Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

It is Dangerous to be Right When the Government is Wrong

May 20, 2013

http://tinyurl.com/mxuhapo

(Pre-note: She never said “conspiracy” in the snippets I saw, and says clearly she’s talking about their pursuit of money…)

The name of Lauryn Hill’s breakout album was The Miseducation of Lauryn Hill but it now appears that the powers that be would like her to record a new album called The Re-Education of Lauryn Hill. After appearing in court for tax evasion, Hill was sentenced to three months in jail PLUS she must attend “counseling” due to her “conspiracy theories”.

According to the IBTimes, Hill told the court: “I am a child of former slaves who had a system imposed on them. I had an economic system imposed on me.” Furthermore, Hill also believes that artists are being oppressed by (what the article calls) “a plot involving the military and media”. Because of these statements, Hill was ordered to undergo “counseling”, which is a way of saying that she is mentally ill and that she needs some sort of re-programming session regain “sanity”.

Hah, call them “reprogramming” camps. That’s my name for what they used to call “deprogramming”, to redo the programming that so-called “cults” undid (“Cult”: any upstart new religious movement that no longer believed like they were supposed to as good little serfs)..

She’s “ill” and needs “counseling” because she says that there is big money in the big labels that like to produce mindless drivel and keep out deep and maverick thinking from the market….

Oh, and the military is involved in music things. Nah. Why? Just because Sargent Barry was played every hour on stations across the country, and the Okie from Muskogee hates anti-war demonstrators? Are you kidding? “Art and music”, she says. Oh right. There sure aren’t any adrenalin-pumping military action movies, are there? Why, “The Recruit” could have been made by Al Qaeda, it’s so neutral!

Zero Dark Thirty? Nah… Rolling Stones music would be real bad for military operations, after all, right? They would never let them play a concert on a battleship speeding toward the Falklands, would they?

She just doesn’t appreciate the fine upstanding “spread e’m ho’” music, that’s all. Why the stuff she calls “mindless drivel” gets invited to the best establishments in the nation, even the White House!!

Disclaimer: Some of the above is satire…

It is Dangerous to be Right When the Government is Wrong:
http://www.amazon.com/Dangerous-Right-When-Government-Wrong/dp/B00A16SG4U

NYT: Obama Administration Aware of IRS Scandal 5 Months Before Election

May 18, 2013

http://tinyurl.com/aca8odz

They’re finally reporting what was obvious to a lot of Americans in 2012… Election rigging is an ancient art of those who have power in a republic…

In no uncertain terms and with no hedging, The New York Times reports that the Obama administration was aware of the fact that the IRS was targeting Tea Party groups as far back as June of 2012. The Treasury Department’s Inspector General confirmed that he told senior Treasury officials in June of 2012, a full five months before Election Day:

The Treasury Department’s inspector general told senior Treasury officials in June 2012 he was investigating the Internal Revenue Service’s screening of politically active organizations seeking tax exemptions, disclosing for the first time on Friday that Obama administration officials were aware of the matter during the presidential campaign year.

We still don’t know for sure what the President knew or when he knew it, but this does confirm that the administration was aware of the fact that Obama’s political enemies were under fire by the IRS and covered that fact up during an election year.

How the Iraq War Became a War on Christians | The American Conservative

May 11, 2013

Deserves to be read:
http://www.theamericanconservative.com/articles/how-the-iraq-war-became-a-war-on-christians/

The Pope’s emissary to Bush warned him with what would happen if Bush invaded Iraq, the same things that lots of anti-war voices of all political stripes were also saying…

In March 2003, on the eve of war in Iraq, Pope John Paul II dispatched Cardinal Pio Laghi, a senior Vatican diplomat, to Washington to make a final plea to Bush not to invade. Laghi, chosen for his close ties to the Bush family, outlined “clearly and forcefully” the Vatican’s fears of what would follow an invasion: protracted war, significant casualties, violence between ethnic and religious groups, regional destabilization, “and a new gulf between Christianity and Islam.” The warning was not heeded.

Gold and silver have their own value, independent of fiat command

April 21, 2013

Beware of bogus warnings against gold and the untruths and flawed logic they use:

Like this one from India, but they only reflect their Keynesian bias and the Western media:
http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/slideshows/gold-prices-10-facts-about-the-yellow-metal/1-we-still-dont-own-enough-gold/slideshow/19652849.cms

1. There’s not enough gold?

Ha! That’s so funny! The price in dollars is so high compared to fiat dollars, that is. As a currency base, it would be more than enough, because then, the currency would be based on the value of gold, and other things would be priced in those terms.

