28/us/massachusetts-health-insurance-mandate-stirs-dissent.html?pagewanted=all

Roughly 48,000 people in the state were subject to penalties for not having coverage in 2009, the latest year for which figures are available, down from 67,000 in 2007. The maximum penalties range from $228 to $1,212 a year, depending largely on income. (Anyone with an annual income of less than 150% of the federal poverty line pays no penalty.) The penalties are paid on state tax returns.

Guess who isn’t getting Big Bank donations?

Found: Graphs showing economy’s “performance” 2009-2012

April 7, 2012

Obama Bashes Bush & Says Election Will Be “Fun Debate” …(Between Socialism and Freedom) | The Gateway Pundit:
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/04/obama-election-will-be-fun-debate-between-socialism-and-freedom/

I was quite impressed at the collection of graphs on the web page. They quote him saying “It’s always good to have the truth on your side”.

That much is true, but it’s out of context, because the truth does not help his message at all. “The truth is lies” one might say. Oh well…

Look at this quip they included from the AP:

Obama revisited many of the same arguments he made earlier in the week during a speech to newspaper executives, in which he framed the election as a choice between his work to use government to help people prosper and Republicans who would let average Americans struggle while pushing policies that help the wealthy few.

The charts they generously shared with us show how much his policies are helping crush the middle class.

A Christian writer once said, “God must really love the poor, he made so many of them!”

But it seems socialists and leftists don’t think God made enough poor people, because they are making so many more of them.

But since are mostly in the employ of a selected group of super-rich, aided by idealists who are deceived by the academic demagoguery like I once was, they can’t really touch those super-rich. So they push their potential rivals back down, using glass ceilings crimping small business made of regulations, a legal counterfeiting operation that robs the poor and middle class every time they “print money”.

Ron Paul gets one of his strongest results so far, and the count still might beat Romney’s

February 12, 2012

“Breakthrough in Maine! Ron Paul exceeds expectations yet again”:
http://www.ronpaul.com/2012-02-11/ron-paul-comes-in-a-strong-second-in-maine-with-36/

It looks the party bosses have “officially” declared Romney the winner in Maine, even though not all the votes are counted from all the precincts, and the (heh heh) “unofficial” actual count will still change with the pending votes.

And it’s a virtual tie. But is it? Romney only has 194 votes on Ron Paul so far with 83.7% of precincts reporting.

Washington County (pop. 32,856) postponed its caucuses due to the threat of 1-3″ of snow (which did not materialize). They will be voting next Saturday. However, Maine GOP Executive Director Michael Quatrano announced that the official results are permanent and will not be changed when the new votes come in.

Washington County GOP Chairman Chris Gardner objected, saying he had known his county’s tally wouldn’t be included in Saturday’s announcement but didn’t realize it wouldn’t be counted at all. He said he had called state party leaders and “expressed my complete and utter dismay.”

Some have called Washington County a “Ron Paul stronghold” that could have propelled Ron Paul to a Maine victory. Ron Paul campaign chairman Jesse Benton suggested that the Romney campaign was involved in the cancellation of the caucus as Paul’s campaign had expected to do well: “It’s not completely insidious, but they knew we were going to swamp it up there.”

In 2008 Ron Paul got 8 out of 113 votes (7%) while Mitt Romney received 40 out of 113 votes (35%) in the county. If Romney had remained stagnant at 40 votes and Ron Paul had received an additional 227 votes (+ in Washington County, Paul would have won Maine.

Paul camp cries fraud over Nevada Caucus results

February 11, 2012
Ron Paul, member of the United States House of...

Image via Wikipedia

Is this why Romney seemed so smug and confident for so long?

Paul camp cries fraud over Nevada Caucus results – National Independent | Examiner.com:
http://www.examiner.com/independent-in-national/paul-camp-cries-fraud-over-nevada-caucus-results

The Controlled Media complex has told us what to think.

We’re supposed to think that Romney is a front-runner and favored by party bosses, but that he has the best chance to defeat Obama out of the four major Republican candidates. Favored by the boss-man, that much is credible. Best chance to defeat Obama, they ALL know that Ron Paul is the best one to beat Obama. Early polls that matched up the candidates with Obama all showed this, but it looks like they’ve learned how to skewer those numbers too. Not that polls are that much believable either way, in my opinion. In some “respected” polls in the not-so-distant past, the results were totally and obviously wrong.

The Nevada results do not pass the smell test. They do not pass the smell test. Repeated for emphasis. The Nevada results do not pass the smell test.

 

Clint Eastwood, Chrysler ad, and the real issues

February 9, 2012

The buzz is on about Clint Eastwood lending himself to the Superbowl Chrysler ad, but a lot of reaction is missing the point.

It’s true that there’s a subtle pro-Obama effect in this, but the whole brouhaha also exposes establishment Country Club Republicans‘ ugly weak big-government underbelly. It’s ugly as sin, just as bad as the Dems they are criticizing.

Americans absolutely hate the Wall Street bailouts, with a passion. Big Money-Big Corporate Press is happy to forget all that and help Americans forget it, but they STILL hate it.

George W. Bush started those bailouts but Obama even skipped out from the campaign to go to Washington to vote for it, so none of them can criticize the other guy for that one.

But Obama’s minions do it anyway, but not directly, by talking a lot against Wall Street while not doing one thing to press for prosecution of the ones who engaged even in criminal fraud. I’m sure they’re protecting the system from collapse by trying to shore up public confidence, eh, wink wink?

But the Chrysler and GM bailouts were money from government for companies, but at the expense of the creditors who actually put up the money, and a freebie to the union bosses and payoffs to them and their worker bee subjects to keep them pacified.

It’s not a formula for future growth, depending on government.

Bankruptcy still would have hurt creditors to the auto companies, but then the union bosses and Big Money Unions and their Big Money Lobbyists did not want to lose their money.

Big Money Unions nowadays at least are just like the big corporations their executive bosses are always ragging on about, with the $300,000 salaries for executives while the assembly line guy gets leftovers.

 

Jack Abramoff names Gingrich as corrupt and flip-flopping chameleon

January 29, 2012

Michael Savage has lost credibility with some of his attacks on Ron Paul, but Jack Abramoff now calls himself a libertarian. He named names in his book and one of the names was Gingrich:

Abramoff credits [Michael] Savage for prison epiphany:
http://www.wnd.com/2012/01/abramoff-credits-savage-for-prison-epiphany/

He said Gingrich was unpredictable, flip-flopper, and one of the most corrupt in Washington.

I don’t know who was thinking what when they went after Jack Abramoff, but now he’s naming names and telling on all the bad guys and blowing the whistle on the whole system.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 91 other followers