What is the flawed logic here: There’s not enough gold to convert all the dollars to gold at today’s gold price, so there’s no way that a dollar can be converted to gold. Some of the flaws: (1) you know where all the gold is, you know how much there is, (2) there is no government manipulation in the price of gold, (3) central banks are not hoarding the gold, (4) to base currency on the market-determined value of gold would follow the same convertibility as today’s prices.

Just have all the central banks they’re going to convert from a dollar currency to a gold base and see just how lightning fast that “not enough” turns into “what can we do with all these extra worthless dollars?”

2. How can they know there aren’t any heretofore unknown gold reserves (in the ground, besides stashes), or that technology won’t make more of it available?

3. Oil went up when it became essential for trade. Gold will too. Also, as a currency base, its attribute as being independent of political corruption and bankers’ manipulations into fiat currency is something that is “priceless”.

4. China increasing its gold mining contradicts their other points, proves mine.

5. They embedded an outright lie here, or a blatant ignorance of the topic of the US Constitution on gold. It does NOT bar states from “coining money”, it clearly recognizes their right to do so. What the US Constitution DOES say, though, about coinage is that gold and silver are the ONLY acceptable medium for coinage.

And for humorous irony, they ask how it will work “given gold’s fluctuating prices”? The truth of the matter is that the dollar, and all fiat currency, fluctuates WILDLY in price, because it fluctuates in terms of real world goods and services, acquisition power. The US dollar, for example, gets you about 5% of what it got you in 1913, when the Federal Reserve was legislated.

6. They threw in an aside, saying there’s gold in your smart phone. That’s right, gold is worth something independent of politicians and bankers. Thank God.

7. There lies the gold, at the Federal Bank’s basements, like in the Die Hard movie, but now that Germany wants their gold back right now, the Fed is telling them it will rather take 5 years. Getting nervous, Bernanke?

That’s right, countries are getting concerned. Good reason. Thieves abound. Gaddafi was convincing African nations to join in a pan-African currency based on gold, and look what happened to him.

8. The smugglers’ market in gold only shows that it is probably underpriced at some point in the distribution.

9. Silver does “pack a punch”, and there’s nothing wrong with it. Perfect for currency too. Who said it had to be just gold only?

10. And yes, gold is here to stay.

File under: self-protection needs lots and LOTS of firepower

April 18, 2013

Homeowner Shoots & Kills Two Of Four Burglars In Attempted Home Invasion – Liberty Crier http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=luRVpnMvihM

How the very worst bad guys can get guns, the truth

April 7, 2013

The FBI Reports Military Gang Members Are Funneling Heavy Weapons To The Streets – Business Insider:
http://www.businessinsider.com/gang-members-military-weapons-2011-12

The FBI report mentions gang members are acquiring rifles, grenades, artillery rounds, and body armor.

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/gang-members-military-weapons-2011-12#ixzz2PoXM3i7B

Does any law enforcement officer that has not sold out the truth to his career advancement, really and truly think that banning this gun or that gun will stop the worst bad guys from getting the worst kind of weapons?

Besides the fact that the worst mass murderers of all of history have been governments, anything the military forces have not only the potential for getting into the black market, they already are getting sold outside any legal scrutiny.

Who will protect you from a government that turns on you? Maybe I should say “when” it turns on you? Already on the leaked Janet Napolitano “fusion centers” enemies list are supporters of Ron Paul, anybody who talks too much about the Constitution, anybody who complains too much about the government. It is no longer even a “secret” list like Nixon’s.

I wonder why they are giving this report publicity at this time. Maybe it’s an excuse for a cover for some arms confiscation dragnet, to get us –the people– to get used to the idea, or maybe to try to scare the public into demanding more gun confiscations.

Bracken: Stick To Your Guns -- No Matter What!

April 6, 2013

Reblogged from Western Rifle Shooters Association:

Click to visit the original post

Stick to your guns--no matter what!

by Matt Bracken

If they come to take away your guns by force, they have declared war on the Constitution, and on you. At that point, war is joined, just as it was during another famous gun confiscation raid on April 19, 1775.

If a firearm was legal in 2012, under the 2nd Amendment it’s still legal in 2013 and it will be legal forever, no matter what so-called "executive orders" are handed down or new "laws" are passed by a panicking Congress.

Read more… 964 more words

Good point: 1.Registration, 2.Confiscation, 3.Extermination. It has been done dozens of times. It is not even a new thing under the sun. When the Philistines ruled the Hebrews, they banned weapons for Hebrews but kept them for themselves of course.

UN Firearms Treaty: Disarm Victims Like at Wounded Knee, Rwanda, Sudan, Runaway Slaves

April 5, 2013

Pro Libertate: “State Control”: What the UN Firearms Treaty is All About:
http://freedominourtime.blogspot.com/2013/04/state-control-what-un-firearms-treaty.html

Piers Morgan, redcoat nation transplant, was aghast when one guest suggested the most important reason for having adequate means of self-defense, that being for defense against one’s own government. “Your own government?!” he asked in shock.

The UN is a club for dictators and kleptocracies, and after the shameless Great Looting For Big Banks of 2008-2009 presided over by both the George W Bush and Barack Obama administrations, we the people around the world can all see that this includes the people who have taken over the positions of political power in the United States.

The shew of their countenance doth witness against them; and they declare their sin as Sodom, they hide it not. Woe unto their soul! for they have rewarded evil unto themselves.–Isaiah 3:9

The article at the link above describes a State Department document from 1961 detailing a plan worked out in stages toward building up a world government that would be the only way to establish world peace. Of course their definition of world peace still allows governments to wage war on their own people.

The UN treaty still allows national governments to arm their own terrorist group surrogates. The article reminds us that the national-government exception was the excuse that United Nations operative Kofi Annan used to tell the commander of UN forces in Rwanda to stand down: The executors of the genocide of about a million people were connected to the national government.

So the first phase is apparently the disarming of civilian populations, that is, the subjects of national rulers, whoever they may be. The second would be the disarming and subjugation of nations that refuse to bow down to United Nations dictates. There is obvious overlap, because there is already a list of maverick nations that were quashed by UN forces under cover of George Soros’ new war mandate idea, supposedly saving civilian populations.

The nations who refused to sign this atrocious treaty at least included North Korea, Iran, Syria. These are the nations with governments who right now see themselves threatened by world order. The shocker is that so many other governments do not see themselves as losing control over their own country.

The representatives of the United States should be defending the natural rights of “We the People of the United States of America”, not brutal dictators. The worst dictatorship is the coming world government, so long dreamed of by certain cliques of powers that be.

Better to go with the side that finishes last.

And he shall plant the tabernacles of his palace between the seas in the glorious holy mountain; yet he shall come to his end, and none shall help him.-Daniel 11:45

Revelation 19:15 And out of his mouth goeth a sharp sword, that with it he should smite the nations: and he shall rule them with a rod of iron: and he treadeth the winepress of the fierceness and wrath of Almighty God.

Isaiah 1:18 Come now, and let us reason together, saith the Lord: though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool.

Harvard Lecture On Libertarianism – Liberty Crier

April 1, 2013
Ron Paul Forever

Ron Paul Forever (Photo credit: KAZVorpal)

Harvard Lecture On Libertarianism – Liberty Crier:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=wa0JkNoyHYk

Whether you are just you, or a group of you, or a great multitude of you, or a majority of anything, to force us to contribute what is ours to your causes?

This professor takes a Harvard class through the concepts and hopefully makes them confront the confiscatory ideas they have about good causes justifying theft. One student supposedly defending the libertarian idea that taxation is theft were saying that sometimes that’s justified. That means he only has a partial idea.

But treating others as they expect to be treated, they’ll fall short. I’ll prove it.

All of these students are Harvard students. No matter how you calculate it, these are kids of privilege of whom almost none of them can say they worked hard to get there. Even the ones on scholarships are there because somebody else didn’t. But the principle of taking from the rich to help the poor is never one that measures whether somebody got the wealth fairly.

Now ask them if it’s okay for some hypothetical dictator to tell them now they had to give up 25 percent of what they have right now to help a good cause, if they say they don’t want to contribute voluntarily. Tell them as representatives of the country’s elites that you’ll take donations and if you’re not satisfied with the results you’ll take the rest.

They’ll say No!

True story: I went to another lesser known Ivy League university on pure scholarship and financial aid. I went to an open party that some students liked to throw for their own reasons, where lots of people showed up. After a while, a local bikers’ club showed up and asked for voluntary donations to come up with bail for a buddy in jail. I left the party early because my buddy really wanted to go. He and I didn’t have anything on us, but he didn’t like the “vibes”.

Turns out he was right. An hour or two later, this gang was not satisfied with their collections and took out their chains and brass knuckles and made a lot of damage on that party.

That’s what confiscation by force fo government is like in principle.

NWO rulers are using Muslims to stop free speech

March 26, 2013

Silent Conquest – The End of Freedom of Expression in the West – YouTube

I know the ending of the story. Daniel 11 says the Antichrist shall “come to his end, and none shall help him”.

So even if these shadowy Jesus-haters rule the world right now, it will not last…


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 91 other followers